Half-occlusion processing in stereoscopic vision

................................................................................................................................................ 4 TIIVISTELMÄ............................................................................................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS ................................................................................................. 7

[1]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[3]  Philip A Duke,et al.  Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth , 2003, Vision Research.

[5]  G Westheimer,et al.  Panum’s phenomenon and the confluence of signals from the two eyes in stereoscopy , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  CASPER J ERKELENS,et al.  Capture of Visual Direction: an Unexpected Phenomenon in Binocular Vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  Masanori Idesawa,et al.  Occlusion cues and sustaining cues in 3D illusory object perception with binocular viewing , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Capture of stereopsis and apparent motion by illusory contours , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  L. Werndly.  An Optical Illusion , 1907, Nature.

[11]  B JULESZ,et al.  Binocular Depth Perception without Familiarity Cues , 1964, Science.

[12]  H. Ono,et al.  Ecologically Invalid Monocular Texture Leads to Longer Perceptual Latencies in Random-Dot Stereograms , 1999, Perception.

[13]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Human Stereopsis: A Psychophysical Approach , 1976 .

[14]  P. Bressan,et al.  Occlusion, transparency, and stereopsis: A new explanation for stereo capture , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  B. Rogers,et al.  Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. , 1983, Science.

[16]  S. Grossberg,et al.  A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and three-dimensional surface perception , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  H. Ono,et al.  Visual Directions of Two Stimuli in Panum's Limiting Case , 1994, Perception.

[18]  A. B. Nutt.  Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[19]  Kevin R. Brooks,et al.  Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis , 2006, Vision Research.

[20]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Amodal Completion and the Perception of Depth without Binocular Correspondence , 2002, Perception.

[22]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Interpolation and the detection of fine structure in stereoscopic matching , 1987, Vision Research.

[23]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Border Ownership from Intracortical Interactions in Visual Area V2 , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[25]  K. Wilde.  Der Punktreiheneffekt und die Rolle der binocularen Querdisparation beim Tiefensehen , 1950 .

[26]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular Matching of Dissimilar Features in Phantom Stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Stereoscopic Surface Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[28]  B. Anderson.  A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.

[29]  B Gillam,et al.  The Role of Monocular Regions in Stereoscopic Displays , 1988, Perception.

[30]  Christopher Bowd,et al.  Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays , 1999, Vision Research.

[31]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Illusory contours and stereo depth , 1974 .

[32]  R. Lawson,et al.  Minimum Condition for Stereopsis and Anomalous Contour , 1967, Science.

[33]  Barbara J Gillam,et al.  Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap , 2003, Vision Research.

[34]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  The Pursuit of Leonardo's Constraint , 2002, Perception.

[35]  G. Rønne.  THE PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF SENSORY FUSION * , 1956, Acta ophthalmologica.

[36]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[37]  F. Qiu,et al.  Figure and Ground in the Visual Cortex: V2 Combines Stereoscopic Cues with Gestalt Rules , 2005, Neuron.

[38]  B. Anderson.  Stereovision: beyond disparity computations , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  weiland A. von Szily.  Stereoskopische Versuche mit Schattenrissen , 2005, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Ophthalmologie.

[40]  Michael Cook,et al.  Depth of monocular elements in a binocular scene: the conditions for da Vinci stereopsis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  K. Fernow.  New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[42]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms , 2002, Vision Research.

[43]  A Müller-Lyer-type illusion of egocentric distance with 3D convex and concave objects. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[44]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. , 1994, Psychological review.

[45]  Vieth.  Ueber die Richtung der Augen , 1818 .

[46]  H. V. D. Meer.  Wilde's dot-row phenomenon as a special case of aniseikonia , 1982 .

[47]  K. PRAZDNY.  ‘Capture’ of stereopsis by illusory contours , 1986, Nature.

[48]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Interocularly unpaired zones escape local binocular matching , 1994, Vision Research.

[49]  On the Late Invention of the Stereoscope , 1987, Perception.

[51]  A. Ames,et al.  The Illusion of Depth from Single Pictures , 1925 .

[52]  S Blomfield.  Implicit features and stereoscopy. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[53]  Joh. Müller.  Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes des Menschen und der Thiere : nebst einem Versuch über die Bewegungen der Augen und über den menschlichen Blick , 1826 .

[54]  K Nakayama,et al.  Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. , 1992, Science.

[55]  Lei Liu,et al.  Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence , 1994, Nature.

[56]  M. Banks,et al.  Estimator Reliability and Distance Scaling in Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1999, Perception.

[57]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[58]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional surface perception: Binocular and half-occluded scenic images , 1997, Neural Networks.

[59]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects , 1997, Vision Research.

[60]  Michael J Pianta,et al.  Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception , 2003, Vision Research.

