On the effectiveness of private transnational governance regimes - evaluating corporate sustainability reporting according to the Global Reporting Initiative

The increasing involvement of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in global governance has been both applauded for its potential to make governance more effective and criticized for lacking democratic legitimization. Hence we investigate the effectiveness of one transnational governance regime, corporate sustainability reporting according to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). We found that the GRI has been successful in terms of output effectiveness by promoting the dissemination of sustainability reporting, in particular among Asian and South American companies. However, the outcome effectiveness of the GRI is limited as reporting showed a rather uniform content across countries and sectors which does not reflect materiality considerations. As GRI reporting does not seem to have facilitated greater company–stakeholder interaction, its impact effectiveness is likely to be limited too.

[1]  Estrella Peinado-Vara,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America , 2006 .

[2]  David L. Levy,et al.  The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance , 2010 .

[3]  Petra Christmann,et al.  Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation , 2006 .

[4]  Sarah Burton.  Making the Business Case for Sustainability , 2014 .

[5]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute? , 2010 .

[6]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[7]  J. Ruggie.  Reconstituting the Global Public Domain — Issues, Actors, and Practices , 2004 .

[8]  Chenting Su,et al.  A review of research methodologies in international business , 2006 .

[9]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate social and environmental reporting , 1995 .

[10]  B. Leca,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly , 2009 .

[11]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Operationalizing the Concept of Business-Level Strategy in Research , 1980 .

[12]  Francis Fukuyama,et al.  State-building : governance and world order in the twenty-first century , 2005 .

[13]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[14]  A. Kolk,et al.  Harmonization in CSR Reporting , 2011 .

[15]  Stephen D. Krasner.  Sovereignty , 1988 .

[16]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[17]  A. Scherer,et al.  The Business Firm as a Political Actor , 2009 .

[18]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[19]  Rasoul H. Tondkar,et al.  Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective , 2005 .

[20]  P. Thompson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Malaysia , 2004 .

[21]  Nanny Wermuth,et al.  Response models for mixed binary and quantitative variables , 1992 .

[22]  Deanna Kemp,et al.  Corporate social responsibility, mining and “audit culture” , 2012 .

[23]  I. Ioannou,et al.  London Business School , 2011 .

[24]  Guy L. F. Holburn,et al.  Nonmarket Strategy Performance: Evidence from U.S. Electric Utilities , 2006 .

[25]  Kathryn M. Gordon,et al.  Corporate Responsibility Practices of Emerging Market Companies , 2005 .

[26]  W. Chapple,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia , 2005 .

[27]  S. Kobrin.  Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy , 1998 .

[28]  P. Bansal,et al.  Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms , 2006 .

[29]  Jedrzej George Frynas,et al.  Editorial Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world , 2005 .

[30]  L. Zucker.  Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[31]  R. Tulder.  Toward a Renewed Stages Theory for BRIC Multinational Enterprises? A Home Country Bargaining Approach , 2010 .

[32]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Green Clubs: Collective Action and Voluntary Environmental Programs , 2012 .

[33]  C. Mercer.  NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review of the literature , 2002 .

[34]  A. Crane,et al.  Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization , 2005 .

[35]  R. Ivey.  EVOLVING SUSTAINABLY : A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF CORPORATE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2005 .

[36]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[37]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization , 2011 .

[38]  James R. Crotty,et al.  Structural causes of the global financial crisis: a critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture’ , 2009 .

[39]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[40]  J. M. Moneva,et al.  GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability , 2006 .

[41]  Gabriel Eweje.  The Role of MNEs in Community Development Initiatives in Developing Countries , 2006 .

[42]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  The challenges of innovating for sustainable development , 2003 .

[43]  T. Kochan,et al.  Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike's suppliers , 2007 .

[44]  M. Halme,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Developing Countries , 2009 .

[45]  H. V. Buren,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Large Mexican Firms , 2006 .

[46]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[47]  David Vogel,et al.  The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct , 2006 .

[48]  James N. Rosenau,et al.  Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics , 1992 .

[49]  David Held,et al.  Globalization and the Liberal Democratic State , 1993, Government and Opposition.

[50]  Luis Fernando González Escobar,et al.  Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[51]  Hildy Teegen,et al.  The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda , 2004 .

[52]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Nonmarket Strategy and Social Responsibility , 2007 .

[53]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[54]  F. Wolff,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe , 2009 .

[55]  Minna Halme,et al.  The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting , 1997 .

