Biosensor Approach to Psychopathology Classification

We used a multi-round, two-party exchange game in which a healthy subject played a subject diagnosed with a DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual-IV) disorder, and applied a Bayesian clustering approach to the behavior exhibited by the healthy subject. The goal was to characterize quantitatively the style of play elicited in the healthy subject (the proposer) by their DSM-diagnosed partner (the responder). The approach exploits the dynamics of the behavior elicited in the healthy proposer as a biosensor for cognitive features that characterize the psychopathology group at the other side of the interaction. Using a large cohort of subjects (n = 574), we found statistically significant clustering of proposers' behavior overlapping with a range of DSM-IV disorders including autism spectrum disorder, borderline personality disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and major depressive disorder. To further validate these results, we developed a computer agent to replace the human subject in the proposer role (the biosensor) and show that it can also detect these same four DSM-defined disorders. These results suggest that the highly developed social sensitivities that humans bring to a two-party social exchange can be exploited and automated to detect important psychopathologies, using an interpersonal behavioral probe not directly related to the defining diagnostic criteria.

[1]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[2]  P. Buckley,et al.  The Rupture and Repair of Cooperation in Borderline Personality Disorder , 2009 .

[3]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[4]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[6]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  Identifying individual differences: An algorithm with application to Phineas Gage , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[7]  Pearl H. Chiu,et al.  Self Responses along Cingulate Cortex Reveal Quantitative Neural Phenotype for High-Functioning Autism , 2008, Neuron.

[8]  Colin F Camerer,et al.  Agent-Specific Responses in the Cingulate Cortex During Economic Exchanges , 2006, Science.

[9]  Colin Camerer,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF A SEQUENTIAL EQUILIBRIUM REPUTATION MODEL , 1988 .

[10]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  A. Raftery,et al.  Estimating Bayes Factors via Posterior Simulation with the Laplace—Metropolis Estimator , 1997 .

[12]  L. Hubert,et al.  Comparing partitions , 1985 .

[13]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[14]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[15]  J. Q. Smith,et al.  1. Bayesian Statistics 4 , 1993 .

[16]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[17]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications , 1988 .

[18]  Colin Camerer,et al.  When Does "Economic Man" Dominate Social Behavior? , 2006, Science.

[19]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[20]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[21]  M. Keane,et al.  Behavior in a dynamic decision problem: An analysis of experimental evidence using a bayesian type classification algorithm , 2004 .

[22]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  MCLUST Version 3: An R Package for Normal Mixture Modeling and Model-Based Clustering , 2006 .

[23]  A. Couteur,et al.  Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders , 1994, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[24]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[26]  M. Delgado,et al.  Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[28]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[29]  A. Raftery,et al.  How Many Iterations in the Gibbs Sampler , 1991 .

[30]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Game Theory of Mind , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[33]  Timothy J Trull,et al.  Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[34]  C. Robert,et al.  Estimation of Finite Mixture Distributions Through Bayesian Sampling , 1994 .

[35]  Terry Lohrenz,et al.  To Detect and Correct: Norm Violations and Their Enforcement , 2007, Neuron.

[36]  Peter Bossaerts,et al.  Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.