Phase II multicenter, uncontrolled trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer

This trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In this multinational, open-label phase II study, patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were continuously treated with oral sorafenib, 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was overall best response; a secondary endpoint was percentage of patients with stable disease for ≥16 weeks. Biomarker analyses were also performed. Of the 56 patients enrolled into the study, 54 were treated with at least one dose of sorafenib. Partial response was observed in one patient (2%) and stable disease in 20 patients (37%); no complete responses were observed. Disease stabilization for ≥16 weeks was seen in 12 patients (22%); stabilization for ≥6 months in seven patients (13%). The most common drug-related grade 3 adverse events were rash/desquamation (6%), hand–foot skin reaction (4%), and fatigue (4%). Baseline vascular endothelial growth factor levels, levels of soluble epidermal growth factor receptor during treatment and both baseline and changes in soluble human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 levels correlated significantly with clinical outcomes. Although the primary endpoint of overall response rate showed minimal improvement on sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily treatment, the rate of disease stabilization was encouraging in patients treated with one or more lines of chemotherapy. The treatment had a clinically manageable toxicity profile. Further investigation of single-agent sorafenib in this patient population is not recommended; however, studies investigating combinations of sorafenib with chemotherapeutic agents are warranted and ongoing.

[1]  C. Robert,et al.  Dermatologic symptoms associated with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. , 2009, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  S. Paggi,et al.  Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2008 .

[3]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  V. D’Hondt,et al.  Selected combination therapy with sorafenib: a review of clinical data and perspectives in advanced solid tumors. , 2008, The oncologist.

[5]  N. Harbeck,et al.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of bevacizumab with docetaxel or docetaxel with placebo as first-line therapy for patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AVADO. , 2008 .

[6]  X. Pivot,et al.  The potential of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in metastatic breast cancer: clinical experience with anti-angiogenic agents, focusing on bevacizumab. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[7]  G. Linette,et al.  Double-blind randomized phase II study of the combination of sorafenib and dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: a report from the 11715 Study Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  H. Rugo,et al.  Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Takimoto,et al.  Safety and anti-tumor activity of sorafenib (Nexavar®) in combination with other anti-cancer agents: a review of clinical trials , 2008, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[11]  John Smeraglia,et al.  Circulating protein biomarkers of pharmacodynamic activity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: modulation of VEGF and VEGF-related proteins , 2007, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[12]  J. Elting,et al.  Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Survival and biomarker analysis , 2007 .

[13]  W. Carney Circulating oncoproteins HER2/neu, EGFR and CAIX (MN) as novel cancer biomarkers , 2007, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[14]  Apurva A Desai,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  W. Carney,et al.  Serum epidermal growth factor receptor/HER‐2 predicts poor survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[16]  S. Rafii,et al.  The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR‐1) supports growth and survival of human breast carcinoma , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[17]  D. Amadori,et al.  Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  G. Rosner,et al.  Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Hilsenbeck,et al.  Elevated expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 3 in breast tumors: a mechanism of tamoxifen resistance. , 2006, Cancer research.

[20]  R. Neumann,et al.  Prognostic and predictive impact of soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) protein in the serum of patients treated with chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2006, Anticancer research.

[21]  R. Figlin,et al.  Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Surrogate markers for antiangiogenic therapy and dose-limiting toxicities for bevacizumab with radiation and chemotherapy: continued experience of a phase I trial in rectal cancer patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  W. Carney,et al.  Serum HER‐2/neu conversion to positive at the time of disease progression in patients with breast carcinoma on hormone therapy , 2005, Cancer.

[24]  J. Wood,et al.  Soluble markers for the assessment of biological activity with PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer from two phase I trials. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  C. Hudis,et al.  Serum HER2 extracellular domain in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel: association with HER2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization and with response rate. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  D. Auclair,et al.  BAY 43-9006 Exhibits Broad Spectrum Oral Antitumor Activity and Targets the RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Involved in Tumor Progression and Angiogenesis , 2004, Cancer Research.

[27]  R. Neumann,et al.  The course of serum HER-2/neu levels as an independent prognostic factor for survival in metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Oncology reports.

[28]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Is breast cancer survival improving? , 2004, Cancer.

[29]  W. Gullick,et al.  The type I growth factor receptors in human breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  G. Sledge,et al.  A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[31]  S. Eppenberger-Castori,et al.  Potential prognostic value of mitogen‐activated protein kinase activity for disease‐free survival of primary breast cancer patients , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[32]  R. Paridaens,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor measured in platelet poor plasma allows optimal separation between cancer patients and volunteers: a key to study an angiogenic marker in vivo? , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  R. Zeillinger,et al.  Tissue expression and serum levels of HER-2/neu in patients with breast cancer. , 1997, Oncology.

[34]  G. Nuovo,et al.  Hyperexpression of mitogen-activated protein kinase in human breast cancer. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[35]  N. Normanno,et al.  Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. , 1995, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[36]  K. Kuroi,et al.  Prognostic significance of co-expression of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein and epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer patients. , 1992, American journal of surgery.