End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: Physicians' and nurses' experiences

BACKGROUND End-user participation is essential to the development of health information systems (HIS) that are useful for clinicians and support their routine work. However, few studies have investigated end users' experiences with HIS development and their preferred ways of participation in it. OBJECTIVES This study examined the participation experiences of physicians and nurses with HIS development. METHODS National cross-sectional surveys on end users' experiences with HIS development were conducted in Finland among physicians in 2010, 2014, and 2017 and nurses in 2017. For the purposes of this study, we selected and analyzed the statements concerning participation and end users' experiences on HIS development and their preferred ways of participation in it. RESULTS A total of 3013 physicians and 2685 nurses working in public hospitals and health centers were included in this study. In total, 48.4 % of physicians and 45.4 % of nurses reported that they had participated in HIS development; however, 85.1 % of respondents regarded that software vendors are not interested in end users' viewpoints and development ideas. Most respondents (53.4 %) preferred to participate by communicating with a person responsible for HIS development within the organization. Few participants reported that the proposed improvements took place in the desired manner (10.0 %) or quickly enough (6.9 %). Younger clinicians were more willing to participate in HIS development than older clinicians. During the follow-up period (2010, 2014, 2017), the physicians' experiences did not improve. CONCLUSIONS While physicians and nurses are willing to participate in HIS development, suitable methods to effectively include them and their feedback seem to be lacking or underutilized. Crucially, physicians and nurses, who make up the largest groups of end users, are not able to influence HIS development in their preferred ways. Healthcare organizations must recognize the importance of clinician participation; these clinicians should have the opportunity to continue clinical work.

[1]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[2]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[3]  Kevin M. Baldwin,et al.  The UCLA Health Resident Informaticist Program – A Novel Clinical Informatics Training Program , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Examining barriers to healthcare providers' adoption of a hospital-wide electronic patient journey board , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Suvi Vainiomäki,et al.  Potilastietojärjestelmät lääkärin työvälineenä 2014: käyttäjäkokemuksissa ei merkittäviä muutoksia , 2014 .

[7]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  Participatory Design, User Involvement and Health IT Evaluation. , 2016, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  Suvi Vainiomäki,et al.  Lääkärien arviot potilastietojärjestelmistä ovat parantuneet hieman , 2018 .

[11]  Adi V. Gundlapalli,et al.  Five Years of Clinical Informatics Board Certification for Physicians in the United States of America , 2018, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[12]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[13]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Rapid Contextual Design: A How-To Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design , 2004, UBIQ.

[14]  Tinja Lääveri,et al.  National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: Physicians suffer from poor usability , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  H. Hyppönen,et al.  Factors Related to Health Informatics Competencies for Nurses-Results of a National Electronic Health Record Survey. , 2019, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[16]  V. Jormanainen.  Large-scale implementation and adoption of the Finnish national Kanta services in 2010–2017: a prospective, longitudinal, indicator-based study , 2018, Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare.

[17]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Customer Feedback and Data Collection Techniques in Software R&D: A Literature Review , 2015, ICSOB.

[18]  Naveed Saleem,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Contingency Approach to User Participation in Information Systems Development , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Tinja Lääveri,et al.  Physicians' experiences of participation in healthcare IT development in Finland: Willing but not able , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  Susanna Martikainen,et al.  Where does the interaction break down? The stakeholder map of health IT systems development and use in Finland , 2015 .

[21]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Configuring information systems and work practices for each other: What competences are needed locally? , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Jarmo Reponen,et al.  E-health and e-welfare of Finland - Check point 2015 , 2015 .

[23]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  B. Rahimi,et al.  Development of Hospital Information Systems: User Participation and Factors Affecting It , 2014, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[25]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  A Decade of Health Information Technology Usability Challenges and the Path Forward , 2019, JAMA.

[26]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[27]  Susanna Martikainen,et al.  User participation in healthcare IT development: A developers' viewpoint in Finland , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  R. Epstein,et al.  The Anesthesiologist-Informatician: A Survey of Physicians Board-Certified in Both Anesthesiology and Clinical Informatics , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[29]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Review of health information technology usability study methodologies , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Sylvia Pelayo,et al.  From users involvement to users' needs understanding: A case study , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[31]  K. Rask,et al.  Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences With the Implementation of a Medication Administration System , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[32]  Sari Kujala,et al.  user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs , 2016 .

[33]  David Benyon,et al.  Adaptive systems: A solution to usability problems , 1993, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[34]  Elizabeth M. Borycki,et al.  Physician satisfaction with a critical care clinical information system using a multimethod evaluation of usability , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[35]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Involving users in the wild - Participatory product development in and with online communities , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Ulla-Mari Kinnunen,et al.  Kyvykkäille käyttäjille fiksut järjestelmät? : Sairaanhoitajien arviot potilastietojärjestelmistä 2017 , 2018 .

[37]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[38]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[39]  Chen-Tan Lin,et al.  Optimization Sprints: Improving Clinician Satisfaction and Teamwork by Rapidly Reducing Electronic Health Record Burden , 2019, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[40]  Tinja Lääveri,et al.  Better Usability and Technical Stability Could Lead to Better Work-Related Well-Being among Physicians , 2017, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[41]  Ramanath Subramanyam,et al.  User participation in software development projects , 2010, CACM.

[42]  H. Hyppönen,et al.  Lääkärien arviot potilastietojärjestelmistä kriittisiä , 2010 .

[43]  Elizabeth M. Borycki,et al.  Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[44]  Lisiane Pruinelli,et al.  Nurse Informaticians Report Low Satisfaction and Multi-level Concerns with Electronic Health Records: Results from an International Survey , 2016, AMIA.

[45]  Janita F. J. Vos,et al.  Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[46]  Ian Robinson,et al.  User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. , 2006, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[47]  Johanna Kaipio,et al.  Developing the National Usability-Focused Health Information System Scale for Physicians: Validation Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[48]  Christoph U. Lehmann,et al.  Nursing Informatics Certification Worldwide: History, Pathway, Roles, and Motivation , 2016, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[49]  Mark Huang.  IT Is From Mars and Physicians From Venus: Bridging the Gap , 2017, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.