Proton transport via the membrane surface.

Some proton pumps, such as cytochrome c oxidase (C(c)O), translocate protons across biological membranes at a rate that considerably exceeds the rate of proton transport to the entrance of the proton-conducting channel via bulk diffusion. This effect is usually ascribed to a proton-collecting antenna surrounding the channel entrance. In this paper, we consider a realistic phenomenological model of such an antenna. In our model, a homogeneous membrane surface, which can mediate proton diffusion toward the channel entrance, is populated with protolytic groups that are in dynamic equilibrium with the solution. Equations that describe coupled surface-bulk proton diffusion are derived and analyzed. A general expression for the rate constant of proton transport via such a coupled surface-bulk diffusion mechanism is obtained. A rigorous criterion is formulated of when proton diffusion along the surface enhances the transport. The enhancement factor is found to depend on the ratio of the surface and bulk diffusional constants, pK(a) values of surface protolytic groups, and their concentration. A capture radius for a proton on the surface and an effective size of the antenna are found. The theory also predicts the effective distance that a proton can migrate on the membrane surface between a source (such as CcO) and a sink (such as ATP synthase) without fully equilibrating with the bulk. In pure aqueous solutions, protons can travel over long distances (microns). In buffered solutions, the travel distance is much shorter (nanometers); still the enhancement effect of the surface diffusion on the proton flow to a target on the surface can be tens to hundreds at physiological buffer concentrations. These results are discussed in a general context of chemiosmotic theory.

[1]  H. Khorana,et al.  Rapid long-range proton diffusion along the surface of the purple membrane and delayed proton transfer into the bulk. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Gutman,et al.  Biophysical aspects of intra-protein proton transfer. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[3]  P. Richter,et al.  Rate enhancement by guided diffusion. Chain length dependence of repressor-operator association rates. , 1978, Biophysical chemistry.

[4]  K. Sharp,et al.  Calculations of the electrostatic potential adjacent to model phospholipid bilayers. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[5]  E. Pines,et al.  Geminate recombination in proton‐transfer reactions. II. Comparison of diffusional and kinetic schemes , 1988 .

[6]  J. Teissié.  Lateral proton diffusion , 1996, Nature.

[7]  S. Hardt.  The diffusion transit time; A simple derivation , 1981 .

[8]  P. Brzezinski,et al.  Formation of the "peroxy" intermediate in cytochrome c oxidase is associated with internal proton/hydrogen transfer. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[9]  J. Teissié,et al.  Proton long-range migration along protein monolayers and its consequences on membrane coupling. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  E Nachliel,et al.  The proton collecting function of the inner surface of cytochrome c oxidase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Stuchebrukhov,et al.  Proton transport via coupled surface and bulk diffusion , 2002 .

[12]  G. Careri,et al.  Protein hydration and function. , 1991, Advances in protein chemistry.

[13]  H. Khorana,et al.  Covalently bound pH-indicator dyes at selected extracellular or cytoplasmic sites in bacteriorhodopsin. 1. Proton migration along the surface of bacteriorhodopsin micelles and its delayed transfer from surface to bulk. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[14]  S. Hardt.  Rates of diffusion controlled reactions in one, two and three dimensions. , 1979, Biophysical chemistry.

[15]  P. Brzezinski,et al.  The Deuterium Isotope Effect as a Tool to Investigate Enzyme Catalysis: Proton‐Transfer Control Mechanisms in Cytochrome c Oxidase , 1999 .

[16]  J. Riesle,et al.  D38 is an essential part of the proton translocation pathway in bacteriorhodopsin. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[17]  M. Delbruck,et al.  Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology , 1968 .

[18]  M. Gutman,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the dynamics of proton transfer from photoactivated bacteriorhodopsin to the bulk , 1996, FEBS letters.

[19]  M. Gutman,et al.  Time-resolved proton-protein interaction. Methodology and kinetic analysis , 1988 .

[20]  N. Dencher,et al.  Mechanism of proton entry into the cytoplasmic section of the proton-conducting channel of bacteriorhodopsin. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[21]  M. Gutman,et al.  The dynamic aspects of proton transfer processes , 1990 .

[22]  A. Stuchebrukhov,et al.  Kinetic Treatment of Coupled Electron and Proton Transfer in Flash-Photolysis Experiments on Carbon Monoxide-Inhibited Mixed-Valence Cytochrome c Oxidase , 2001 .

[23]  C Blomberg,et al.  Association kinetics with coupled diffusional flows. Special application to the lac repressor--operator system. , 1976, Biophysical chemistry.

[24]  K. Nunogaki,et al.  The H+/OH- flux localizes around the channel mouth in buffered solution. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  M. Gutman,et al.  Time-resolved dynamics of proton transfer in proteinous systems. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[26]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[27]  N. Dencher,et al.  Protonation dynamics of the extracellular and cytoplasmic surface of bacteriorhodopsin in the purple membrane. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Heberle.  Proton transfer reactions across bacteriorhodopsin and along the membrane. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  O. Berg.  Orientation constraints in diffusion-limited macromolecular association. The role of surface diffusion as a rate-enhancing mechanism. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[30]  J. Teissié,et al.  Proton lateral conduction along a lipid monolayer spread on a physiological subphase. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  S. Ferguson.  Chemiosmotic Coupling: Protons fast and slow , 1995, Current Biology.

[32]  M. Wikström,et al.  Proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin and heme-copper oxidases. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[33]  J. Riesle,et al.  Proton migration along the membrane surface and retarded surface to bulk transfer , 1994, Nature.

[34]  P. Scherrer.  Proton movement on membranes , 1995, Nature.

[35]  P. Unwin,et al.  Lateral Proton Diffusion Rates along Stearic Acid Monolayers , 2000 .

[36]  T. DeCoursey,et al.  An Electrophysiological Comparison of Voltage-Gated Proton Channels, Other Ion Channels, and Other Proton Channels , 1999 .

[37]  H. Khorana,et al.  Covalently bound pH-indicator dyes at selected extracellular or cytoplasmic sites in bacteriorhodopsin. 2. Rotational orientation of helices D and E and kinetic correlation between M formation and proton release in bacteriorhodopsin micelles. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[38]  L. Yaguzhinsky,et al.  Detection of the local H+ gradients on the internal mitochondrial membrane , 1998, FEBS letters.

[39]  F. Richards,et al.  Anion binding and pH-dependent electrostatic effects in ribonuclease. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[40]  W. Cramer,et al.  Energy Transduction in Biological Membranes , 1991 .

[41]  S. McLaughlin,et al.  The role of fixed and mobile buffers in the kinetics of proton movement. , 1987, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[42]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[43]  G. Babcock,et al.  Oxygen activation and the conservation of energy in cell respiration , 1992, Nature.

[44]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[45]  N. Dencher,et al.  Surface-bound optical probes monitor protein translocation and surface potential changes during the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  E. Nachliel,et al.  Gauging of Cytochrome c Structural Fluctuation by Time‐Resolved Proton Pulse , 1999 .

[47]  M. Gutman,et al.  The dynamics of proton exchange between bulk and surface groups , 1995 .

[48]  P. Pohl,et al.  Coupling of proton source and sink via H+‐migration along the membrane surface as revealed by double patch‐clamp experiments , 1998, FEBS letters.