Psychological safety and social support in groupware adoption: A multi-level assessment in education

In this paper, the authors propose that psychological safety, a sense of interpersonal trust and being valued in a work team, is an important determinant of groupware technology adoption in an educational setting. They develop and test a model of antecedents and consequences of psychological safety. Data were collected from 361 university students, organized in 36 teams. Results of multi-level regression analysis reveal positive individual-level effects of perceived tutor support and perceived peer support on psychological safety. Furthermore, our findings show a positive unique group-level effect of perceived tutor support on psychological safety, where an individual's level of self-consciousness strengthens this positive impact. In addition, findings of structural equation modeling demonstrate that both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use partially mediate the positive effect of psychological safety on groupware usage. Psychological safety also shows a positive direct effect on groupware usage. Finally, a student's offline communication frequency with his tutor and peers appears to strengthen the impact of psychological safety on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and groupware usage.

[1]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Roy Rada,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in computer-supported peer-peer learning , 1998 .

[3]  Christina L. Stamper,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship Between Boundary Spanner Role Stress and Work Outcomes , 2003 .

[4]  L. Slone,et al.  The nonconsciousness of self-consciousness. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. Magnusson,et al.  Toward an interactional psychology of personality. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[8]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[9]  Yining Chen,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Groupware Application , 2000, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[10]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of the Service Climate in Boundary-Spanning Self-Managing Service Teams , 2004 .

[11]  L. James,et al.  Integrating Work Environment Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of Meaning , 1989 .

[12]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  LEVEL AND DISPERSION OF SATISFACTION IN TEAMS: USING FOCI AND SOCIAL CONTEXT TO EXPLAIN THE SATISFACTION-ABSENTEEISM RELATIONSHIP , 2007 .

[13]  Ton Mooij,et al.  Optimising ICT effectiveness in instruction and learning: multilevel transformation theory and a pilot project in secondary education , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  Bullying: From the Playground to the Boardroom , 2006 .

[15]  B Lakey,et al.  Environmental and personal determinants of support perceptions: three generalizability studies. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Luis L. Martins,et al.  A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course , 2004 .

[18]  Charlie C. Chen,et al.  Online Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Software Training Through the Behavioral Modeling Approach: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 2006, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[19]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  How a silver bullet may lose its shine , 2003, CACM.

[20]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Predicting openness and commitment to change , 2004 .

[21]  J GallivanMichael,et al.  Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on IT Usage in the Workplace , 2003 .

[22]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  A. Carmeli Social Capital, Psychological Safety and Learning Behaviours from Failure in Organisations , 2007 .

[24]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[25]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: an example of climate-satisfaction relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Christina L. Stamper,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship Between Boundary Spanner Role Stress and Work Outcomes , 2003 .

[27]  Connie R. Wanberg,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support. , 1986 .

[29]  R. Moenaert,et al.  The Adoption of Information Technology in the Sales Force , 2005 .

[30]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[31]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[32]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[33]  L. Slone,et al.  The nonconsciousness of self-consciousness. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Wim Veen,et al.  A virtual workshop as a tool for collaboration: towards a model of telematic learning environments , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[37]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on IT Usage in the Workplace , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of a Convergence in Understanding Between Technology Providers and Users on Information Technology Innovativeness , 1991 .

[40]  Manuel London,et al.  Relationships between climate, process, and performance in continuous quality improvement groups , 2006 .

[41]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[43]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[44]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Paul Harvey,et al.  Promoting Authentic Behavior in Organizations: An Attributional Perspective , 2006 .

[46]  Suzanne Zivnuska,et al.  The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Understanding Outcomes of Organizational Learning Interventions , 2003 .

[48]  K. Wentzel Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .

[49]  J. Hackman Group influences on individuals in organizations. , 1992 .

[50]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[51]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: an example of climate-satisfaction relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Ed Smeets,et al.  Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Sebastiano A. Fisicaro,et al.  "Environmental and personal determinants of support perceptions: Three generalizability studies.": Correction. , 1996 .

[54]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[55]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Perceived teacher support of student questioning in the college classroom: Its relation to student characteristics and role in the classroom questioning process. , 1994 .

[56]  D. Magnusson Toward A Psychology of Situations : An Interactional Perspective , 1981 .

[57]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[58]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[59]  Dale F. Duhan,et al.  Supervisor Communication Practices and Service Employee Job Outcomes , 2000 .

[60]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Making It Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams , 2006 .

[61]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens. , 2004 .

[63]  A. Edmondson Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[64]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[65]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[66]  James K. Harter,et al.  Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  L. Shrum,et al.  The measurement of personal values in survey research: a test of alternative rating procedures. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[68]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[69]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Roy D. Howell,et al.  An integrated model of sales managers’ communication practices , 2000 .

[71]  Séamas Kelly,et al.  Groupware and the Social Infrastructure of Communication , 2001, CACM.

[72]  D. Zohar A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Team learning from mistakes : the contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving , 2004 .

[74]  Colin Eden,et al.  “Horses for courses”: A stakeholder approach to the evaluation of GDSSs , 1996 .

[75]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[77]  N. Ashkanasy Roderick M. Kramer and Karen S. Cook (eds.), 2004. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Russell Hardin (ed.), 2004. Distrust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation , 2005 .

[78]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[79]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[80]  Douglas R. May,et al.  The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work , 2004 .

[81]  Kevin J. Valadares,et al.  The Practicality of Employee Empowerment: Supporting a Psychologically Safe Culture , 2004, The health care manager.

[82]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Renee Tynan The Effects of Threat Sensitivity and Face Giving on Dyadic Psychological Safety and Upward Communication1 , 2005 .

[84]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[85]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  On the Etiology of Climates. , 1983 .

[86]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[87]  Szu-Yuan Sun,et al.  Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[88]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[89]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[90]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[91]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[92]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[93]  M. Becerra,et al.  Perceived Trustworthiness Within The Organization: The Moderating Impact Of Communication Frequency , 2002 .

[94]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[95]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[96]  Ad de Jong,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[97]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Business Process Modeling with Group Support Systems , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Effect of Communication Frequency and Channel Richness on the Convergence Between Chief Executive and Chief Information Officers , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and Distrust In Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches , 2004 .

[100]  A. D. de Winter,et al.  Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[101]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[102]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  E-Mail Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication , 2003 .

[103]  A. Ryan,et al.  Early Adolescents' Perceptions of the Classroom Social Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Engagement. , 2007 .

[104]  Sumita Raghuram,et al.  Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support , 2001 .

[105]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[106]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[107]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .