The Bone Dysplasia Ontology: integrating genotype and phenotype information in the skeletal dysplasia domain

BackgroundSkeletal dysplasias are a rare and heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting skeletal development. Patients with skeletal dysplasias suffer from many complex medical issues including degenerative joint disease and neurological complications. Because the data and expertise associated with this field is both sparse and disparate, significant benefits will potentially accrue from the availability of an ontology that provides a shared conceptualisation of the domain knowledge and enables data integration, cross-referencing and advanced reasoning across the relevant but distributed data sources.ResultsWe introduce the design considerations and implementation details of the Bone Dysplasia Ontology. We also describe the different components of the ontology, including a comprehensive and formal representation of the skeletal dysplasia domain as well as the related genotypes and phenotypes. We then briefly describe SKELETOME, a community-driven knowledge curation platform that is underpinned by the Bone Dysplasia Ontology. SKELETOME enables domain experts to use, refine and extend and apply the ontology without any prior ontology engineering experience--to advance the body of knowledge in the skeletal dysplasia field.ConclusionsThe Bone Dysplasia Ontology represents the most comprehensive structured knowledge source for the skeletal dysplasias domain. It provides the means for integrating and annotating clinical and research data, not only at the generic domain knowledge level, but also at the level of individual patient case studies. It enables links between individual cases and publicly available genotype and phenotype resources based on a community-driven curation process that ensures a shared conceptualisation of the domain knowledge and its continuous incremental evolution.

[1]  Sheila Unger,et al.  Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders: 2010 Revision , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[2]  Angus Roberts,et al.  Building a semantically annotated corpus of clinical texts , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Modeling a description logic vocabulary for cancer research , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Barry Smith,et al.  Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  Alan Ruttenberg,et al.  Life sciences on the Semantic Web: the Neurocommons and beyond , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[7]  Alan Ruttenberg,et al.  MIREOT: The minimum information to reference an external ontology term , 2009, Appl. Ontology.

[8]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[9]  Boris Motik,et al.  Optimized Reasoning in Description Logics Using Hypertableaux , 2007, CADE.

[10]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Udo Hahn,et al.  High-performance gene name normalization with GENO , 2009, Bioinform..

[12]  K. Spackman SNOMED RT and SNOMEDCT. Promise of an international clinical terminology. , 2000, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[13]  S. Robertson,et al.  Serpentine fibula polycystic kidney syndrome is part of the phenotypic spectrum of Hajdu–Cheney syndrome , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[14]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[15]  S. Antonarakis,et al.  Corrigendum: Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: A discussion , 2002, Human mutation.

[16]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Yukiko Matsuoka,et al.  PathText: a text mining integrator for biological pathway visualizations , 2010, Bioinform..

[18]  P. Robinson,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Chris Mungall,et al.  Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Hong Cui,et al.  Semantic annotation of morphological descriptions: an overall strategy , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Entity/quality-based logical definitions for the human skeletal phenome using PATO , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[24]  Hans-Michael Müller,et al.  Textpresso: An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval and Extraction System for Biological Literature , 2004, PLoS biology.

[25]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis , 2009, Summit on translational bioinformatics.