Optimal quantization interval design of dynamic quantizers which satisfy the communication rate constraints

This paper proposes the design method of the dynamic quantizer for the networked control systems. It is well known that the dynamic quantizers, which consist of filter and static quantizer, are effective for compressing the data with small quantization error of control. Many methods for designing the dynamic quantizers have been proposed from the perspective of filter design. When it is required to control with network communication, the data size of signal should be minified appropriately by quantizers because of the communication rate constraint. Since the quantization interval (distance between two quantizer outputs) of the quantizer makes an impact on the data rate, determination of quantization interval is important matter in the dynamic quantizers. However, the design method of quantization interval has not been proposed explicitly in the past researches of the dynamic quantizer design. In this paper, we propose the design method of the smaller quantization interval which satisfy the communication rate constraints. The design method is derived as an LMI problem based on the invariant set analysis. By the proposed method, the quantization interval guarantees that the signals are quantized appropriately within the given data size. The effectiveness is illustrated by numerical examples.

[1]  H. Inose,et al.  A Telemetering System by Code Modulation - Δ- ΣModulation , 1962, IRE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry.

[2]  R. Brockett,et al.  Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints. I. State estimation problems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Wing Shing Wong,et al.  Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints. II. Stabilization with limited information feedback , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  장윤희,et al.  Y. , 2003, Industrial and Labor Relations Terms.

[6]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Guest Editorial Special Issue on Networked Control Systems , 2004, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control under communication constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Yoshito Ohta,et al.  Optimal Invariant Sets for Discrete-time Systems: Approximation of Reachable Sets for Bounded Inputs , 2004 .

[9]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS) , 2006 .

[10]  Yuki Minami,et al.  An optimal dynamic quantizer for feedback control with discrete-valued signal constraints , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Shigeyasu Kawaji,et al.  Dynamic Quantizer with Explicit Degree of Freedom for Design , 2008 .

[12]  Shun-ichi Azuma,et al.  Optimal dynamic quantizers for discrete-valued input control , 2008, Autom..

[13]  Carlos Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  Delta modulation for multivariable centralized linear networked controlled systems , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Shun-ichi Azuma,et al.  Synthesis of Optimal Dynamic Quantizers for Discrete-Valued Input Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Yoshito Ohta,et al.  Disturbance Rejection with Information Constraints: Performance Limitations of a Scalar System for Bounded and Gaussian Disturbances , 2009 .

[16]  Nobutomo Matsunaga,et al.  Analysis of dynamic quantizer in 2-DOF Internal Model Control system with dead-time , 2009, 2009 ICCAS-SICE.

[17]  Koji Tsumura,et al.  Tradeoffs between quantization and packet loss in networked control of linear systems , 2009, Autom..

[18]  Y. Ohta,et al.  Disturbance rejection with information constraints: Performance limitations of a scalar system for bounded and Gaussian disturbances , 2012, Autom..