Public Discourse in the Web Does Not Exhibit Group Polarization

We performed a massive study of the dynamics of group deliberation among several websites containing millions of opinions on topics ranging from books to media. Contrary to the common phenomenon of group polarization observed offline, we measured a strong tendency towards moderate views in the course of time. This phenomenon possibly operates through a self-selection bias whereby previous comments and ratings elicit contrarian views that soften the previous opinions.

[1]  S. Asch.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[2]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[3]  W. Riker,et al.  A Theory of the Calculus of Voting , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  Further comment on the risky shift. , 1974 .

[5]  David G. Myers,et al.  Polarizing effects of social comparison , 1978 .

[6]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[7]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[8]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[9]  Johannes A. Zuber,et al.  Choice shift and group polarization : an analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes , 1992 .

[10]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings , 1998, MIS Q..

[11]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Predicting the future : an introduction to the theory of forecasting , 1998 .

[12]  C. Sunstein.  The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[13]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior , 2000, EC '00.

[14]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Deliberative Trouble - Why Groups Go to Extremes , 2000 .

[15]  Alexander A. Schuessler.  EXPRESSIVE VOTING , 2000 .

[16]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[17]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[19]  John Riedl,et al.  Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Bin Gu,et al.  The Impact of Online Recommendations and Consumer Feedback on Sales , 2004, ICIS.

[21]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  What motivates consumers to review a product online ? A study of the product-specific antecedents of online movie reviews , 2006 .

[22]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[23]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Can online reviews reveal a product's true quality?: empirical findings and analytical modeling of Online word-of-mouth communication , 2006, EC '06.

[24]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Self Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..