A Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Behavior of Three Gap Models at Sites in Northeastern China

Three gap models, KOPIDE, NEWCOP, and ForClim, were compared with respect to their structure and behavior at four sites along an elevational gradient on Changbai Mt., northeastern China, under current climate and six climate change scenarios. This study intends to compare the three gap models under identical conditions, using a standardized simulation protocol. The three models were originally developed with different backgrounds and for different purposes. While they are relatively similar in the level of structural detail they include, they still differ in many respects regarding the assumptions that are made for representing specific ecological processes.The simulations showed that none of the three gap models provides satisfactory results in all situations; each gap model has strong and weak points in its behavior. While all models are fairly successful in simulating the composition of dominant species along the gradient under current climatic conditions, their projections under a set of hypothetical scenarios of climatic change diverge rather strongly. The analysis of these simulation results shows that several problem areas need to be addressed before any of the models can be used for a reliable impact assessment.Recommendations for improvements of the models are made, including the formulation of temperature and drought effects on tree establishment and tree growth, the size of the species pool, the appropriate choice of patch size and disturbance regimes, and allometric relationships. When aiming to use gap models under new environmental conditions, we propose to carefully reconsider their formulations based on our knowledge of the relevant processes in the region under concern, instead of using the models in an `as-is' mode.

[1]  H. Bugmann.  A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients , 1996 .

[2]  L. Cook,et al.  Moth, melanism and clean air. , 1975, Scientific American.

[3]  W. Cramer,et al.  Improving the behaviour of forest gap models along drought gradients , 1998 .

[4]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Recent progress and results from the project for the intercomparison of landsurface parameterization schemes , 1998 .

[5]  Harald Bugmann.  Anthropogene Klimaveranderung, Sukzessionsprozesse und forstwirtschaftliche Optionen , 1999 .

[6]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  How Much Physiology Is Needed in Forest Gap Models for Simulating Long-Term Vegetation Response to Global Change? Introduction , 2001 .

[7]  H. Bugmann.  A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[8]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  Sensitivity of forests in the European Alps to future climatic change , 1997 .

[9]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  EXPLAINING FOREST COMPOSITION AND BIOMASS ACROSS MULTIPLE BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS , 2000 .

[10]  A role-type model (rope) and its application in assessing climate change impacts on forest landscapes , 1995 .

[11]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Tree Mortality in Gap Models: Application to Climate Change , 2001 .

[12]  C. W. Thornthwaite,et al.  Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance , 1955 .

[13]  M. Sykes,et al.  A comparison of forest gap models: Model structure and behaviour , 1996 .

[14]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  The use of a European forest model in North America: a study of ecosystem response to climate gradients , 1995 .

[15]  H. Bugmann.  Gap models, forest dynamics and the response of vegetation to climate change , 1997 .

[16]  T. Whitmore,et al.  Forest succession , 1985, Nature.

[17]  Guofan Shao,et al.  Dynamic simulations of mixed broadleaved-Pinus koraiensis forests in the Changbaishan Biosphere Reserve of China , 1994 .

[18]  D. Botkin.  Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model , 1993 .

[19]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests , 1995 .

[20]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Below-Ground Processes in Gap Models for Simulating Forest Response to Global Change , 2001 .

[21]  P. Martín,et al.  EXE: a Climatically Sensitive Model to Study Climate Change and CO2 Enhancement Effects on Forests , 1992 .

[22]  M. Benarie.  A theory of forest dynamics , 1986 .

[23]  H. Shugart.  Terrestrial Ecosystems in Changing Environments , 1998 .

[24]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Large-Scale Changes of Soil Wetness Induced by an Increase in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 1987 .

[25]  G. Shao.  Potential impacts of climate change on a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest stand: A gap model approach , 1996 .

[26]  G. Mohren,et al.  Sensitivity of FORGRO to climatic change scenarios: A case study on Betula pubescens, Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur in The Netherlands , 1996 .

[27]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  On the ecology of mountainous forests in a changing climate , 1994 .

[28]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Aboveground Growth and Competition in Forest Gap Models: An Analysis for Studies of Climatic Change , 2001 .

[29]  W. Cramer,et al.  Regional impacts of climatic change on forests in the state of Brandenburg, Germany , 1997 .

[30]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Tree Species Composition in European Pristine Forests: Comparison of Stand Data to Model Predictions , 2001 .

[31]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Regeneration in Gap Models: Priority Issues for Studying Forest Responses to Climate Change , 2001 .