[61]  David Mumford,et al.  A Bayesian treatment of the stereo correspondence problem using half-occluded regions , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[62]  H. Ono,et al.  Occlusion as a depth cue in the Wheatstone-Panum limiting case , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  H. Ono,et al.  Resolving discrepant results of the Wheatstone Experiment , 1985, Psychological research.

[64]  Geoffrey Egnal,et al.  Detecting Binocular Half-Occlusions: Empirical Comparisons of Five Approaches , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[65]  Masanori Idesawa.  Perception of 3-D Illusory Surface with Binocular Viewing , 1991 .

[66]  B. Gillam,et al.  Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect , 1998, Vision Research.

[68]  Martin Kaye,et al.  Stereopsis without binocular correlation , 1978, Vision Research.

[69]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Perspective, Orientation Disparity, and Anisotropy in Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1992, Perception.

[70]  T. Kumar,et al.  Multiple matching of features in simple stereograms , 1996, Vision Research.

[71]  Peter Lennie,et al.  Binocular integration of partially occluded surfaces , 2002, Vision Research.

[72]  George S. Harker,et al.  Some observations and measurements of the Panum phenomenon , 1967 .

[73]  Philip M. Grove,et al.  Slant or occlusion: global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines , 2004, Vision Research.

[74]  N J Wade,et al.  The stereoscopic views of Wheatstone and Brewster , 1985, Psychological research.

[75]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Resolving Border Disputes in Midlevel Vision , 2005, Neuron.

[76]  S P McKee,et al.  The ‘Uniqueness Constraint’ and Binocular Masking , 1995, Perception.

[77]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Illusory Occluding Contours and Surface Formation by Depth Propagation , 1992, Perception.

[78]  Osamu Watanabe,et al.  Stereo algorithm that extracts a depth cue from interocularly unpaired points , 1999, Neural Networks.

[79]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone , 1999, Vision Research.

[80]  J. Pokorny.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[81]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Subjective contours capture stereopsis , 1985, Nature.

[82]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[83]  George Mather,et al.  The role of subjective contours in capture of stereopsis , 1989, Vision Research.

[84]  B Gillam,et al.  Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  W. Gogel,et al.  THE TENDENCY TO SEE OBJECTS AS EQUIDISTANT AND ITS INVERSE RELATION TO LATERAL SEPARATION , 1956 .

[86]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[87]  Michael Cook,et al.  Monocular Discs in the Occlusion Zones of Binocular Surfaces Do Not Have Quantitative Depth—A Comparison with Panum's Limiting Case , 2003, Perception.

[88]  Kenneth N. Ogle,et al.  INDUCED SIZE EFFECT: I. A NEW PHENOMENON IN BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELATIVE SIZES OF THE IMAGES OF THE TWO EYES , 1938 .

[89]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.

[90]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Leonardo's constraint: two opaque objects cannot be seen in the same direction. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[92]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[93]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 1995 .

[94]  S. Freguia.  Researches in Binocular Vision. , 1950 .

[95]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Stereoscopic occlusion junctions , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[96]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Asymmetrical Effect of Crossed and Uncrossed Disparity on Stereoscopic Capture , 1993, Perception.

[97]  Masanori Idesawa,et al.  Volume Perception with Binocular Viewing , 1997 .

[98]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Cortical computation of stereo disparity , 1998, Vision Research.

[99]  B. Gillam,et al.  Panum's Limiting Case: Double Fusion, Convergence Error, or ‘Da Vinci Stereopsis’ , 1995, Perception.

[100]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation , 1987, Vision Research.

[101]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Transparency: Relation to Depth, Subjective Contours, Luminance, and Neon Color Spreading , 1990, Perception.

[102]  H. Takeichi,et al.  Binocular Displacement of Unpaired Region , 1994, Perception.

[103]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[104]  A. Medina Puerta.  The power of shadows: shadow stereopsis. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[105]  I. Gordon,et al.  Occlusion and the Distortion of Alignment in Three-Dimensional Space , 1993, Perception.

[106]  B. Julesz,et al.  A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ILLUSORY CONTOUR FORMATION IN STEREOPSIS , 1995 .

[107]  Wheatstone—Panum limiting case: Occlusion, camouflage, and vergence-induced disparity cues , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[108]  R. Lawson,et al.  Stereoscopic enhancement and erasure of subjective contours. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[109]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Interpolation in stereoscopic matching , 1985, Nature.

[110]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis , 1994, Nature.

[111]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[112]  Masanori Idesawa.  Two types of occlusion cues for the perception of 3-D illusory objects in binocular fusion , 1993 .

[113]  Marja Liinasuo,et al.  Neon colour spreading in three-dimensional illusory objects in humans , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[114]  P. Panum.  Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen , 1858 .

[115]  B L Anderson,et al.  Occlusion junctions do not improve stereoacuity. , 2001, Spatial vision.