Conservation planning for successional landscapes

The systematic conservation planning literature invariably assumes that the biodiversity features being preserved in sites do not change through time. We develop a conservation planning framework for ecosystems where disturbance events and succession drive vegetation dynamics. The framework incorporates three key attributes of disturbance theory: heterogeneity in disturbance rates, spatial correlation between disturbance events and different impacts of disturbance. In our conservation problem we wish to maximise the chance that we represent a certain number of successional types given a cap on the number of sites we can conserve. Correlation between disturbance events dramatically complicates the problem of choosing the optimal suite of sites. However, in our problem we discover that spatial correlation in disturbances affects the optimal reserve network very little. The reason is twofold: (i) through our probabilistic framework we focus on the long-term effectiveness of reserve networks and (ii) in the dynamics considered in our model the state of a site is not only affected by the most recent (correlated) disturbance event but also by the site's long-term stochastic history which blurs the impact of spatial correlation. If successional states are the conservation target rather than individual species then, conserving a site can only contribute to meeting one target. However, given that correlation of disturbance events may be ignored, we show that if the number of candidate reserves is sufficiently large the statistical dependence of different conservation targets may be ignored, too. We conclude that the computational complexity of reserve selection methods for dynamic ecosystems can be much simpler than they first appear.

[1]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones , 1997 .

[2]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Area‐Based Refinement for Selection of Reserve Sites with the Benefit‐Function Approach , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Reinaldo Lourival.  Applications and implications of systematic planning for the Pantanal Wetland Biosphere Reserve - Brazil , 2008 .

[4]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[5]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept of large rivers: learning from the tropics. , 1999 .

[6]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Impacts of recruitment limitation and canopy disturbance on tropical tree species richness , 2007 .

[7]  Hong S. He,et al.  Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm , 2004 .

[8]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[9]  A. Huth,et al.  Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity? , 2005 .

[10]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[11]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[12]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  The role of habitat disturbance and recovery in metapopulation persistence. , 2006, Ecology.

[13]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes , 2005 .

[14]  J. Ward.  RIVERINE LANDSCAPES: BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS, DISTURBANCE REGIMES, AND AQUATIC CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[15]  Magnus Nyström,et al.  Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes , 2003, Ambio.

[16]  Athanasios S. Kallimanis,et al.  Metapopulation Extinction Risk under Spatially Autocorrelated Disturbance , 2005 .

[17]  T. G. Tutin.  The Hydrosere and Current Concepts of the Climax , 1941 .

[18]  M. Drechsler,et al.  Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species , 2003 .

[19]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: What is ‘Natural’ vegetation in a changing environment? , 1991 .

[20]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics , 2004 .

[21]  C. Heckman.  The Seasonal Succession of Biotic Communities in Wetlands of the Tropical Wet‐and‐Dry Climatic Zone: V. Aquatic Invertebrate Communities in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil , 1998 .

[22]  L. Klinger.  The Myth of the Classic Hydrosere Model of Bog Succession , 1996, Arctic and Alpine Research.

[23]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Population models for marine reserve design: A retrospective and prospective synthesis , 2003 .

[24]  R. Sparks,et al.  Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers , 1990 .

[25]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat Loss , 2003 .

[26]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  OPTIMAL FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR MAINTAINING COMMUNITY DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[27]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1985 .

[28]  F. Clements.  Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[29]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[30]  Karin Frank,et al.  Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival – from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  INCORPORATING METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS OF GREATER GLIDERS INTO RESERVE DESIGN IN DISTURBED LANDSCAPES , 1999 .

[32]  Grażyna Ł aska.  The disturbance and vegetation dynamics: a review and an alternative framework , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[33]  S. Ferson,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology , 2002, Springer New York.

[34]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[35]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Conservation in a Changing World , 1999 .

[36]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Hong S. He,et al.  Altered Fire Regimes Affect Landscape Patterns of Plant Succession in the Foothills and Mountains of Southern California , 2005, Ecosystems.

[38]  W. Sousa.  The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[39]  J. Franklin,et al.  The Roles of Spatial Heterogeneity and Ecological Processes in Conservation Planning , 2005 .

[40]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.