The Taste of Typeface

Previous research has demonstrated that typefaces can convey meaning over-and-above the actual semantic content of whatever happens to be written. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that people match basic taste words (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter) to typefaces varying in their roundness versus angularity. In Experiment 1, the participants matched rounder typefaces with the word “sweet,” while matching more angular typefaces with the taste words “bitter,” “salty,” and “sour.” Experiment 2 demonstrates that rounder typefaces are liked more and are judged easier to read than their more angular counterparts. We conclude that there is a strong relationship between roundness/angularity, ease of processing, and typeface liking, which in turn influences the correspondence between typeface and taste. These results are discussed in terms of the notion of affective crossmodal correspondences.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  David M Erceg-Hurn,et al.  Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[4]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory , 2002 .

[5]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Music–color associations are mediated by emotion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Hedonics in Taste-Shape Correspondences. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[7]  C. Spence,et al.  On the shapes of flavours: A review of four hypotheses , 2014 .

[8]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[9]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Steve J. Westerman,et al.  Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design Elements , 2012 .

[11]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[12]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Visualising Fragrances through Colours: The Mediating Role of Emotions , 2004, Perception.

[13]  John R. Doyle,et al.  Dressed for the Occasion: Font-Product Congruity in the Perception of Logotype , 2006 .

[14]  D. Westerman,et al.  The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Doyle,et al.  Mixed Messages in Brand Names: Separating the Impacts of Letter Shape from Sound Symbolism , 2011 .

[16]  Jasper J. F. van den Bosch,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[18]  L. Marks,et al.  Synesthesia, at and near its borders , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  I. Child,et al.  Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities , 1978 .

[22]  Geoffrey L. Collier,et al.  Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli , 1996 .

[23]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste preferences and food intake. , 1997, Annual review of nutrition.

[24]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[25]  Franck Celhay,et al.  Food packages and communication through typeface design: The exoticism of exotypes , 2015 .

[26]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[27]  C. Spence,et al.  Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape , 2015 .

[28]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Typeface Connotations , 1964 .

[29]  J. Doyle,et al.  The massage in the medium: Transfer of connotative meaning from typeface to names and products , 2009 .

[30]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  John E. Gump.  The Readability of Typefaces and the Subsequent Mood or Emotion Created in the Reader , 2001 .

[32]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[33]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds , 2014 .

[34]  J. Doyle,et al.  Font appropriateness and brand choice , 2004 .

[35]  C. Spence.  Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism , 2012 .

[36]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments , 2012 .

[37]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Communicability of the emotional connotation of type , 1986 .