The Collaboration of Innovation Intermediaries and Manufacturing Firms in the Markets for Technology

Many manufacturing firms have opened up their product innovation processes and actively transfer knowledge with external partners in the markets for technology. However, the markets for technological knowledge have remained inefficient in comparison with the markets for most products. To reduce some of the market inefficiencies, manufacturing firms may collaborate with innovation intermediaries, which are defined as organizations that act as agents or brokers in the innovation process between two or more parties. These innovation intermediaries comprise different service providers ranging from consulting companies to Internet marketplaces for technology. In light of an increasing importance of intermediary services in the context of open innovation, this paper specifically focuses on the collaboration of manufacturing firms and innovation intermediaries, which may be critical for the success of intermediary services. Based on new interview data from 30 innovation intermediaries and 30 European manufacturing firms, this paper examines the question of how innovation intermediaries and manufacturing firms collaborate concerning the following issues, which emerged as the key themes from the interviews: potential of intermediation, roles of intermediaries, types of intermediation, drivers of intermediation, complementarity of intermediation, compensation of intermediation, and the importance of repeated collaborations. The findings indicate how manufacturing firms may reduce their transaction costs in technology markets by collaborating with intermediaries. However, intermediary services can only be regarded as a complement rather than a substitute of manufacturing firms' internal activities of managing technology transfer. Thus, manufacturing firms need sufficient internal capabilities for managing technology transfer, such as absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity.

[1]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The role of innovation intermediaries in the markets for technology , 2011 .

[2]  U. Lichtenthaler OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[3]  Zheng Yanning,et al.  Development of Chinese science and technology intermediaries and their integration into the open innovation paradigm , 2011 .

[4]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  Open innovation policy through intermediaries: the industry incubator programme in Norway , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Giuseppe Piroli,et al.  Efficiency and evaluation analysis of a network of technology transfer brokers , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  J. Hsuan,et al.  How Do Innovation Intermediaries Add Value? Insight from New Product Development in Fashion Markets , 2010 .

[7]  B. Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm , 2010 .

[8]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Technology Transfer across Organizational Boundaries: Absorptive Capacity and Desorptive Capacity , 2010 .

[9]  Mika Nieminen,et al.  How Necessary are Intermediary Organizations in the Commercialization of Research? , 2010 .

[10]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[11]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[12]  A. Arora,et al.  Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology , 2010 .

[13]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Introduction: Trading under the Buttonwood--a foreword to the markets for technology and ideas , 2010 .

[14]  Jan Henrik Sieg,et al.  Managerial Challenges in Open Innovation: A Study of Innovation Intermediation in the Chemical Industry , 2010 .

[15]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Heterogeneous Firm‐Level Effects of Knowledge Exchanges on Product Innovation: Differences between Dynamic and Lagging Product Innovators* , 2010 .

[16]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Brokerage in SME networks , 2010 .

[17]  M. Gibbert,et al.  The ‘‘What’’ and ‘‘How’’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work , 2010 .

[18]  Tommi Inkinen,et al.  Intermediaries in Regional Innovation Systems: High-Technology Enterprise Survey from Northern Finland , 2010 .

[19]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries , 2010 .

[20]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[21]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[22]  U. Lichtenthaler Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[23]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The Role of Champions in the External Commercialization of Knowledge , 2009 .

[24]  David M. Hart,et al.  Accounting for change in national systems of innovation: A friendly critique based on the U.S. case , 2009 .

[25]  Jelena Spanjol,et al.  How Many and What Kind? The Role of Strategic Orientation in New Product Ideation , 2009 .

[26]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Voices from the field: How exceptional electronic industrial innovators innovate , 2009 .

[27]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[28]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms , 2009 .

[29]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  The Licensing of Market Development Rights within Technology Alliances: A Shareholder Value Perspective , 2010 .

[30]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[31]  H. Ernst,et al.  Intermediary Services in the Markets for Technology: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Consequences , 2008 .

[32]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[33]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Technology Commercialization in Road Infrastructure: How Government Affects the Variation and Appropriability of Technology , 2008 .

[34]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  University Commercialization Strategies in the Development of Regional Bioclusters , 2008 .

[35]  H. Ernst,et al.  Innovation Intermediaries: Why Internet Marketplaces for Technology Have Not Yet Met the Expectations , 2008 .

[36]  R. Defillippi,et al.  A bridge over troubled waters: bridging organisations and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging sectors , 2007 .

[37]  G. Duysters,et al.  Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile Telephony , 2007 .

[38]  Graham M. Winch,et al.  The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An International Review , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[40]  S. Nambisan,et al.  A buyer's guide to the innovation bazaar. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[41]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[42]  D. Teece Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[43]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value , 2006 .

[44]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .

[45]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Innovation and Virtual Environments: Towards Virtual Knowledge Brokers , 2006 .

[46]  J. Howells Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[47]  Anssi Smedlund,et al.  The roles of intermediaries in a regional knowledge system , 2006 .

[48]  A. Gambardella,et al.  The Market for Patents in Europe , 2006 .

[49]  A. Agrawal Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge , 2006 .

[50]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[51]  Lars Schweizer ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INTO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES: THE NEED FOR A HYBRID APPROACH , 2005 .

[52]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. , 2005 .

[53]  Dong Zhu,et al.  A regional innovation system in a small-sized region: A clustering model in Zhongguancun Science Park , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[54]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation , 2005 .

[55]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[56]  Johan Frishammar,et al.  Managing External Information in Manufacturing Firms : The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2005 .

[57]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan☆ , 2005 .

[58]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[59]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  The Power of Innomediation , 2003 .

[60]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[61]  Donald Hislop,et al.  The client role in consultancy relations during the appropriation of technological innovations , 2002 .

[62]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[63]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[64]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[65]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Communities of Creation: Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets , 2000 .

[66]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Research and Technology Outsourcing and Innovation Systems: an Exploratory Analysis , 1999 .

[67]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[68]  T. A. Bryant,et al.  Technology brokers in the North American software industry: getting the most out of mismatched dyads , 1998 .

[69]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[70]  Martha Prevezer,et al.  UK biotechnology: institutional linkages, technology transfer and the role of intermediaries , 1996 .

[71]  L. Lynn,et al.  Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework , 1996 .

[72]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[73]  Francis Bidault,et al.  Technology transactions: networks over markets , 1994 .

[74]  Martyn Cordey-Hayes,et al.  The development and application of interactive models of industrial technology transfer , 1993 .

[75]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[76]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[77]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .