Abstract The problem of the conservation of historical monuments (statues, columns, ancient buildings) requires an accurate study of the many environmental agents which bring about the deterioration process and affect the actual rate of deterioration. Among the most active causes of weathering, we can cite: (i) the weakening of the outer layer of the art work, which is caused by complex microphysical effects and is in particular due to wetting of the monument (a comparison between the effects of rainwater and condensation is made); (ii) the chemico-physical action of pollutants captured in both the dry and wet phase. the destructive processes depend on many factors: the past history of the monument, the capture and nature of the pollutants, and the frequency of some microclimatic conditions, particularly those supplying the water necessary for chemical reactions. to this end studies of diurnal and seasonal variations on the monument of both the heat wave and the fluxes of moisture and energy are very important. Some of these processes have been shown with microclimatic studies and microphysical investigation associated with mineralogic and chemical analyses of samples of weathered material. Mathematical models in some cases (especially for solarradiation and temperature) permit physical simulation, reconstruction of past data and extrapolation into the future observation of many monuments from different epochs, situated at various sites, gives examples of the fundamental processes that are often associated with, or masked by, other effects. The main weathering processes are due to the combined action of rainwater and atmospheric pollutants (particularly the carbonaceous particlesdue to combustion) deposited on the surface of the monument. The way in which the surface is wetted is very important: in fact, as hortdrizzle can activate the dry deposit without washing it away, and i n this case the pH of rain dro plets is of secondary importance; on the other hand, showers supply abundant water which favours dissolution of the stone and removal of the solute, resultingin athinning of the original rock. Another important factor is the dynamic regime (i. e. laminar or turbulent) of the water flowing over the surface of the monument. In zones where the surface of marble or calcareous monuments is only wetted, but protected from run-off, black crusts (characterized by crystals of gypsum and calcite with carbonaceous particles embedded in the crusts) are formed. Zones subjected t o heavy run-off are also subjected to a thinning of the rock and small authentic calcite crys tals form that are white in appearance. In the case of relatively unpolluted towns, where marble and limestone sulphation is not the main cause of the deterioration process, biological deterioration mechanisms are often very important, due to the activity of epilithic and endolithic microflora and microfauna. The case of particularly precious mortars, i.e. mals or frescces, is discussed in order to clarify the thermodynamic mthcd proposed for the analysis of qrimental campaigns. Finally actions are described that act on the causes and not only an the effects.
[1]
M. Monte,et al.
Air pollution and stone decay: the case of Venice
,
1985
.
[2]
Dario Camuffo,et al.
Indoor dynamic climatology: investigations on the interactions between walls and indoor environment
,
1983
.
[4]
Computing the flux of moisture from net radiation and soil wetness
,
1982
.
[5]
Todor Stambolov,et al.
The deterioration and conservation of porous building materials in monuments : a review of the literature
,
1976
.
[6]
D. Camuffo,et al.
A first-order analysis of the heat wave in the soil
,
1984
.
[7]
C. Sabbioni,et al.
Morphology and mineralogy of fly ash from a coal-fueled power plant
,
1984
.
[8]
Adriana Bernardi,et al.
Microclimate and weathering of a historical building: The Ducal Palace in Urbino
,
1985
.
[9]
Dario Camuffo,et al.
The pH of the atmospheric precipitation in Venice, related to both the dynamics of precipitation events and the weathering of monuments
,
1984
.
[10]
Cristina Sabbioni,et al.
Airborne carbon particles and marble deterioration
,
1981
.
[11]
D. Camuffo,et al.
AN EMPIRICAL FORMULA FOR AN ACCURATE EVALUATION OF THE FLUX DENSITY OF NET RADIATION
,
1985
.
[12]
O. Vittori.
Transient stefan flow and thermophoresis around an evaporating droplet
,
1984
.
[13]
C. Sabbioni,et al.
Crystal growth from carbonaceous particles
,
1984
.
[14]
C. Sabbioni,et al.
Origin and growth mechanisms of the sulfated crusts on urban limestone
,
1983
.
[15]
Adriana Bernardi,et al.
An observational study of heat fluxes and their relationships with net radiation
,
1982
.
[16]
Dario Camuffo,et al.
A dew point signaller for conservation of works of art
,
1986,
Environmental monitoring and assessment.
[17]
P Brimblecombe,et al.
London air pollution, 1500-1900.
,
1977,
Atmospheric environment.
[18]
C. Sabbioni,et al.
Characterization of the particulate emission by a large oil fuel fired power plant
,
1983
.
[19]
R. E. Ruskin,et al.
Humidity and Moisture
,
1966
.
[20]
Paul N. Banks,et al.
Indoor air pollution: Effects on cultural and historic materials
,
1985
.
[21]
D. Camuffo.
The influence of run-off on weathering of monuments
,
1984
.
[22]
Cristina Sabbioni,et al.
Urban stone sulphation and oil-fired carbonaceous particles
,
1984
.
[23]
C. Sabbioni,et al.
Weddellite on limestone in the Venice [Italy] environment.
,
1983,
Environmental science & technology.
[24]
P. Brimblecombe.
“Dew” as a sink for sulphur dioxide
,
1978
.
[25]
Dario Camuffo.
Condensation-evaporation cycles in pore and capillary systems according to the Kelvin model
,
1984
.
[26]
Dario Camuffo,et al.
Wetting, deterioration and visual features of stone surfaces in an urban area
,
1982
.