Towards Data-Driven Dynamic Surrogate Models for Ocean Flow

Coarse graining of (geophysical) flow problems is a necessity brought upon us by the wide range of spatial and temporal scales present in these problems, which cannot be all represented on a numerical grid without an inordinate amount of computational resources. Traditionally, the effect of the unresolved eddies is approximated by deterministic closure models, i.e. so-called parameterizations. The effect of the unresolved eddy field enters the resolved-scale equations as a forcing term, denoted as the 'eddy forcing'. Instead of creating a deterministic parameterization, our goal is to infer a stochastic, data-driven surrogate model for the eddy forcing from a (limited) set of reference data, with the goal of accurately capturing the long-term flow statistics. Our surrogate modelling approach essentially builds on a resampling strategy, where we create a probability density function of the reference data that is conditional on (time-lagged) resolved-scale variables. The choice of resolved-scale variables, as well as the employed time lag, is essential to the performance of the surrogate. We will demonstrate the effect of different modelling choices on a simplified ocean model of two-dimensional turbulence in a doubly periodic square domain.

[1]  Tim Palmer,et al.  Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  P. Berloff Random-forcing model of the mesoscale oceanic eddies , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  James Kent,et al.  Cascades, backscatter and conservation in numerical models of two‐dimensional turbulence , 2014 .

[4]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Data-driven stochastic representations of unresolved features in multiscale models, , 2016 .

[5]  R. Peyret Spectral Methods for Incompressible Viscous Flow , 2002 .

[6]  PierGianLuca Porta Mana,et al.  Toward a stochastic parameterization of ocean mesoscale eddies , 2014 .

[7]  P. Gent,et al.  Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models , 1990 .

[8]  Stefan P. Domino,et al.  A Framework for Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Large-Eddy Simulation Closures , 2018 .

[9]  M. Eldred,et al.  Comparison of Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation Methods for Uncertainty Quantification , 2009 .

[10]  A note on ‘Toward a stochastic parameterization of ocean mesoscale eddies’ , 2017 .

[11]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Data-Free and Data-Driven RANS Predictions with Quantified Uncertainty , 2018 .

[12]  D. Crommelin,et al.  REDUCED MODEL-ERROR SOURCE TERMS FOR FLUID FLOW , 2019, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering (UNCECOMP 2019).

[13]  Geometric Decomposition of Eddy Feedbacks in Barotropic Systems , 2015 .

[14]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  C. Severijns,et al.  A maximum entropy approach to the parametrization of subgrid processes in two‐dimensional flow , 2016 .

[16]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Covariate-based stochastic parameterization of baroclinic ocean eddies , 2017 .

[17]  PierGianLuca Porta Mana,et al.  Scale-aware deterministic and stochastic parametrizations of eddy-mean flow interaction , 2017 .

[18]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Stochastic Physics and Climate Modelling , 2018 .

[19]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Parameterization with Conditional Markov Chains , 2008 .

[20]  Prakash Vedula,et al.  Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.