Trophallaxis-inspired model for distributed transport between randomly interacting agents.

Trophallaxis, the regurgitation and mouth to mouth transfer of liquid food between members of eusocial insect societies, is an important process that allows the fast and efficient dissemination of food in the colony. Trophallactic systems are typically treated as a network of agent interactions. This approach, though valuable, does not easily lend itself to analytic predictions. In this work we consider a simple trophallactic system of randomly interacting agents with finite carrying capacity, and calculate analytically and via a series of simulations the global food intake rate for the whole colony as well as observables describing how uniformly the food is distributed within the nest. Our model and predictions provide a useful benchmark to assess to what level the observed food uptake rates and efficiency in food distribution is due to stochastic effects or specific trophallactic strategies by the ant colony. Our work also serves as a stepping stone to describing the collective properties of more complex trophallactic systems, such as those including division of labor between foragers and workers.

[1]  S. Pérez-Espona Ant Encounters. Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior Ant Encounters. Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior. By Deborah Gordon. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press (2010). Pp. xiv+167. Price £13.95 paperback. , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Active Brownian particles , 2012, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[3]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Feeding and Stocking Up: Radio-Labelled Food Reveals Exchange Patterns in Ants , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Gerald S. Wilkinson,et al.  Food Sharing in Vampire Bats , 1990 .

[7]  C. Melhuish,et al.  Robot Trophallaxis : Managing Energy Autonomy in Multiple Robots , 2004 .

[8]  Richard James,et al.  Temporal dynamics and network analysis , 2012 .

[9]  J. Fewell Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[10]  Ofer Feinerman,et al.  Ant trophallactic networks: simultaneous measurement of interaction patterns and food dissemination , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  F. Peruani,et al.  Fluctuations and the role of collision duration in reaction-diffusion systems , 2013, 1305.4466.

[12]  H. J. Herrmann,et al.  Scaling of the propagation of epidemics in a system of mobile agents , 2004 .

[13]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  From individual to collective displacements in heterogeneous environments. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Rebeca B Rosengaus,et al.  Trophallaxis and prophylaxis: social immunity in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus , 2011, Biology Letters.

[15]  James S. Waters,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insect Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Jean-Pierre Eckmann,et al.  Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Fernando Peruani,et al.  Dynamics and steady states in excitable mobile agent systems. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[18]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances , 2014 .

[19]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Proceedings of: The First IEEE / RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. BioRob 2006: Foreword , 2006 .

[20]  Serge Goldman,et al.  Collective regulatory stock management and spatiotemporal dynamics of the food flow in ants , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[21]  A. Crespi,et al.  Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization , 2013, Science.

[22]  Richard James,et al.  Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Trophallaxis Mediates Uniformity of Colony Odor in Cataglyphis iberica Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[24]  N. Franks,et al.  Spatial relationships within nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Noa Pinter-Wollman,et al.  Persistent variation in spatial behavior affects the structure and function of interaction networks , 2015 .

[26]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.