Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage.

BACKGROUND During the last 5 years, anchorage control with self-tapping miniscrews has become an important part of the clinical management of orthodontic patients. Yet, no studies have been performed for measuring mechanical properties of the currently available systems. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is the evaluation of mechanical properties of three commercially available self-tapping screw systems used in orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS three systems with a 1.5 mm diameter and 11 mm length screw (Leone, Firenze, Italy; M.A.S. Micerium, Avegno, Italy; Dentos, Korea) were examined. The results compared the resistance to bending, torque, pullout of each screw and the insertion moments needed to screw down each sample. CONCLUSIONS All three miniscrews have mechanical properties that contribute to their safe use as skeletal anchorage in orthodontics. Although stainless steel has demonstrated to be more resistant to failure than titanium, its overall performance as material for miniscrews could be inferior to titanium. In order to facilitate the insertion, the asymmetric profile of the thread should be preferred to the symmetric cut. The ratio between the diameter of the drill and the diameter of the corresponding miniscrew is pivotal for the successful implantation and resistance of the miniscrews. Looking at the mechanical properties evaluated in this study, a cylindric shape of the screw is better than a conic one. The conic shape could be preferred in case the site of insertion is iterradicular and therefore limited to 2.5-3.5 millimetres.

[1]  P. Worthington,et al.  Oral and Maxillofacial Traumatology , 1981 .

[2]  T. Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  The Use of Small Titanium Screws for Orthodontic Anchorage , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[3]  Luhr Hg A micro-system for cranio-maxillofacial skeletal fixation , 1988 .

[4]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[5]  M. Dalstra,et al.  Titanium-alloy enhances bone-pedicle screw fixation: mechanical and histomorphometrical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[6]  R Kanomi,et al.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[7]  M. Block,et al.  A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  Jae-Hyun Sung,et al.  Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. , 2002, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[9]  H. Kyung,et al.  Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. , 2001, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[10]  R. Smith,et al.  Transitional implants for orthodontic anchorage. , 2000, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[11]  W C Hayes,et al.  Compact bone fatigue damage--I. Residual strength and stiffness. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W. Roberts,et al.  Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  Creekmore Td,et al.  The possibility of skeletal anchorage. , 1983 .

[14]  C Bourauel,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of endosseous palatal implants and bones after vertical, horizontal, and diagonal force application. , 2003, European journal of orthodontics.

[15]  B. Rahn,et al.  Comparison of compression and torque measurements of self-tapping and pretapped screws. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  H. Mitani,et al.  Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  H. Wehrbein,et al.  Aspects of the use of endosseous palatal implants in orthodontic therapy. , 1998, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[18]  J. Brettle,et al.  A metallurgical examination of surgical implants which have failed in service. , 1970, Injury.

[19]  Franco Marinozzi,et al.  Microtensile measurements of single trabeculae stiffness in human femur. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  D. Pienkowski,et al.  Multicycle Mechanical Performance of Titanium and Stainless Steel Transpedicular Spine Implants , 1998, Spine.