Conditioning and preconditioning of the variational data assimilation problem

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) centres use numerical models of the atmospheric flow to forecast future weather states from an estimate of the current state. Variational data assimilation (VAR) is used commonly to determine an optimal state estimate that miminizes the errors between observations of the dynamical system and model predictions of the flow. The rate of convergence of the VAR scheme and the sensitivity of the solution to errors in the data are dependent on the condition number of the Hessian of the variational least-squares objective function. The traditional formulation of VAR is ill-conditioned and hence leads to slow convergence and an inaccurate solution. In practice, operational NWP centres precondition the system via a control variable transform to reduce the condition number of the Hessian. In this paper we investigate the conditioning of VAR for a single, periodic, spatially-distributed state variable. We present theoretical bounds on the condition number of the original and preconditioned Hessians and hence demonstrate the improvement produced by the preconditioning. We also investigate theoretically the effect of observation position and error variance on the preconditioned system and show that the problem becomes more ill-conditioned with increasingly dense and accurate observations. Finally, we confirm the theoretical results in an operational setting by giving experimental results from the Met Office variational system.

[1]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Toeplitz And Circulant Matrices , 1977 .

[2]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[3]  Stéphane Laroche,et al.  Implementation of a 3D variational data assimilation system at the Canadian Meteorological Centre. Part I: The global analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review , 2005, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Rosemary Munro,et al.  Diagnosis of background errors for radiances and other observable quantities in a variational data assimilation scheme, and the explanation of a case of poor convergence , 2000 .

[6]  Andrew C. Lorenc,et al.  Development of an Operational Variational Assimilation Scheme (gtSpecial IssueltData Assimilation in Meteology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice) , 1997 .

[7]  A. Simmons,et al.  The ECMWF operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics , 2007 .

[8]  N. Nichols,et al.  Conditioning of the 3DVAR Data Assimilation Problem , 2009 .

[9]  Nancy Nichols,et al.  An investigation of incremental 4D‐Var using non‐tangent linear models , 2005 .

[10]  A. Lorenc Optimal nonlinear objective analysis , 1988 .

[11]  Y. Trémolet Incremental 4D-Var convergence study , 2007 .

[12]  N. B. Ingleby,et al.  The Met. Office global three‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2000 .

[13]  A. Lorenc,et al.  The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2007 .

[14]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .