Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes

The current study examined the processes involved in the preparation of sequencing and timing initiation for multi-component responses. In two experiments, participants performed a reaction time (RT) task involving a three key-press sequence with either a simple (isochronous) or complex (non-isochronous) timing structure. Conditions involved a precue that provided information about all features of the movement (simple RT), no features of the movement (choice RT), sequencing only, or timing structure only. When sequencing was precued, RT decreased significantly as compared to choice RT, indicative of advance preparation of sequencing. When timing was precued, RT decreased significantly compared to choice RT when the timing structure was simple, suggesting that some aspect of timing preparation can occur prior to the go stimulus. However, even when the timing structure was known in advance, RT was still affected by timing complexity, confirming that some aspect of timing preparation cannot occur until after the onset of the stimulus and thus occurs during the RT interval. To explain these findings, we propose a two-component model of preparation for the timing initiation structure in which timing selection occurs in advance but timing implementation must occur following the go signal. These results support and extend previous findings regarding the independence of the processes associated with response sequencing and timing initiation.

[1]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Independent planning of timing and sequencing for complex movements. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Stuart T. Klapp,et al.  Comments on the Classic Henry and Rogers (1960) Paper on Its 50th Anniversary , 2010 .

[3]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[4]  I. Jentzsch,et al.  Are temporal response features prepared in fixed order? Inferences from movement-related potentials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Richard J Jagacinski,et al.  Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  W. Meck,et al.  Neuropsychological mechanisms of interval timing behavior. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[7]  David L Wright,et al.  Long-Term Motor Programming Improvements Occur Via Concatenation of Movement Sequences During Random But Not During Blocked Practice , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  E. R. Grossman Entropy and choice time: The effect of frequency unbalance on choice-response , 1953 .

[9]  J. A. Leonard,et al.  Advance Information in Sensori-Motor Skills , 1953 .

[10]  C. Shea,et al.  Planning and Executing Simple Movements: Contributions of Relative-Time and Overall-Duration Specification , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  C. Shea,et al.  Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  R. Church,et al.  Simultaneous temporal processing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Changes in the Incidental Context Impacts Search but not Loading of the Motor Buffer , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  A. Haith,et al.  Independence of Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  A two-stage model of concurrent interval timing in monkeys. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  David Goodman,et al.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. , 1980 .

[18]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Reaction Time Analysis of Two Types of Motor Preparation for Speech Articulation: Action as a Sequence of Chunks , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  David L Wright,et al.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[21]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. , 1995 .

[22]  R. Cunnington,et al.  Motor timing and the preparation for sequential actions , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Motor timing and motor sequencing contribute differently to the preparation for voluntary movement , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  F. Vidal,et al.  Event-Related Potentials as Indices of Time Processing: A Review , 2004 .

[25]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[26]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: Evidence from startle , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Fredrik Ullén,et al.  Independent processing of the temporal and ordinal structure of movement sequences. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Comments on the classic Henry And Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: resolving the issue of simple versus choice reaction time. , 2010, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  W. Sommer,et al.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor Planning, Not Execution, Separates Motor Memories , 2016, Neuron.

[32]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Sequence Learning in Patients with Parkinson's Disease or Cerebellar Lesions , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Keele,et al.  Timing Functions of The Cerebellum , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .