What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques

It is important to articulate the objectives and underlying assumptions behind a growing body of experimental research in conceptual modeling. We provide four guidelines for developing materials for experiments that evaluate conceptual modeling techniques, under the assumption that a primary purpose of conceptual modeling is to facilitate communication between analysts and users in validating domain knowledge during systems development. These guidelines assist in developing experimental materials that support meaningful tests of domain semantics. We present empirical evidence indicating the value of two of the guidelines. We also evaluate selected recent experiments on conceptual modeling with respect to the guidelines.

[1]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Designing Research for Application , 1981 .

[3]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  Effects of Local Versus Global Schema Diagrams on Verification and Communication in Conceptual Data Modeling , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  The Concept of External Validity , 1982 .

[5]  J. Lynch The Role of External Validity in Theoretical Research , 1983 .

[6]  J. Lynch On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research , 1982 .

[7]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[9]  Peter Meso,et al.  How Good Are These UML Diagrams? An Empirical Test of the Wand and Weber Good Decomposition Model , 2002, ICIS.

[10]  Yair Wand,et al.  Property-Based Semantic Reconciliation of Heterogeneous Information Sources , 2002, ER.

[11]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Activity Modeling and Behavior Modeling , 1986, Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice.

[12]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction , 2000 .

[13]  Ron Weber,et al.  Are Attributes Entities? A Study of Database Designers' Memory Structures , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[16]  Ron Weber,et al.  Properties do not have Properties: Investigating a Questionable Conceptual Modelling Practice , 2003 .

[17]  Ron Weber,et al.  Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.

[18]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[19]  M. Bunge Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[20]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Beyond External Validity , 1983 .

[21]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Property Precedence in Conceptual Modelling , 2004, APCCM.

[22]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation , 2010, Springer US.

[23]  Janice Singer,et al.  Ethical Issues in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..