Feature selection for fMRI-based deception detection

BackgroundFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a technology used to detect brain activity. Patterns of brain activation have been utilized as biomarkers for various neuropsychiatric applications. Detecting deception based on the pattern of brain activation characterized with fMRI is getting attention – with machine learning algorithms being applied to this field in recent years. The high dimensionality of fMRI data makes it a difficult task to directly utilize the original data as input for classification algorithms in detecting deception. In this paper, we investigated the procedures of feature selection to enhance fMRI-based deception detection.ResultsWe used the t-statistic map derived from the statistical parametric mapping analysis of fMRI signals to construct features that reflect brain activation patterns. We subsequently investigated various feature selection methods including an ensemble method to identify discriminative features to detect deception. Using 124 features selected from a set of 65,166 original features as inputs for a support vector machine classifier, our results indicate that feature selection significantly enhanced the classification accuracy of the support vector machine in comparison to the models trained using all features and dimension reduction based models. Furthermore, the selected features are shown to form anatomic clusters within brain regions, which supports the hypothesis that specific brain regions may play a role during deception processes.ConclusionFeature selection not only enhances classification accuracy in fMRI-based deception detection but also provides support for the biological hypothesis that brain activities in certain regions of the brain are important for discrimination of deception.

[1]  Yiming Yang,et al.  RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[3]  Holger Frohlich,et al.  Feature Selection for Support Vector Machines by Means of Genetic Algorithms -Diploma Thesis in Computer Science- , 2002 .

[4]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  L. Shah,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Seminars in roentgenology.

[6]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF , 1994, ECML.

[7]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[8]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Danh V. Nguyen,et al.  Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data , 2002, Bioinform..

[10]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[11]  Xinghua Lu,et al.  Functional MRI Detection of Deception After Committing a Mock Sabotage Crime * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Olivier Chapelle,et al.  Model Selection for Support Vector Machines , 1999, NIPS.

[13]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  V. Vapnik,et al.  Bounds on Error Expectation for Support Vector Machines , 2000, Neural Computation.

[15]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[16]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[17]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.

[18]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[19]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[20]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Feature selection for support vector machines by means of genetic algorithm , 2003, Proceedings. 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[21]  R. Gur,et al.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[22]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[23]  David Haussler,et al.  Probabilistic kernel regression models , 1999, AISTATS.

[24]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Kimberly S. Mapes,et al.  Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception. , 2009, The open forensic science journal.

[27]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[28]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. , 2004, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[29]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data , 2000, Bioinform..