Facts-Well-Put

In this paper we elucidate a particular type of instrument. Striking-phenomenon instruments assume their striking profile against the shifting backdrop of theoretical uncertainties. While technologically stable, the phenomena produced by these instruments are linguistically fuzzy, subject to a variety of conceptual representations. But in virtue of their technological stability alone, they can provide a foundation for further technological as well as conceptual development. Sometimes, as in the case of the pulse glass, the phenomenon is taken to confirm conflicting theoretical views; sometimes, as in the case of the Lichtenberg-figures, it holds out the false promise of crucial theoretical importance; sometimes, as in the case of the airpump in the 18th century, it emphatically short-circuits theory and human ingenuity, giving a voice to nature herself; and sometimes, finally, as in the case of the quincunx, the phenomenon stands in for theoretical accounts. We propose and develop the salient features of these instruments demonstrating their importance to our understanding of science.

[1]  P. Guttorp,et al.  The Taming of Chance. , 1992 .

[2]  R. Kapp British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1950, Nature.

[3]  K. Pearson,et al.  The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton , 1931, Nature.

[4]  S. Stigler,et al.  The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 by Stephen M. Stigler (review) , 1986, Technology and Culture.

[5]  I. Bernard Cohen,et al.  Benjamin Franklin's Experiments: A New Edition of Franklin's Experiments and Observations on Electricity , 1942 .

[6]  The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life, Gerd Gigerenzer. Cambridge University Press, New York. ISBN: 0-521-33115-3. $NA , 1990 .

[7]  C. Hartshorne,et al.  Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce , 1935, Nature.

[8]  Peter Achinstein,et al.  Observation, experiment, and hypothesis in modern physical science , 1986 .

[9]  James Bryant Conant,et al.  Robert Boyle's experiments in pneumatics , 1967 .

[10]  B. Latour The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosophy , 1991 .

[11]  J. Priestley Lectures on History, and General Policy: To Which Is Prefixed, an Essay on a Course of Liberal Education for Civil and Active Life , 2007 .

[12]  Typical Laws of Heredity , 1877, Nature.

[13]  B. Bowers,et al.  Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: a Study of Early Modern Physics , 1980 .

[14]  Samuel Devons,et al.  Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries : a study of early Modern physics , 1980 .

[15]  O. Lidwell Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society , 1961, Nature.

[16]  D. Baird Five Theses on Instrumental Realism , 1988, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[17]  Davis Baird Instruments on the Cusp of Science and Technology : The Indicator Diagram , 1989 .

[18]  Thomas Faust,et al.  Scientific Instruments, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron1 , 1990, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[19]  Samuel Eliot Morison,et al.  The papers of Benjamin Franklin , 1960 .

[20]  William Hyde Wollaston On a Method of Freezing at a Distance. [Abstract] , 1800 .

[21]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[22]  E. Darwin The botanic garden , 1978 .

[23]  M. Heidegger The question concerning technology , 2024, East Asian Journal of Philosophy.

[24]  I. Hacking,et al.  How Experiments End , 1989 .