Free energy calculations of the interactions of c-Jun-based synthetic peptides with the c-Fos protein.

The c-Fos-c-Jun complex forms the activator protein 1 transcription factor, a therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer. Various synthetic peptides have been designed to try to selectively disrupt the interaction between c-Fos and c-Jun at its leucine zipper domain. To evaluate the binding affinity between these synthetic peptides and c-Fos, polarizable and nonpolarizable molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted, and the resulting conformations were analyzed using the molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) method to compute free energies of binding. In contrast to empirical and semiempirical approaches, the estimation of free energies of binding using a combination of MD simulations and the MM/GBSA approach takes into account dynamical properties such as conformational changes, as well as solvation effects and hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions. The predicted binding affinities of the series of c-Jun-based peptides targeting the c-Fos peptide show good correlation with experimental melting temperatures. This provides the basis for the rational design of peptides based on internal, van der Waals, and electrostatic interactions.

[1]  J. Worrall,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of Jun–Fos coiled coil peptide antagonists , 2011, The FEBS journal.

[2]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  Zhili Zuo,et al.  Calculations of the Free Energy of Interaction of the c-Fos-c-Jun Coiled Coil: Effects of the Solvation Model and the Inclusion of Polarization Effects , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  Huanxiang Liu,et al.  Molecular basis of the interaction for an essential subunit PA-PB1 in influenza virus RNA polymerase: insights from molecular dynamics simulation and free energy calculation. , 2010, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[6]  Emanuel Fleige,et al.  Position-dependent effects of fluorinated amino acids on the hydrophobic core formation of a heterodimeric coiled coil. , 2009, Chemistry.

[7]  G. Hummer,et al.  Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.

[9]  T. Cheatham,et al.  Molecular dynamics guided study of salt bridge length dependence in both fluorinated and non‐fluorinated parallel dimeric coiled‐coils , 2009, Proteins.

[10]  T. Exner,et al.  Improving the interaction of Myc‐interfering peptides with Myc using molecular dynamics simulations , 2009, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[11]  K. Müller,et al.  Targeting the c‐Myc coiled coil with interfering peptides , 2008, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[12]  Ricardo L. Mancera,et al.  Computational Methods for the Prediction of the Structure and Interactions of Coiled-Coil Peptides , 2008 .

[13]  K. Müller,et al.  Selectional and mutational scope of peptides sequestering the Jun-Fos coiled-coil domain. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Marwen Naïm,et al.  Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Jiunn R Chen,et al.  PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome , 2007, Science.

[17]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  The performance of non-polarizable and polarizable force-field parameter sets for ethylene glycol in molecular dynamics simulations of the pure liquid and its aqueous mixtures , 2007 .

[18]  R. Larson,et al.  Prediction of the stability of coiled coils using molecular dynamics simulations , 2007 .

[19]  Rajendra K. Sharma,et al.  Role of calpain and caspase system in the regulation of N-myristoyltransferase in human colon cancer (Review). , 2007, International journal of molecular medicine.

[20]  Gregory A Caputo,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Computational Design of Peptides That Target Transmembrane Helices , 2007 .

[21]  J. Gerrard,et al.  Inhibiting protein-protein interactions as an emerging paradigm for drug discovery. , 2007, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Mark A. Schmitz,et al.  Semirational design of Jun-Fos coiled coils with increased affinity: Universal implications for leucine zipper prediction and design. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Strike a balance: Optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  Qiang Shen,et al.  cFos is critical for MCF-7 breast cancer cell growth , 2005, Oncogene.

[28]  T. Baker,et al.  Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Min Lu,et al.  Expression of estrogen receptor α, retinoic acid receptor α and cellular retinoic acid binding protein II genes is coordinately regulated in human breast cancer cells , 2005, Oncogene.

[30]  Raj Kumar,et al.  Gene regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor: Structure:function relationship , 2005, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[31]  V. Bohr,et al.  Pathways and functions of the Werner syndrome protein , 2005, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[32]  M. Bjurlin,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in vasopressin signal transduction: new evidence for cytoskeletal dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[33]  Ricardo L Mancera,et al.  Comparative estimation of vibrational entropy changes in proteins through normal modes analysis. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[34]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[35]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computational design of protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[36]  L. Castagnoli,et al.  Protein Interaction Networks by Proteome Peptide Scanning , 2004, PLoS biology.

[37]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[39]  Irwin D Kuntz,et al.  Free energy calculations for theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer: Comparison of MM-PBSA and thermodynamic integration methods. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[40]  Ray Luo,et al.  Accelerated Poisson–Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[41]  M. Karin,et al.  AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[42]  Junmei Wang,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[43]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[44]  B. Berger,et al.  MultiCoil: A program for predicting two‐and three‐stranded coiled coils , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[45]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[46]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules , 1995 .

[47]  P. Kollman,et al.  Structure and Properties of Neat Liquids Using Nonadditive Molecular Dynamics: Water, Methanol, and N-Methylacetamide , 1995 .

[48]  K. Sharp,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models , 1994 .

[49]  I. Chaiken,et al.  Controlled formation of model homo- and heterodimer coiled coil polypeptides. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[50]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Peptide ‘Velcro’: Design of a heterodimeric coiled coil , 1993, Current Biology.

[51]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[52]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[53]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[54]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .