A transportation programming model considering project interdependency and regional balance

Transportation Programming (TP) plays an important role in the development of the infrastructure of a country. Given the limited budget, it is a challenging decision to select the projects to be funded and implemented from the numerous options. The problem is complicated by the fact that some of the potential projects are interdependent. The benefit (and/or the cost) of the joint project combining multiple projects can be different from the sum of the benefits (and/or the costs) if the associated projects are implemented separately. Besides, some projects cannot be selected at the same time as they are incompatible or exclusive to each other by nature. The typical examples are the projects utilizing the same resource, such as a piece of land. In addition, much more attention nowadays is paid to the fairness of budget allocation and the balance of regional development as the society becomes more democratic and diversified. Thus, in order to address the equity issue and the political feasibility, a new integer programming (IP) model based on the set covering problem (SCP) has been proposed to ensure that the regional balance issue is addressed. This SCP-based model, with the constraints taking into account the budget limitation and the projects’ mutual exclusivity, is transformed into a linear programming (LP) model by Lagrangian Relaxation (LR). The key theme of this study is then to design the solution algorithm that can efficiently adjust the LP multipliers and find the feasible solutions so as to achieve a high-quality approximate solution within an acceptable computation time. Finally, a numerical experiment that can reflect the practical situations is performed to validate the applicability of the developed model and solution algorithm.

[1]  Yuanqing Wang,et al.  A Heuristic Approach for Selecting Highway Investment Alternatives , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[2]  S. Salhi,et al.  A survey of effective heuristics and their application to a variety of knapsack problems , 2007 .

[3]  J. Beasley A lagrangian heuristic for set‐covering problems , 1990 .

[4]  Rhonda Young,et al.  Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: example of planning choice in transportation. , 2010, Evaluation and program planning.

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING APPROACH FOR SELECTING NON-INDEPENDENT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES , 1996 .

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Transportation investment project selection using fuzzy multiobjective programming , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes,et al.  Modelling interdependencies among urban transportation system alternatives within a multicriteria ranking framework , 1990 .

[8]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  Transport–Regional Equity Issue Revisited , 2010 .

[9]  Salim Haddadi,et al.  Simple Lagrangian heuristic for the set covering problem , 1997 .

[10]  Jeffrey Brown Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2008 .

[11]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  The Traveling-Salesman Problem and Minimum Spanning Trees , 1970, Oper. Res..

[12]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  OPTIMIZATION APPROACH IN HIGHWAY SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND PROGRAMMING , 1982 .

[13]  Antonio Sassano,et al.  A Lagrangian-based heuristic for large-scale set covering problems , 1998, Math. Program..

[14]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2007 .

[15]  Juan Gaytán Iniestra,et al.  Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  Matteo Fischetti,et al.  A Heuristic Method for the Set Covering Problem , 1999, Oper. Res..

[17]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Transportation projects selection process using fuzzy sets theory , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..