Field Shaping for Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy and Multileaf Collimation.

Three-dimensional (3-D) conformal treatments are complex and involve many fields, virtually all of which are irregularly shaped and, in the not too distant future, may be intensity-modulated arbitrarily. The multileaf collimator (MLC) is an essential tool for making the delivery of these treatments practical. The characteristics of MLCs of different manufacturers vary significantly, which has an impact on the resulting dose distributions and their clinical applicability. The jagged edges of the fields shaped with MLCs has raised concern about the dose distributions. To study the dosimetric consequences of the jagged boundary, accurate methods of predicting dose distributions are necessary. Preliminary dosimetric and clinical studies show that, for a vast majority of sites and techniques, the MLC is an appropriate replacement for continuous alloy blocks and that the uneasiness about the MLC-shaped boundaries is unwarranted. To fully realize the efficiency possible with a MLC, it is important that it be integrated into the 3-D conformal treatment planning system. Schemes and criteria for positioning leaves relative to the continuous boundary are being studied and often depend on the treatment site, the surrounding normal critical structures, and the treatment technique. Optimum use of the MLC for the efficient delivery of complex 3-D conformal treatments is possible only when treatments are delivered under computer control. Computer-controlled radiation therapy with the MLC is evolving rapidly. Currently, only boundaries are shaped automatically. It is expected that in the near future intensity-modulated treatments will also become practical. General quality assurance and safety requirements of a treatment machine. In many ways, MLCs are more precise and safer than conventional field-shaping devices. However, it is important that the MLC configuration for each field be verified by a record and verify system to ensure that the correct field shape has been selected for treatment.

[1]  R Mohan,et al.  A model for computer-controlled delivery of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[2]  C B Begg,et al.  The effect of local control on metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the prostate: long-term results in patients treated with 125I implantation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  R Mohan,et al.  Automatic generation of beam apertures. , 1993, Medical physics.

[4]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Clinical experience with a computerized record and verify system. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  A. Boyer,et al.  Dose distributions of x-ray fields as shaped with multileaf collimators. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Battista,et al.  A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV x rays. , 1985, Medical physics.

[7]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[8]  R Mohan,et al.  Perspectives of multidimensional conformal radiation treatment. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  A computerized record and verify system for radiation treatments. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R Mohan,et al.  The biological basis for conformal three-dimensional radiation therapy. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  R. Mohan,et al.  Use of fast Fourier transforms in calculating dose distributions for irregularly shaped fields for three-dimensional treatment planning. , 1987, Medical physics.

[12]  A L Boyer,et al.  Clinical dosimetry for implementation of a multileaf collimator. , 1992, Medical physics.

[13]  P. C. Williams,et al.  The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  T. Losasso,et al.  Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: analysis of geometric accuracy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  A R Smith,et al.  Evaluation of multileaf collimator design for a photon beam. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  S. Spirou,et al.  Dose calculation for photon beams with intensity modulation generated by dynamic jaw or multileaf collimations. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D. Convery,et al.  The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation , 1992 .

[19]  R. Mohan,et al.  Differential pencil beam dose computation model for photons. , 1986, Medical physics.

[20]  James M. Galvin,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR SYSTEM , 1993 .

[21]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  The potential and limitations of the inverse radiotherapy technique , 1995 .

[22]  T LoSasso,et al.  The use of a multi-leaf collimator for conformal radiotherapy of carcinomas of the prostate and nasopharynx. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  S Takahashi,et al.  Conformation radiotherapy. Rotation techniques as applied to radiography and radiotherapy of cancer. , 1965, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.