Abstract Justification for research The construction companies are facing barriers and challenges in BIM adoption as there is no clear guidance or best practice studies from which they can learn and build up their capacity for BIM use in order to increase productivity, efficiency, quality, and to attain competitive advantages in the global market and to achieve the targets in environmental sustainability. Purpose This paper aims to explain a comprehensive and systemic evaluation and assessment of the relevant BIM technologies as part of the BIM adoption and implementation to demonstrate how efficiency gains have been achieved towards a lean architectural practice. Design/methodology/approach The research is undertaken through a KTP (Knowledge Transfer Partnership) project between the University of Salford and the John McCall Architects based in Liverpool, which is an SME (Small Medium Enterprise). The overall aim of KTP is to develop a lean design practice through the BIM adoption and implementation. The overall BIM implementation approach uses a socio-technical view in which it does not only consider the implementation of technology but also considers the socio-cultural environment that provides the context for its implementation. The technology adoption methodology within the BIM implementation approach is the action research oriented qualitative and quantitative research for discovery, comparison, and experimentation as the KTP project with JMA provides an environment for “learning by doing”. Findings Research has proved that BIM technology adoption should be undertaken with a bottom-up approach rather than top-down approach for successful change management and dealing with the resistance to change. As a result of the BIM technology adoption, efficiency gains are achieved through the piloting projects and the design process is improved through the elimination of wastes and value generation. Originality/value Successful BIM adoption needs an implementation strategy. However, at operational level, it is imperative that professional guidelines are required as part of the implementation strategy. This paper introduces a systematic approach for BIM technology adoption based on a case study implementation and it demonstrates a guideline at the operational level for other architectural companies of architectural practices.
[1]
Art Smalley,et al.
Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System
,
2008
.
[2]
Sp Coates,et al.
BIM implementation for an architectural practice
,
2009
.
[3]
R. O'Brien.
An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research
,
2008
.
[4]
Yusuf Arayici,et al.
The key performance indicators of the BIM implementation process
,
2010
.
[5]
John E. Glass,et al.
Review: David Coghlan & Teresa Brannick (2001). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization
,
2002
.
[6]
Y. Arayici,et al.
Digital Construction through BIM Systems will Drive the Re-engineering of Construction Business Practices
,
2008,
2008 International Conference Visualisation.
[7]
Charles M. Eastman,et al.
BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors
,
2008
.
[8]
D. Coghlan,et al.
Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization
,
2000
.
[9]
Robert L. Dilworth,et al.
Action Learning : History and Evolution
,
2010
.
[10]
Yusuf Arayici,et al.
Towards implementation of building information modelling in the construction industry
,
2009
.
[11]
Scott Gallagher,et al.
The Toyota Way
,
2005,
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[12]
Dana K. Smith,et al.
Building Information Modeling: A Strategic Implementation Guide for Architects, Engineers, Constructors, and Real Estate Asset Managers
,
2009
.