Primary auditory neurons in crickets: Physiology and central projections

Summary1.The tibial tympanal organs ofGryllus campestris L. andGryllus bimaculatus DeGeer were stimulated with sound signals simulating the natural calling song, produced by sinusoidal amplitude envelope, using carrier frequencies (CF) in the range of 2–20 kHz at various intensities.2.Glass microelectrodes (filled with 3 M potassium acetate, or with 1 M cobalt nitrate for marking the fibers) were used to record extracellularly or quasi intracellularly the spike activity of single sensory fibers in the leg nerve (Fig. 1) responding to acoustic stimuli and to stain their central projections within the prothoracic ganglion (Figs. 6–9).3.The temporal pattern of the sound stimulus —syllable and verse structure — is reflected in the discharge pattern of the fibers studied (Figs. 1, 6, 7).4.Five types of fibers tuned to specific CFs were found (Fig. 2). These had peak sensitivities (a) at 4–5 kHz (CF of the species calling song), (b) at both 4–5 and 10–12 kHz, (c) below 2 kHZ, (d) at 12 kHz, and (e) at 17 kHz (CF of the species courtship song).5.The tuning is also evident in the responsiveness (spikes/syllable) to stimuli of different frequencies at suprathreshold intensities (Fig. 3).6.In the range of their best frequencies (BF) the fibers tuned to 4–5 and to 10–12 kHz are similar in intensity characteristics and in relationship of latencies to sound intensity, with a linear relationship between responsiveness and latency (Fig. 4). Within a single calling-song verse, the spike response decreases, and the latency increases, from the first to the fourth syllable (Fig. 5). Even at the highest intensities the discharge rate nerver exceeds 350 Hz.7.The central arborization and projection areas of all the marked fibers are restricted to the ipsilateral half of the prothoracic ganglion. Assuming that fibers marked include those recorded physiologically, it appears that those tuned to 4–5 kHz terminate exclusively in the “crescent-shaped” neuropile, localized and termed the “auditory neuropile” (Figs. 6, 7). Fibers with a peak sensitivity below 2 kHz differ distinctly from the 4–5 kHz group in that they have additional arborizations outside the auditory neuropile (Fig. 8). As yet no unequivocal data are available regarding the spatial arrangement of the fibers with two sensitivity peaks (both 4–5 and 10–12 kHz) and those tuned to 12 kHz or 17 kHz (Fig. 9).

[1]  J. Rheinlaender Transmission of acoustic information at three neuronal levels in the auditory system ofDecticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera) , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  Harald Nocke,et al.  Physiological aspects of sound communication in crickets (Gryllus campestris L.) , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  Frequency Discrimination in the Locust Ear by means of Four Groups of Receptor Cells , 1968, Nature.

[4]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Brain projections and information processing of biologically significant sounds by two large ventral-cord neurons ofGryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  H. Rehbein Auditory neurons in the ventral cord of the locust: Morphological and functional properties , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  Auditory sensitivity of the crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[7]  Responses of central auditory neurons of female crickets (Gryllus campestris L.) to the calling song of the male , 1972, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[8]  Eckehard Eibl Morphology of the sense organs in the proximal parts of the tibiae ofGryllus campestrisL. andGryllus bimaculatus deGeer (Insecta, Ensifera) , 1978, Zoomorphologie.

[9]  K. Kalmring,et al.  The physiological characteristics of the primary sensory neurons of the complex tibial organ ofDecticus verrucivorus L. (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidae) , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  K. G. Hill Carrier frequency as a factor in phonotactic behaviour of female crickets (Teleogryllus commodus) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  M. Zaretsky,et al.  Carrier frequency-sensitive primary auditory neurons in crickets and their anatomical projection to the central nervous system , 1978 .

[12]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Structure and function of acoustic neurons in the thoracic ventral nerve cord ofLocusta migratoria (Acrididae) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  M. Dambach Der Vibrationssinn der Grillen , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  E. Ball,et al.  Structure and development of the auditory system in the prothoracic leg of the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (walker) , 1974, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[15]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Biophysics of the ensiferan ear , 1978, Journal of Comparative Physiology.

[16]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Auditory interneurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, gryllus bimaculatus deGeer , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  Ann Fielden Transmission Through the Last Abdominal Ganglion of the Dragonfly Nymph, Anax Imperator , 1960 .

[18]  Franz Huber,et al.  Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneurons (Gryllus campestris L.,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer) , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[19]  J. S. Altman,et al.  A silver intensification method for cobalt-filled neurones in wholemount preparations , 1977, Brain Research.

[20]  Karin Michel Das tympanalorgan von Gryllus bimaculatus Degeer (saltatoria, gryllidae) , 1974, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.

[21]  Central projections of tibial sensory fibers within the three thoracic ganglia of crickets (Gryllus campestris L.,Gvyllus bimaculatus DeGeer) , 1979, Zoomorphologie.

[22]  Sensitivity to frequency and direction of sound in the auditory system of crickets (Gryllidae) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  R. Hoy,et al.  Auditory interneurons in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: Physiological and anatomical properties , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  F. Huber,et al.  Central projections of fibers in the auditory and tensor nerves of cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Biophysics of the ensiferan ear , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  Watt W. Webb,et al.  Physical basis for auditory frequency analysis in field crickets (Gryllidae) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  Analysis of the cricket auditory system by acoustic stimulation using a closed sound field , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Neuroethology of Acoustic Communication , 1978 .

[29]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Acoustic Behaviour and Auditory System in Insects , 1974 .

[30]  F. Huber,et al.  Perception of substrate-vibration in crickets , 1974 .

[31]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Auditory interneurones in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.