Saturation Editing of Genomic Regions by Multiplex Homology-Directed Repair

Saturation mutagenesis—coupled to an appropriate biological assay—represents a fundamental means of achieving a high-resolution understanding of regulatory and protein-coding nucleic acid sequences of interest. However, mutagenized sequences introduced in trans on episomes or via random or “safe-harbour” integration fail to capture the native context of the endogenous chromosomal locus. This shortcoming markedly limits the interpretability of the resulting measurements of mutational impact. Here, we couple CRISPR/Cas9 RNA-guided cleavage with multiplex homology-directed repair using a complex library of donor templates to demonstrate saturation editing of genomic regions. In exon 18 of BRCA1, we replace a six-base-pair (bp) genomic region with all possible hexamers, or the full exon with all possible single nucleotide variants (SNVs), and measure strong effects on transcript abundance attributable to nonsense-mediated decay and exonic splicing elements. We similarly perform saturation genome editing of a well-conserved coding region of an essential gene, DBR1, and measure relative effects on growth that correlate with functional impact. Measurement of the functional consequences of large numbers of mutations with saturation genome editing will potentially facilitate high-resolution functional dissection of both cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors, as well as the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance observed in clinical sequencing.

[1]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[2]  Jac A. Nickoloff,et al.  Gene Conversion Tracts from Double-Strand Break Repair in Mammalian Cells , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  C. Barbas,et al.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[4]  P. Radivojac,et al.  MutPred Splice: machine learning-based prediction of exonic variants that disrupt splicing , 2014, Genome Biology.

[5]  S. Shuman,et al.  Structure–function analysis of yeast RNA debranching enzyme (Dbr1), a manganese-dependent phosphodiesterase , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  J. Wells,et al.  High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. , 1989, Science.

[7]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[8]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Jay Shendure,et al.  High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  J. Kinney,et al.  Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jeffry D Sander,et al.  FLAsH assembly of TALeNs for high-throughput genome editing , 2022 .

[14]  Jingyue Ju,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements. , 2011, Genome research.

[15]  R. Myers,et al.  Fine structure genetic analysis of a beta-globin promoter. , 1986, Science.

[16]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. , 2014, Annual review of biochemistry.

[17]  E. Mcwhinnie,et al.  DNA sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for target validation in mammalian cells. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[18]  P. Bork,et al.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations , 2010, Nature Methods.

[19]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[20]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[21]  J. Shendure,et al.  A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  High Resolution Mapping of Protein Sequence–Function Relationships , 2010, Nature Methods.

[23]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  GC content around splice sites affects splicing through pre-mRNA secondary structures , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[24]  Markus Seiler,et al.  The transience of transient overexpression , 2013, Nature Methods.

[25]  Thuy D. Vo,et al.  Transient cold shock enhances zinc-finger nuclease–mediated gene disruption , 2010, Nature Methods.

[26]  Shondra M Pruett-Miller,et al.  High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases , 2011, Nature Methods.

[27]  G M Lenoir,et al.  A BRCA1 nonsense mutation causes exon skipping. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR , 2013, Bioinform..

[30]  Elisa Goina,et al.  Binding of DAZAP1 and hnRNPA1/A2 to an Exonic Splicing Silencer in a Natural BRCA1 Exon 18 Mutant , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[31]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[32]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[33]  D Botstein,et al.  Strategies and applications of in vitro mutagenesis. , 1985, Science.

[34]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 system. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[35]  Carla P. Guimarães,et al.  Haploid Genetic Screens in Human Cells Identify Host Factors Used by Pathogens , 2009, Science.