The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies

This study examines the adoption of new technologies within organizations, The significance of this research is to broaden the understanding of technology adoption within organizations by focusing on adoption at the individual level, The key research question that is examined is: "what factors contribute to the adoption of new technology by individuals within firms?" A model is presented to distinguish adopters from nonadopters based on four sets of constructs: (1) the characteristics of the individual; (2) individual's perception of group characteristics; (3) individual's perception of company characteristics; and (4) individual's perception of technology. Unlike previous studies that focus only on top management in firms, this study examines adoption at the level of middle managers, engineers and technical personnel, i.e., those individuals who are more likely to actually use this technology in the workplace. The study links previously studied elements of adoption and diffusion of innovations to the specific case of a relatively recent innovation for organizations, As an example, an empirical examination of adoption of object-oriented technology (OT) in software companies is conducted. This technology is a software development technique that uses pretested and routine methods or "objects" to design, construct and assemble software programs. It is a new way of thinking about software based on abstraction that exists in the real world. The results of this study show that individual characteristics, perception of group characteristics and company characteristics are significantly related to OT adoption, but the individual's perception of the technology is not. The proposed model predicts adopters of new technology, such as OT, with 86% accuracy, The results suggest the factors that top management need to focus on in order to facilitate new technology adoption in firms.

[1]  V. Grover.  An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[2]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment , 1990 .

[3]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[4]  Ram C. Rao,et al.  The Role of Experience in Information use and Decision Making by Marketing Managers , 1990 .

[5]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos , 1985 .

[6]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[7]  M. A. Mcginnis,et al.  EFFECTIVE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: MISSING LINK IN STRATEGIC PLANNING? , 1983 .

[8]  David Wilemon,et al.  Assimilating information technology innovations: strategies and moderating influences , 1997 .

[9]  R. Archer,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of a Model of Knowledge Utilization , 1985 .

[10]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[11]  S. Piereson,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. By Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman, Jr. New York: Harper & Row, 1982 , 1983 .

[12]  E. Glassman,et al.  Managing for Creativity: back to basics in R&D , 1986 .

[13]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Organizational Adoption of Microcomputer Technology: The Role of Sector , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Measuring the Potential Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Strategic Variables , 1991 .

[15]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[16]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[17]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Modernization among Peasants: The Impact of Communication. , 1970 .

[18]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[19]  Margaret A. White,et al.  Management of technological innovation: Individual attitudes, stress, and work group attributes , 1990 .

[20]  D. Lehmann.  Market research and analysis , 1979 .

[21]  John K. Hemphill,et al.  Group dimensions : a manual for their measurement , 1956 .

[22]  P. Drucker.  The discipline of innovation. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[23]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm , 1984 .

[25]  J. Ettlie,et al.  The Adoption Time Period for Some Transportation Innovations , 1979 .

[26]  Harry Nyström,et al.  Creativity and Innovation , 1979 .

[27]  V. Lai,et al.  An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .

[28]  J. Baldridge,et al.  Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Impacts. , 1975 .

[29]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[30]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[31]  Judy Bayer,et al.  A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations , 1989, [1988] Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software track.

[32]  D. W. Barclay.  Interdepartmental Conflict in Organizational Buying: The Impact of the Organizational Context , 1991 .

[33]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Organizational Policy and Innovation Among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector , 1983 .

[34]  John J. Kao,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Organization , 1990 .

[35]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[36]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[37]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work:psychological perspectives , 1989 .

[38]  Arun Rai,et al.  An Organizational Context for CASE Innovation , 1993 .

[39]  William A. Fischer,et al.  Dimensions of innovative climate in Chinese R&D units , 1985 .

[40]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[41]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Éric Clémens,et al.  Telecom: hook up or lose out , 1986 .

[43]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[44]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[45]  Michael A. West,et al.  The social psychology of innovation in groups. , 1990 .

[46]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Models of Cooperative Group Decision-Making and Relative Influence: An Experimental Investigation of Family Purchase Decisions , 1987 .

[47]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[48]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[49]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  Worker participation: A critique of the literature and some fresh evidence , 1977 .

[50]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Implementing new technology: Management issues and opportunities , 1990 .

[51]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[52]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[53]  C. Rogers.  Toward a theory of creativity. , 1954 .

[54]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[55]  G. Wallas.  The art of thought , 1926 .

[56]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[57]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[58]  Anne Maass,et al.  Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity , 1983 .

[59]  J. Arndt.  Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[60]  V. A. Thompson.  Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[61]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[62]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[63]  Calvin W. Taylor.  CHAPTER 1 – Can Organizations Be Creative, Too? , 1972 .

[64]  E. Katz.  The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[65]  J. Pennings,et al.  The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry , 1992 .

[66]  Donald T. Popielarz.  An Exploration of Perceived Risk and Willingness to Try New Products , 1967 .

[67]  Tracy A. Westen.  Barriers to Creativity , 1978 .

[68]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[69]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 1991 .

[70]  R. Brown,et al.  Managing the “S” curves of innovation , 1992 .

[71]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[72]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Creativity Techniques in Product Planning and Development : A View from West Germany : R&D Management , 1983 .

[73]  George F. Farris.  The Technical Supervisor: Beyond the Peter Principle , 1974, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[74]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Innovation in working groups. , 1990 .

[75]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence , 1983 .

[76]  L. Jones.  Measuring Barriers to Creativity , 1988 .

[77]  J. Garber,et al.  Creative Scientists Rate Creativity Factors , 1971 .

[78]  J. Dutton,et al.  THE CREATION OF MOMENTUM FOR CHANGE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE DIAGNOSIS , 1987 .

[79]  R. Walton.  Organizational Context and Interdepartmental Conflict. , 1969 .

[80]  D. G. Morrison.  On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis , 1969 .

[81]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .