Who Ratifies Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties

International environmental accords have become important mechanisms by which nations make promises to administer natural resources and manage the global environment. Previous studies, relying mainly on single cases or small-n data sets, have shed light on the proximate political causes of participation in these agreements. However, no study has yet systematically explained the deeper social determinants of why nations sign, ignore or resist environmental treaties. We offer a theoretically-sequenced model that exploits complementarities between rational choice institutionalism and world-systems theory. Key variables posited by realists and constructivists are also examined, using a new environmental treaty participation index based on ratifications of 22 major environmental agreements by 192 nations. Cross-sectional OLS regression and path analysis strongly supports the institutionalist claim that credibilitythe willingness and ability to honor one's international environmental commit-mentsmatters. But these measures also lend considerable support to the world-systems hypothesis that state credibility is strongly influenced by a legacy of colonial incorporation into the world economy. Narrow export baseour proxy for disadvantaged position in the world-economydirectly and indirectly (through institutions and civil society strength) explains nearly six-tenths of national propensity to sign environmental treaties. A nation's natural capital, its ecological vulnerability, and international environmental NGO memberships had no explanatory power in the path analysis. Our results indicate that new theoretical, methodological and policy approaches are needed to address structural barriers to international cooperation.

[1]  A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes , 2002 .

[2]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development , 2002 .

[3]  Colin Elman,et al.  Progress in international relations theory : appraising the field , 2003 .

[4]  Kenneth A. Oye.  Cooperation under Anarchy , 1986 .

[5]  W. Form,et al.  Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. , 1996 .

[6]  B. Heredia.  The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States Terry Lynn Karl Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997, pp. xviii, 342 , 1998, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[7]  Peter F. Cowhey.  Domestic institutions and the credibility of international commitment: Japan and the United States , 1993, International Organization.

[8]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Embodied pollution in trade: estimating the ‘environmental load displacement’ of industrialised countries , 2002 .

[9]  R. Keohane.  International relations and international law: two optics 1996 , 2003 .

[10]  Elizabeth R. DeSombre,et al.  Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists, and U.S. Power , 2000 .

[11]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Embodied Pollution in Trade: Estimating the 'Environmental Load Displacement' of Industrialised Countries , 2001 .

[12]  M. Zürn.  The Rise of International Environmental Politics: A Review of Current Research , 1998, World Politics.

[13]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Dependency and Rebellion: A Cross-National Analysis , 1990 .

[14]  P. Katzenstein,et al.  Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe , 1985 .

[15]  R. Auty.  Resource Abundance and Economic Development , 1998 .

[16]  M. Brecher,et al.  Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies , 2002 .

[17]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Capitalist World-Economy , 1979 .

[18]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Reciprocity in international relations , 1986, International Organization.

[19]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Environmentalism among nation-states , 1992 .

[20]  G. Gereffi,et al.  Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism , 1994 .

[21]  J. Roberts.  Global Inequality and Climate Change , 2001 .

[22]  J. Roberts,et al.  Globalization, Vulnerability to Climate Change, and Perceived Injustice , 2006 .

[23]  Detlef F. Sprinz,et al.  The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy , 1994, International Organization.

[24]  T. Scovazzi,et al.  Participation in world treaties on the protection of the environment : a collection of data , 1996 .

[25]  Edith Brown Weiss,et al.  Engaging countries : strengthening compliance with international environmental accords , 1998 .

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Jens Weidmann,et al.  Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth , 1999 .

[28]  Oran R. Young,et al.  International Governance , 1994 .

[29]  J. Hayward.  Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe , 1986 .

[30]  A. Moravcsik.  Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical , 2003 .

[31]  F. Braudel,et al.  Civilization And Capitalism, 15Th-18Th Century , 1981 .

[32]  D. Sprinz.  Environment meets statistics : Quantitative analysis of international environmental policy , 2004 .

[33]  B. Yarbrough,et al.  International institutions and the new economics of organization , 1990, International Organization.

[34]  W. Goldfrank,et al.  Ecology and the World-System , 1999 .

[35]  Steven P. Recchia.  Explaining the International Environmental Cooperation of Democratic Countries , 2001 .

[36]  R. Vernon.  Behind the scenes: How Policymaking in the European Community, Japan, and the United States Affects Global Negotiations , 1993 .

[37]  R. Gilpin,et al.  The Political Economy of International Relations , 1987 .

