Augmented visual feedback of movement performance to enhance walking recovery after stroke: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that use of augmented visual feedback could be a useful approach to stroke rehabilitation. In current clinical practice, visual feedback of movement performance is often limited to the use of mirrors or video. However, neither approach is optimal since cognitive and self-image issues can distract or distress patients and their movement can be obscured by clothing or limited viewpoints. Three-dimensional motion capture has the potential to provide accurate kinematic data required for objective assessment and feedback in the clinical environment. However, such data are currently presented in numerical or graphical format, which is often impractical in a clinical setting. Our hypothesis is that presenting this kinematic data using bespoke visualisation software, which is tailored for gait rehabilitation after stroke, will provide a means whereby feedback of movement performance can be communicated in a more meaningful way to patients. This will result in increased patient understanding of their rehabilitation and will enable progress to be tracked in a more accessible way.MethodsThe hypothesis will be assessed using an exploratory (phase II) randomised controlled trial. Stroke survivors eligible for this trial will be in the subacute stage of stroke and have impaired walking ability (Functional Ambulation Classification of 1 or more). Participants (n = 45) will be randomised into three groups to compare the use of the visualisation software during overground physical therapy gait training against an intensity-matched and attention-matched placebo group and a usual care control group. The primary outcome measure will be walking speed. Secondary measures will be Functional Ambulation Category, Timed Up and Go, Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment, Stroke Impact Scale-16 and spatiotemporal parameters associated with walking. Additional qualitative measures will be used to assess the participant’s experience of the visual feedback provided in the study.DiscussionResults from the trial will explore whether the early provision of visual feedback of biomechanical movement performance during gait rehabilitation demonstrates improved mobility outcomes after stroke and increased patient understanding of their rehabilitation.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN79005974

[1]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[2]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  G. Wulf,et al.  Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[5]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  H. Hermens,et al.  Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Beevers,et al.  The atlas of heart disease and stroke , 2005, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[8]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  The test of everyday attention , 1994 .

[11]  Joy Adamson,et al.  Is stroke the most common cause of disability? , 2004, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[12]  S. Perera,et al.  Stroke Impact Scale-16 , 2003, Neurology.

[13]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[14]  L. Connell,et al.  The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  Yasser Salem,et al.  Overground physical therapy gait training for chronic stroke patients with mobility deficits. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Enrique Viosca,et al.  Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.