Determining subsidised forest stands to satisfy required annual wood yield with minimum governmental expense

There are regions where forestry is required for wood production but the profitability is so low that many forest stands cannot be managed without subsidisation. Hence, the policymakers should design an efficient subsidising system involving the selection of subsidised forest stands. In this paper, we present an analytical framework for the proposition through the construction of a normal forest (a forest state such that the age distribution of stands is uniform) that consists of only stands that need to be subsidised for regeneration. The normal forest is constructed so that it supplies the required annual wood yield with minimum governmental expense for the subsidy. The rotation age of the normal forest is set to an optimal rotation age based on the soil expectation value of the stands under the minimum subsidy rates. The normal forest can be derived without numerical integration when the dominant tree height distribution follows a generalised gamma distribution. We present an application of the framework for four tree species in the Nagano Prefecture, Japan. The result of the application shows that the framework enables us to select the subsidised stands for efficient governmental funding, implying the practical conditions of the stands and requirements of wood demands, by using optimisation functions in a commercial spreadsheet program.

[1]  T. Heaps Convergence of Optimal Harvesting Policies to a Normal Forest , 2015 .

[2]  Wang Qing-li,et al.  Study on height growth model ofPinus koraiensis , 2008, Journal of Forestry Research.

[3]  S. Tatsuhara,et al.  Examination of Maximum Sustainable Timber Yield Based on a Profitability Simulation , 2012 .

[4]  Satoshi Ito,et al.  Predicting the site index of sugi plantations from GIS-derived environmental factors in Miyazaki Prefecture , 2007, Journal of Forest Research.

[5]  T. Heaps The forestry maximum principle , 1984 .

[6]  Tapan Mitra,et al.  Some Theoretical Results on the Economics of Forestry , 1985 .

[7]  Genetic variation in height growth curves observed in three clonal tests of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) in Kyushu , 2000, Journal of Forest Research.

[8]  K. Yoda,et al.  Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .

[9]  E. Gustafson,et al.  Linking linear programming and spatial simulation models to predict landscape effects of forest management alternatives. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Khodabina Morteza,et al.  SOME PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED GAMMA DISTRIBUTION , 2010 .

[11]  D. Hann,et al.  Optimum stand prescriptions for ponderosa pine , 1983 .

[12]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups , 2005 .

[13]  Hong S. He,et al.  Modeling forest harvesting effects on landscape pattern in the Northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens , 2006 .

[14]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Defining the forest landowner’s utility–loss compensative subsidy level for a biodiversity object , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[15]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Optimising the management of Pinus nigra Arn. stands under endogenous risk of fire in Catalonia , 2008 .

[16]  A. Yoshimoto,et al.  Evaluation of carbon sequestration and thinning regimes within the optimization framework for forest stand management , 2007, European Journal of Forest Research.

[17]  C. V. Kooten,et al.  Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services , 1995 .

[18]  V. Kapos,et al.  Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Global Land-Use Implications , 2008, Science.

[19]  L. Valsta,et al.  A comparison of numerical methods for optimizing even aged stand management , 1990 .

[20]  Kai Moriguchi,et al.  A Simple Method to Calculate the Upper Limits on Silviculture Cost , 2015 .

[21]  K. Macdicken,et al.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: how are the world's forests changing? , 2015 .

[22]  Tapan Mitra,et al.  On the faustmann solution to the forest management problem , 1986 .

[23]  P. Bettinger,et al.  Spatial Forest Harvest Scheduling for Areas Involving Carbon and Timber Management Goals , 2015 .

[24]  Teruhiko Marutani The effect of site quality on economically optimal stand management , 2010 .

[25]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Community forest management and REDD , 2015 .

[26]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands , 2008 .

[27]  H. Burkhart Comparison of maximum size–density relationships based on alternate stand attributes for predicting tree numbers and stand growth , 2013 .

[28]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of subsidy schemes for industrial timber development and carbon sequestration in Japanese forest plantations , 2011, Journal of Forestry Research.

[29]  L. Bertalanffy Quantitative Laws in Metabolism and Growth , 1957 .

[30]  M. E. Dale,et al.  A Gis-derived integrated moisture index to predict forest composition and productivity of Ohio forests (U.S.A.) , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  E. Stacy A Generalization of the Gamma Distribution , 1962 .

[32]  Roger A. Sedjo,et al.  An Optimal Control Theory Model to Estimate the Regional Long-Term Supply of Timber , 1983 .

[33]  P. Samuelson Economics of Forestry in an Evolving Society , 1976 .

[34]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lessons from Joint Forest Management in Zambia , 2014 .