[38]  David John Frank.  The Social Bases of Environmental Treaty Ratification, 1900–1990 , 1999 .

[39]  Joan Sokolovsky,et al.  An Introduction to the World-System Perspective. , 1990 .

[40]  T. McKeown.  Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[41]  D. Snidal.  Rational Choice and International Relations , 2002 .

[42]  M. Grieco,et al.  Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism , 1988, International Organization.

[43]  J. Fearon.  Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[44]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analysing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism , 2001 .

[45]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis , 2002 .

[46]  C. L. Harper.  Environment and Society: Human Perspectives on Environmental Issues , 1995 .

[47]  Ronald B. Davies,et al.  Cooperation in environmental policy: a spatial approach , 2003 .

[48]  J. Allison.  The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice . Edited by David G. Victor, Kal Raustiala, and Eugene B. Skolnikoff. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. 737p. $27.50. , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[49]  James A. Robinson,et al.  The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation , 2000 .

[50]  David A. Lake.  Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[51]  J. Finger,et al.  A Measure of `Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses , 1979 .

[52]  T. Schelling.  What Makes Greenhouse Sense? Time to Rethink the Kyoto Protocol , 2002 .

[53]  I. Wallerstein.  Three paths of national development in sixteenth-century europe , 1972 .

[54]  K. Harold,et al.  Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords: Preliminary Observations from a Collaborative Project , 1995 .

[55]  Christopher Chase-Dunn,et al.  GLOBALIZATION: A WORLD-SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE , 1999 .

[56]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  The demand for international regimes , 1982, International Organization.

[57]  Jan Otto Andersson,et al.  Ecologically unsustainable trade , 2001 .

[58]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements , 2002, International Organization.

[59]  K. Gaubatz.  Democratic states and commitment in international relations , 1996, International Organization.

[60]  C. Kay.  Relevance of structuralist and dependency theories in the neoliberal period : a Latin American perspective , 2000 .

[61]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  SouthNorth Materials Flow: History and Environmental Repercussions , 2001 .

[62]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. , 1996 .

[63]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Dependency and development in Latin America , 1979 .

[64]  J. Paavola.  Institutions for Environmental AID: Pitfalls and Promise , 1997 .

[65]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Hard and Soft Law in International Governance , 2000, International Organization.

[66]  D. Rodrik.  Trading in Illusions , 2001 .

[67]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’ perspective , 2001 .

[68]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions , 1985, World Politics.

[69]  R. Mitchell.  A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes , 2002, Global Environmental Politics.

[70]  Daniel H. Nexon,et al.  Historical sociology of international relations , 2003 .

[71]  T. C. Edens,et al.  Economic Growth , 1957, The Journal of Economic History.

[72]  M. Paterson.  International governance: protecting the environment in a stateless society , 1995 .

[73]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  After Hegemony , 2005 .

[74]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[75]  Roger D. Congleton.  Agency problems and the allocation of international environmental grants: the return to Rio , 2002 .

[76]  F. Halliday.  International relations and its discontents , 1995 .

[77]  Matthew Paterson,et al.  Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation, Resistance , 2000 .

[78]  John Gerard Ruggie,et al.  International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. , 1989 .

[79]  M. Tierney.  Principles and Principals ? The Possibilities for Theoretical Synthesis and Scientific Progress in the Study of International Organizations , 2005 .

[80]  R. Prescott-Allen.  The Wellbeing of Nations: A Country-by-Country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment , 2001 .

[81]  J. Roberts,et al.  From modernization to globalization : perspectives on development and social change , 2000 .

[82]  Daniel W. Drezner.  The sanctions paradox : economic statecraft and international relations , 1999 .

[83]  Carol A. Singer.  Human Development Report 1998 , 2000 .

[84]  B. Stallings.  CHAPTER 3. The Role of Foreign Capital in Economic Development , 1990 .

[85]  A. Frank,et al.  Latin America: Underdevelopment Or Revolution , 1969 .

[86]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty‐making , 2003 .

[87]  Ha-Joon Chang.  Kicking away the ladder : development strategy in historical perspective , 2002 .

[88]  B. Barham,et al.  States, firms, and raw materials : the world economy and ecology of aluminum , 1994 .

[89]  F. Bolhuis,et al.  Environmental indicators for global cooperation , 1995 .

[90]  Sing C. Chew,et al.  World Ecological Degradation : Accumulation, Urbanization and Deforestation 3000 B.C.-A.D. 2000 , 2001 .

