The role of empathy in choosing rewards from another's perspective

As social animals, we regularly act in the interest of others by making decisions on their behalf. These decisions can take the form of choices between smaller short-term rewards and larger long-term rewards, and can be effectively indexed by temporal discounting (TD). In a TD paradigm, a reward loses subjective value with increasing delay presumably because it becomes more difficult to simulate how much the recipient (e.g., future self) will value it. If this is the case, then the value of delayed rewards should be discounted even more steeply when we are choosing for someone whose feelings we do not readily simulate, such as socially distant strangers. Second, the ability to simulate shows individual differences and is indexed by trait empathy. We hypothesized that individuals high in trait empathy will more readily simulate, and hence discount less steeply for distant others, compared to those who are low on trait empathy. To test these predictions, we asked 63 participants from the general population to perform a TD task from the perspectives of close and distant others, as well as their own. People were found to discount less steeply for themselves, and the steepness of TD increased with increasing distance from self. Additionally, individuals who scored high in trait empathy were found to discount less steeply for distant others compared to those who scored low. These findings confirm the role of empathy in determining how we choose rewards for others.

[1]  T. van Amelsvoort,et al.  Neural correlates of reward in autism , 2008, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[2]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward , 2009, Science.

[3]  Xiaoying Wang,et al.  Do You Feel My Pain? Racial Group Membership Modulates Empathic Neural Responses , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Noah A. Shamosh,et al.  Individual Differences in Delay Discounting , 2008, Psychological science.

[5]  R. Gordon,et al.  The Simulation Theory: Objections and Misconceptions , 1992 .

[6]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Gregory J. Madden,et al.  Delay Discounting and Performance on the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game , 2002 .

[8]  A. Goldman,et al.  Simulation theory. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[9]  J. Beck,et al.  Is the delay discounting paradigm useful in understanding social anxiety? , 2007, Behaviour research and therapy.

[10]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Empathic choice involves vmPFC value signals that are modulated by social processing implemented in IPL. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[11]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  Maturation of limbic corticostriatal activation and connectivity associated with developmental changes in temporal discounting , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Warren K Bickel,et al.  Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  A. Odum,et al.  Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[15]  R. Tunney,et al.  Decisions for Others Become Less Impulsive the Further Away They Are on the Family Tree , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Yuval Rottenstreich,et al.  Affect, Empathy, and Regressive Mispredictions of Others’ Preferences Under Risk , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Jerzy Osiński,et al.  Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism and social discounting , 2009 .

[18]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Social Discounting , 2006, Psychological science.

[19]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Reward processing in autism , 2010, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[20]  M. McCloskey,et al.  IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults , 2007 .

[21]  A. Damasio,et al.  Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. , 1991 .

[22]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[23]  Y. Trope,et al.  Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others' Actions. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[24]  Michael Forsting,et al.  The impact of alcohol dependence on social brain function , 2013, Addiction biology.

[25]  K. Kirby,et al.  Impatience and grades: Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA , 2002 .

[26]  Don Ross,et al.  Social Discounting and Externalizing Behavior Problems in Boys , 2012 .

[27]  C. Keysers,et al.  Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Julie M. Hupp,et al.  Risk Taking in Relationships: Differences in Deciding for Oneself Versus for a Friend , 2003 .

[29]  W. Mischel,et al.  Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[30]  C. Moore,et al.  Empathy and Social Perspective Taking in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2009, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[31]  J. Maner,et al.  Compensatory deficits following rejection: the role of social anxiety in disrupting affiliative behavior , 2009, Depression and anxiety.

[32]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Empathizing with basic emotions: Common and discrete neural substrates , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[33]  G. Loewenstein Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[34]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  An Agent Independent Axis for Executed and Modeled Choice in Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[36]  Warren K Bickel,et al.  Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner's dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes , 2005, Learning & behavior.

[37]  Mark T. Waters,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Thislicensedoesnot permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without sp , 2009 .

[38]  J. Heckman,et al.  A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions , 2012, Neuron.

[40]  G. Dichter,et al.  Reward circuitry function in autism spectrum disorders. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[41]  S. M. Alessi,et al.  Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[42]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[43]  L. Green,et al.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  W. Mischel,et al.  Delay of gratification in children. , 1989, Science.

[45]  Jean Decety,et al.  Love hurts: An fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.