BIRDS IN A BUSH: FIVE GENES INDICATE EXPLOSIVE EVOLUTION OF AVIAN ORDERS

All recent studies of bird phylogeny have produced poorly resolved relationships among the orders of Neoaves, the lineage that includes most modern birds. This ‘‘bush’’ result suggests the possibility of an explosive and potentially unresolvable evolutionary radiation. However, simultaneous radiations of multiple lineages are thought to be rare or nonexistent in nature and difficult to corroborate empirically because lack of phylogenetic resolution can also be caused by analytical artifacts. Here we examine the predictions of the explosive radiation hypothesis for five independent genetic datasets for Neoaves. We propose a methodology for testing for polytomies of evolutionary lineages, perform likelihood-ratio tests to compare trees with zero-length branches to more resolved trees, compare topologies between independent gene trees, and propose a power test for the SOWH test. The evidence of (1) extremely short (in some cases zero-length) branches for interordinal relationships across independent gene trees and (2) topological incongruence among gene trees suggests that the bird tree includes essentially simultaneous radiation of multiple lineages. This result explains why a robust phylogeny of birds has not been produced despite much effort on the part of avian systematists.

[1]  K. Johnson,et al.  Taxon sampling and the phylogenetic position of Passeriformes: evidence from 916 avian cytochrome b sequences. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[2]  Johansson,et al.  Clades within the 'higher land birds', evaluated by nuclear DNA sequences , 2001 .

[3]  K. Kidd,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis: concepts and methods. , 1971, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  V. Friesen,et al.  POWER AND STOCHASTICITY IN THE RESOLUTION OF SOFT POLYTOMIES: A REPLY TO BRAUN ET AL , 2001 .

[5]  J. Felsenstein Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[6]  W. Maddison RECONSTRUCTING CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON POLYTOMOUS CLADOGRAMS , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[7]  Michael M. Miyamoto,et al.  TESTING SPECIES PHYLOGENIES AND PHYLOGENETIC METHODS WITH CONGRUENCE , 1995 .

[8]  S. Hedges,et al.  Convergence and divergence in the evolution of aquatic birds , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Yoshio Tateno,et al.  Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data , 1983, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  G. Barrowclough,et al.  Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  J. Doyle,et al.  Gene Trees and Species Trees: Molecular Systematics as One-Character Taxonomy , 1992 .

[12]  D. Mindell,et al.  More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Kevin de Queiroz,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships and Tempo of Early Diversification in Anolis Lizards , 1999 .

[14]  Michael D. Hendy,et al.  A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees , 1989 .

[15]  S. Hedges,et al.  Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[17]  S. Hedges,et al.  The early history of modern birds inferred from DNA sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal genes. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[19]  J. Slowinski,et al.  Molecular polytomies. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.