[91]  Banco Mundial,et al.  Global economic prospects and the developing countries , 1992 .

[92]  C. Chase-Dunn.  Global Formation: Structures of the World Economy , 1989 .

[93]  Jeffrey D. Sachs,et al.  The curse of natural resources , 2001 .

[94]  J. Wettestad.  Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Key Conditions , 1999 .

[95]  David Dessler.  What's at stake in the agent-structure debate? , 1989, International Organization.

[96]  C. A. Clarke.  South-North terms of trade, environmental protection and sustainable development , 1992 .

[97]  Andre Gunder Frank,et al.  The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? , 1994 .

[98]  P. Mcmichael,et al.  Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective , 1996 .

[99]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation , 1990 .

[100]  Leslie Sklair,et al.  Globalization: Capitalism and Its Alternatives , 2002 .

[101]  P. Katzenstein,et al.  Conclusion: domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy , 1977, International Organization.

[102]  Jens Weidmann,et al.  Does mother nature corrupt , 1999 .

[103]  R. Wade.  What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’ , 2003 .

[104]  David A. Smith,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980 , 1992 .

[105]  Ronald B. Mitchell,et al.  Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance , 1994 .

[106]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[107]  David John Frank.  Science, Nature, and the Globalization of the Environment, 1870–1990 , 1997 .

[108]  R. Auty.  How Natural Resources Affect Economic Development , 2000 .

[109]  Brett Ashley Leeds,et al.  Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation , 1999 .

[110]  N. P. Macdonald.  Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil , 1980 .

[111]  Inge Kaul,et al.  Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century , 1999 .

[112]  K. Oye.  Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies , 1985, World Politics.

[113]  Michael L. Ross,et al.  The Political Economy of the Resource Curse , 1999, World Politics.

[114]  J. Foster.  The Vulnerable Planet: A Short Economic History of the Environment , 1994 .

[115]  James A. Caporaso,et al.  Integrating Institutions : Rationalism , Constructivism , and the Study of the European Union , 1999 .

[116]  P. Agre.  The Structures of Everyday Life , 1985 .

[117]  Kenneth N. Waltz,et al.  Theory of International Politics , 1979 .

[118]  J. Roberts,et al.  Trouble in Paradise: Globalization and Environmental Crises in Latin America , 2003 .

[119]  T. Schelling.  The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[120]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[121]  John W. Meyer,et al.  The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990 , 1997, International Organization.

[122]  Alec M. Gallup,et al.  The Health of the Planet Survey: a preliminary report on attitudes on the environment and economic growth measured by surveys of citizens in 22 nations to date. , 1992 .

[123]  B. Simmons.  International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[124]  J. Sachs,et al.  The big push, natural resource booms and growth , 1999 .

[125]  John Boli,et al.  [Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875] , 1999 .

[126]  Kenneth A. Schultz,et al.  The Democratic Advantage: Institutional Foundations of Financial Power in International Competition , 2003, International Organization.

[127]  Gary Gereffi,et al.  Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia , 1990 .

[128]  C. Lipson.  Why are some international agreements informal? , 1991, International Organization.

[129]  J. Roberts,et al.  Predicting Participation in Environmental Treaties: A World‐System Analysis* , 1996 .

[130]  Lisa L. Martin.  Democratic Commitments , 2000 .

[131]  Detlef F. Sprinz,et al.  Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations , 2004 .

[132]  Other.  Human Development Report 2002: deepening democracy in a fragmented world , 2002 .

[133]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters Ii: Updated Indicators for 2000-01 , 2002 .

[134]  J. Roberts,et al.  Social Roots of Global Environmental Change: A World-Systems Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2003, Globalization and the Environment.

[135]  M. Tierney,et al.  Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform , 2003, International Organization.

[136]  William C. Smith,et al.  Latin America in the World-Economy , 1996 .

[137]  R. Vernon.  D. Michael Shafer, Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States :Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States , 1997 .

[138]  R. Gastil,et al.  The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions , 1990 .

[139]  L. Gruber.  Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions , 2000 .

[140]  E. Mendoza.  Terms-of-trade uncertainty and economic growth , 1997 .

[141]  F. Castles.  The Rational Design of International Institutions , 2006 .

[142]  Nathan M. Jensen.  Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment , 2003, International Organization.

[143]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  The agent-structure problem in international relations theory , 1987, International Organization.