Student Choice, Instructor Flexibility: Moving Beyond the Blended Instructional Model

Due to the rapid increase in online course enrollments, online and blended education receives much research attention. However, a paucity of research exists for the Hybrid-Flexible (HyFlex) instructional model. This model allows students flexibility about how to participate in lecture and is geared toward providing students with educational choices and incorporating instructional technologies that mirror the personal technologies students use every day. This article outlines the development and testing of a modified HyFlex instructional model specifically designed for large, on-campus courses where students had three attendance mode choices (live online, face-to-face, or view a recorded session). To support curricular goals, the instructor implemented technology affording live lecture streaming, polling, and backchannel communication with negligible cost to students and little cost to the department. Highlighted results indicate the modified HyFlex instructional model had no negative impact on student performance in the class, both in overall learning and on individual grades. Furthermore, students greatly enjoyed the educational choices and overwhelmingly reported the incorporation of technology increased their participation in class and comprehension of course content. The authors discuss the findings, address study limitations, and offer suggestions for future HyFlex research. DOI:  10.2458/azu_itet_v1i1_miller

[1]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[2]  Scott A. Ginder,et al.  Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2006; Graduation Rates, 2000 & 2003 Cohorts; and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2006. First Look. NCES 2008-173. , 2008 .

[3]  Beth Chance,et al.  ASSESSING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AFTER A FIRST COURSE IN STATISTICS , 2007 .

[4]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[5]  Derek O. Bruff,et al.  Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments , 2009 .

[6]  Robert Potter,et al.  To Stream or Not to Stream in a Quantitative Business Course. , 2010 .

[7]  Eden Dahlstrom,et al.  ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2014. , 2014 .

[8]  M'hammed Abdous,et al.  Learner outcomes and satisfaction: A comparison of live video-streamed instruction, satellite broadcast instruction, and face-to-face instruction , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Janet Cole,et al.  Live lecture streaming for distributed learning , 2011 .

[10]  Laura G. Knapp,et al.  Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2010; Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2010; and Graduation Rates, Selected Cohorts, 2002-07. First Look. NCES 2012-280. , 2012 .

[11]  M. Freeman,et al.  Talk through the Hand: Using Audience Response Keypads to Augment the Facilitation of Small Group Dialogue , 2009 .

[12]  Debra Filer,et al.  Everyone's Answering: Using Technology to Increase Classroom Participation , 2010, Nursing education perspectives.

[13]  Larisa Olesova,et al.  Hotseat: Opening the Backchannel in Large Lectures , 2010 .

[14]  Cliff Atkinson The Backchannel: How Audiences are Using Twitter and Social Media and Changing Presentations Forever , 2009 .