Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis

This article presents a conceptual analysis of collaboration scripts used in face-to-face and computer-mediated collaborative learning. Collaboration scripts are scaffolds that aim to improve collaboration through structuring the interactive processes between two or more learning partners. Collaboration scripts consist of at least five components: (a) learning objectives, (b) type of activities, (c) sequencing, (d) role distribution, and (e) type of representation. These components serve as a basis for comparing prototypical collaboration script approaches for face-to-face vs. computer-mediated learning. As our analysis reveals, collaboration scripts for face-to-face learning often focus on supporting collaborators in engaging in activities that are specifically related to individual knowledge acquisition. Scripts for computer-mediated collaboration are typically concerned with facilitating communicative-coordinative processes that occur among group members. The two lines of research can be consolidated to facilitate the design of collaboration scripts, which both support participation and coordination, as well as induce learning activities closely related to individual knowledge acquisition and metacognition. In addition, research on collaboration scripts needs to consider the learners’ internal collaboration scripts as a further determinant of collaboration behavior. The article closes with the presentation of a conceptual framework on script-based learning that incorporates both external and internal collaboration scripts.

[1]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[2]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[4]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[5]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Verbal Ability and Cooperative Learning: Transfer of Effects , 1984 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[7]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transfer , 1985 .

[8]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. , 1987 .

[9]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[10]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[11]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments , 1989 .

[12]  Velma I. Hythecker,et al.  An Analysis of the Processes Influencing the Structured Dyadic Learning Environment , 1988 .

[13]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[14]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[15]  Richard Reviewer-Granger.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[18]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[19]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Scripted Cooperation and Knowledge Map Supplements , 1992 .

[20]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[21]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[22]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Constructive Conflict in the Schools , 1994 .

[24]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[25]  D. Perkins.  Person plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning , 1994 .

[26]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[27]  E. Cohen,et al.  Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1995 .

[28]  H. Mandl,et al.  Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies , 1996 .

[29]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Video-Mediated Communication , 1997 .

[30]  S. Schwan.  Media Characteristics and Knowledge Acquisition in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[31]  G. Salomon.  Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[32]  Aemilian Hron,et al.  Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen , 1997 .

[33]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Individual and Distributed Cognitions in Interdisciplinary Teamwork: A Developing Case Study and Emerging Theory , 1997 .

[34]  A. King.  ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[35]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  A. King.  Transactive Peer Tutoring: Distributing Cognition and Metacognition , 1998 .

[37]  R. Lebeau,et al.  Cognitive Tools in a Clinical Encounter in Medicine: Supporting Empathy and Expertise in Distributed Systems , 1998 .

[38]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Design Principles for Distributed Knowledge Building Processes , 1998 .

[39]  T. Rocklin,et al.  The Distribution of Distributed Cognition: Multiple Interpretations and Uses , 1998 .

[40]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[41]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[42]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[43]  Mien Segers,et al.  The Effect of Prior Knowledge on Learning in Educational Practice: Studies Using Prior Knowledge State Assessment , 1999 .

[44]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[45]  Michelle D. Young,et al.  Telecommunication in the Classroom: Rhetoric versus Reality , 1999 .

[46]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[47]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[48]  Detlev Leutner.  Double-fading support - a training approach to complex software systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[49]  G. Nuthall,et al.  The Role of Memory in the Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge in Science and Social Studies Units , 2000 .

[50]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[51]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[52]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[53]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Commentary: Towards an Integrated View of Learning from Text and Visual Displays , 2002 .

[54]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[55]  Ioanna Vekiri.  What Is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning? , 2002 .

[56]  Martin Mühlpfordt,et al.  Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: the learning protocol approach , 2002, CSCL.

[57]  A. King.  Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing , 2002 .

[58]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[59]  Hee-Sun Lee.  Scaffolding elementary students' authentic inquiry through a written science curriculum. , 2003 .

[60]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Internet Environments for Science Education , 2004 .

[61]  R. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[62]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[63]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2004 .

[64]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations Using Scaffolded Curriculum Materials and Assessments , 2004 .

[65]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[66]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[67]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[68]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  The impact of role assignment as scripting tool on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups , 2005, CSCL.

[69]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[70]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[71]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing , 2005, CSCL.

[72]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools , 2005, CSCL.

[73]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology , 2005, CSCL.

[74]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  CSCL scripts: modelling features and potential use , 2005, CSCL.

[75]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[76]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning : cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives , 2007 .

[77]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Designing Integrative Scripts , 2007 .

[78]  F. Fischer,et al.  The Interplay of Internal and External Scripts , 2007 .

[79]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .