Gene expression and digit homology in the chicken embryo wing

Summary The bird wing is of special interest to students of homology and avian evolution. Fossil and developmental data give conflicting indications of digit homology if a pentadactyl “archetype” is assumed. Morphological signs of a vestigial digit I are seen in bird embryos, but no digit‐like structure develops in wild‐type embryos. To examine the developmental mechanisms of digit loss, we studied the expression of the high‐mobility group box containing Sox9 gene, and bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1b (bmpR‐1b)—markers for precondensation and prechondrogenic cells, respectively. We find an elongated domain of Sox9 expression, but no bmpR‐1b expression, anterior to digit II. We interpret this as a digit I domain that reaches precondensation, but not condensation or precartilage stages. It develops late, when the tissue in which it is lodged is being remodeled. We consider these findings in the light of previous Hoxd‐11 misexpression studies. Together, they suggest that there is a digit I vestige in the wing that can be rescued and undergo development if posterior patterning cues are enhanced. We observed Sox9 expression in the elusive “element X” that is sometimes stated to represent a sixth digit. Indeed, incongruity between digit domains and identities in theropods disappears if birds and other archosaurs are considered primitively polydactyl. Our study provides the first gene expression evidence for at least five digital domains in the chick wing. The failure of the first to develop may be plausibly linked to attenuation of posterior signals.

[1]  S. Chatterjee Counting the Fingers of Birds and Dinosaurs , 1998, Science.

[2]  D. Duboule,et al.  Regulation of number and size of digits by posterior Hox genes: a dose-dependent mechanism with potential evolutionary implications. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Alberch,et al.  The development and homology of the chelonian carpus and tarsus , 1985, Journal of morphology.

[4]  L. Chiappe,et al.  The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the late cretaceous of madagascar , 1998, Science.

[5]  Robert L. Carroll,et al.  Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution , 1988 .

[6]  Nils Holmgren ON THE ORIGIN OF THE TETRAPOD LIMB , 1933 .

[7]  P. Alberch,et al.  CAENOGENESIS, DEVELOPMENTAL VARIABILITY, AND EVOLUTION IN THE CARPUS AND TARSUS OF THE MARBLED NEWT TRITURUS MARMORATUS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  R. Thulborn,et al.  The Reptilian Relationships of Archaeopteryx , 1982 .

[9]  W. Montagna A Re‐investigation of the development of the wing of the fowl , 1945 .

[10]  H. Osborn Skeletal Adaptations of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus , 1916 .

[11]  P. Sharpe,et al.  Regulation and role of Sox9 in cartilage formation , 1999, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[12]  A. P. S. Luca The postcranial skeleton of Heterodontosaurus tucki lReptiliac Ornithischiar from the Stormberg of South Africa , 1980 .

[13]  C. Tickle,et al.  Digital development and morphogenesis , 2003, Journal of anatomy.

[14]  J. Clack,et al.  An amniote-like skeleton from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland , 1999, Nature.

[15]  M. Coates,et al.  Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs , 1990, Nature.

[16]  P. Barrett,et al.  An exceptionally preserved Lower Cretaceous ecosystem , 2003, Nature.

[17]  M. Richardson,et al.  Time, pattern, and heterochrony: a study of hyperphalangy in the dolphin embryo flipper , 2002, Evolution & development.

[18]  A. Joyner,et al.  Dynamic Changes in the Response of Cells to Positive Hedgehog Signaling during Mouse Limb Patterning , 2004, Cell.

[19]  L. Niswander,et al.  BMPs are required at two steps of limb chondrogenesis: formation of prechondrogenic condensations and their differentiation into chondrocytes. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[20]  C. Gegenbaur Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden anatomie der wirbelthiere , 1864 .

[21]  P. Sereno The pectoral girdle and forelimb of the basal theropod Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis , 1994 .

[22]  J. Gauthier Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds , 1986 .

[23]  P. Christiansen,et al.  Body plumage in Archaeopteryx: a review, and new evidence from the Berlin specimen , 2004 .

[24]  R. Dahn,et al.  Interdigital regulation of digit identity and homeotic transformation by modulated BMP signaling. , 2000, Science.

[25]  P. Alberch,et al.  A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb , 1986 .

[26]  P. Sereno,et al.  The evolution of dinosaurs. , 1999, Science.

[27]  P. Beachy,et al.  Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[28]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[29]  G. Wagner,et al.  Pentadactyl ground state of the avian wing. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[30]  M. Norell,et al.  The distribution of integumentary structures in a feathered dinosaur , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[32]  D. Duboule,et al.  A Dual Role for Hox Genes in Limb Anterior-Posterior Asymmetry , 2004, Science.

[33]  Marie-Christine Chaboissier,et al.  The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. , 2002, Genes & development.

[34]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Phylogenetic definitions and nomenclature of the major taxonomic categories of the carnivorous Dinosauria (Theropoda) , 1999 .

[35]  John H. Ostrom,et al.  Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds , 1976 .

[36]  C. Tabin,et al.  Proximodistal patterning of the limb: insights from evolutionary morphology , 2004, Evolution & development.

[37]  A. Feduccia 1,2,3 = 2,3,4: accommodating the cladogram. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Norell,et al.  Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China , 1998, Nature.

[39]  L. Biesecker Polydactyly: how many disorders and how many genes? , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.

[40]  J. Rodríguez-León,et al.  Analysis of the molecular cascade responsible for mesodermal limb chondrogenesis: Sox genes and BMP signaling. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[41]  G. Wagner,et al.  1,2,3 = 2,3,4: a solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  M. Kundrát,et al.  Pentadactyl pattern of the avian wing autopodium and pyramid reduction hypothesis. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[43]  P. Barnes,et al.  In situ hybridization. , 1997, Methods in molecular biology.

[44]  Clifford J. Tabin,et al.  A re-examination of proximodistal patterning during vertebrate limb development , 2002, Nature.

[45]  G. Wagner,et al.  Old morphologies misinterpreted. , 2003 .

[46]  J. Clarke,et al.  Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. , 1997, Development.

[47]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Double anterior chick limb buds and models for cartilage rudiment specification. , 1990, Development.

[48]  J. GRAHAM KERR,et al.  The Osteology of the Reptiles , 1926, Nature.

[49]  Nils Holmgren AN EMBRYOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MAMMALIAN CARPUS AND ITS BEARING UPON THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGIN OF THE TETRAPOD LIMB , 1952 .

[50]  C. Tabin,et al.  Evidence for an Expansion-Based Temporal Shh Gradient in Specifying Vertebrate Digit Identities , 2004, Cell.

[51]  M. Hecht,et al.  The paleobiology and phylogenetic position of Archaeopteryx , 1982 .

[52]  H. Iwasawa,et al.  Geographic Variation in the Pes of the Salamander Hynobius lichenatus : A Comparison with Tetradactyl Hynobius hidamontanus and Pentadactyl Hynobius nigrescens , 1993 .

[53]  C. Tabin,et al.  Targeted misexpression of Hox-4.6 in the avian limb bud causes apparent homeotic transformations , 1992, Nature.

[54]  E. Wagner,et al.  Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[55]  A. Economides,et al.  Morphogenesis of digits in the avian limb is controlled by FGFs, TGFbetas, and noggin through BMP signaling. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[56]  J. Clack,et al.  An early tetrapod from ‘Romer's Gap’ , 2002, Nature.

[57]  Jane A. Langdale,et al.  In situ Hybridization , 1994 .

[58]  Ann C. Burke,et al.  Developmental Patterns and the Identification of Homologies in the Avian Hand , 1997 .

[59]  P. Alberch,et al.  Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Colchicine-induced digital loss and reduction. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[60]  D. Wilson,et al.  A scanning electron microscopic study of the normal development of the chick wing from stages 19 to 36 , 1994, Anatomy and Embryology.

[61]  J. R. Hinchliffe,et al.  Homology of the Bird Wing Skeleton , 1984 .

[62]  Christine Hartmann,et al.  Wnt-14 Plays a Pivotal Role in Inducing Synovial Joint Formation in the Developing Appendicular Skeleton , 2001, Cell.

[63]  G. Wagner,et al.  Heterochronic differences of Hoxa-11 expression in Xenopus fore- and hind limb development: Evidence for lower limb identity of the anuran ankle bones , 1998, Development Genes and Evolution.

[64]  M. Hecht,et al.  A reconsideration of the reptilian relationships of Archaeopteryx , 1980 .