A Novel Skin-Stretch Haptic Device for Intuitive Control of Robotic Prostheses and Avatars

Without proprioception, i.e., the intrinsic capability of a body to perceive its own limb position, completing daily life activities would require constant visual attention and it would be challenging or even impossible. This situation is similar to the one experienced after limb amputation and in robotic tele-operation, where the natural sensory-motor loop is broken. While some promising solutions based on skin stretch sensory substitution have been proposed to restore tactile properties in these conditions, there is still room for enhancing the intuitiveness of stimulus delivery and integration of haptic feedback devices within user's body. To contribute to this goal, here, we propose a wearable device based on skin stretch stimulation, the Stretch-Pro, which can provide proprioceptive information on artificial hand aperture. This system can be suitably integrated in a prosthetic socket or can be easily worn by a user controlling remote robots. The system can imitate the stretching of the skin that would naturally occur on the intact limb, when it is used to accomplish motor tasks. Two versions of the system are presented, with one and two actuators, respectively, which deliver the stretch stimulus in different ways. Experiments with able-bodied participants and a preliminary test with one prosthesis user are reported. Results suggest that Stretch-Pro could be a viable solution to convey proprioceptive cues to upper limb prosthesis users, opening promising perspectives for tele-robotics applications.

[1]  D. McCloskey Kinesthetic sensibility. , 1978, Physiological reviews.

[2]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  B. Edin,et al.  Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[5]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Gabriel Robles-De-La-Torre,et al.  The importance of the sense of touch in virtual and real environments , 2006, IEEE MultiMedia.

[7]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  C. Pylatiuk,et al.  Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: Studies on targeted motion , 2010, TAP.

[10]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Rotational Skin Stretch Feedback: A Wearable Haptic Display for Motion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[11]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Tool Contact Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[12]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibro- and Electrotactile User Feedback on Hand Opening for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Hans Dietl,et al.  User demands for sensory feedback in upper extremity prostheses , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[14]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Grip Force Control of sEMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hands in Targeted Reinnervation Amputees , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Jonathan Tong,et al.  Two-Point Orientation Discrimination Versus the Traditional Two-Point Test for Tactile Spatial Acuity Assessment , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[17]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Teleimpedance control of a synergy-driven anthropomorphic hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Grasping With a Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis: Which Are the Relevant Feedback Variables for Force Control? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Christopher J Hasson,et al.  Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  F. Nuttall,et al.  Body Mass Index , 2020, Definitions.

[21]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Wearable Haptic Systems for the Fingertip and the Hand: Taxonomy, Review, and Perspectives , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[22]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[23]  A. Bicchi,et al.  WALK-MAN Humanoid Robot : Field Experiments in a Post-earthquake Scenario , 2017 .

[24]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  On the Role of Affective Properties in Hedonic and Discriminant Haptic Systems , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  Edoardo Battaglia,et al.  The Rice Haptic Rocker: Skin stretch haptic feedback with the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2017, 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[26]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Simplifying Telerobotics: Wearability and Teleimpedance Improves Human-Robot Interactions in Teleoperation , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[27]  Ali Israr,et al.  Improving Perception Accuracy with Multi-sensory Haptic Cue Delivery , 2018, EuroHaptics.

[28]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Haptics: The Present and Future of Artificial Touch Sensation , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control. Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis , 2018, PloS one.

[30]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  HapPro: A Wearable Haptic Device for Proprioceptive Feedback , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.