[56]  A. Hicks,et al.  Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture , 2000 .

[57]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Global Private Regimes, Domestic Public Law , 2014 .

[58]  C. Villiers,et al.  Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa , 2006 .

[59]  D. Cormier,et al.  Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits , 1999 .

[60]  A. C. Cutler.  Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: a crisis of legitimacy , 2001, Review of International Studies.

[61]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans , 1994 .

[62]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Corporate-Level Strategy, Business-Level Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1981 .

[63]  W. Scott.  Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests , 2007 .

[64]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[65]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[66]  K. Rehbein,et al.  Playing on Two Chessboards: Reputation Effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA) , 2014 .

[67]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .

[68]  M. Epstein,et al.  Making the Business Case for Sustainability , 2003 .

[69]  S. Kobrin.  Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights , 2009, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[70]  D. Egan,et al.  Corporate Political Action in the Global Polity , 2000 .

[71]  Jeremy Baskin,et al.  Corporate Responsibility in Emerging Markets , 2006 .

[72]  M. Toffel,et al.  Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .

[73]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions , 2005 .

[74]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[75]  D. Chandler.  New Rights for Old? Cosmopolitan Citizenship and the Critique of State Sovereignty , 2003 .

[76]  R. Barkemeyer,et al.  CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: is Russia a different shape of BRIC? , 2011 .

[77]  A. Sorge,et al.  Embedding Organizations. Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context , 2000 .

[78]  David A. Smith,et al.  The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy , 1998 .

[79]  Hussein A. Warsame,et al.  Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports , 1998 .

[80]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[81]  O. Young.  Evaluating the success of international environmental regimes: where are we now? , 2002 .

[82]  P. Haas.  Addressing the Global Governance Deficit , 2004, Global Environmental Politics.

[83]  S. Withers,et al.  Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Which to Choose? , 2014 .

[84]  James Guthrie,et al.  Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis , 1990 .

[85]  T. Fox,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Development: In quest of an agenda , 2004 .

[86]  A. Kolk,et al.  Determinants of the Adoption of Sustainability Assurance Statements: An International Investigation , 2008 .

[87]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[88]  A. Richardson,et al.  Symbolic and Substantive Legitimation in Professional Practice , 1985 .

[89]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[90]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector , 2001 .

[91]  A. Carroll,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice , 2010 .

[92]  N. Sivakumar.  The Business Ethics of Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata – A Forerunner in Promoting Stakeholder Welfare , 2008 .

[93]  David P. Baron,et al.  Integrated Strategy, Trade Policy, and Global Competition , 1997 .

[94]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[95]  L. King.  Central European Capitalism in Comparative Perspective , 2007 .

[96]  Debora L. Spar,et al.  The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business , 2003 .

[97]  Dara O'Rourke,et al.  Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring , 2003 .

[98]  Donald W. Schaffner,et al.  Comparison of Logistic Regression and Linear Regression in Modeling Percentage Data , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[99]  Oliver F. Williams.  The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[100]  J. Boddewyn,et al.  International-Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions , 1994 .

[101]  Philippe Gugler,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness? , 2009 .

[102]  F. Biermann,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of intergovernmental organisations in international environmental politics , 2004 .

[103]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[104]  K. Yeoh.  The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy , 2012 .

[105]  Richard Welford,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North American and Asia: 2004 Survey Results , 2005 .

[106]  A. Scherer,et al.  Democratizing Corporate Governance , 2011 .

[107]  A. Kolk.  Trajectories of Sustainability Reporting by MNCs , 2009 .

[108]  Frances Bowen,et al.  Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? , 2000 .

[109]  S. Banerjee.  Corporate environmental strategies and actions , 2001 .

[110]  M. S. Fifka,et al.  Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis , 2013 .

[111]  B. D. Baysinger,et al.  Domain Maintenance as an Objective of Business Political Activity: An Expanded Typology , 1984 .

[112]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[113]  Anthony Mcgrew,et al.  The End of the Old Order ? Globalization and the Prospects for World Order , 1998, Review of International Studies.

[114]  A. Kolk.  Environmental Reporting by Multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or Divergence , 2005 .

[115]  Arild Underdal,et al.  Regime consequences : methodological challenges and research strategies , 2004 .

[116]  W. Visser.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries , 2008 .

[117]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure Under Threat of Audit , 2006 .

[118]  T. Lawton,et al.  Corporate Political Activity: A Literature Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[119]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .