Single low-dose CT scan optimized for rest-stress PET attenuation correction and quantification of coronary artery calcium

AbstractBackground Coronary artery calcium is an important marker of coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using PET-CT technology requires a CT scan for attenuation correction (CTAC) but is not used routinely to measure coronary calcium burden. This study aimed to determine if a low-dose CTAC scan can also accurately quantify coronary artery calcium.MethodsTwenty-three patients underwent both a traditional coronary artery calcium scan on a dedicated cardiac CT scanner (CAC-CT) and a myocardial perfusion scan on a hybrid PET-CT scanner. The standard MPI protocol includes rest and stress-matched PET and CTAC scans. The post-stress CTAC scan was modified to approximate the CAC-CT scan protocol while maintaining ~0.5 mSv dose. Coronary artery calcium scores were compared between the Ca-CTAC and CAC-CT scans.ResultsThe modified Ca-CTAC scan showed a trend toward slight decreases in segmental stress perfusion of 2-3.5% in the anterior wall segments (P < 0.05). Correlation and agreement between the proposed Ca-CTAC and standard CAC-CT calcium scores at the optimal threshold of 110 HU were also excellent (r2 = 0.99, κ = 1.0). There was a small difference in the regression slope vs unity: Ca-CTAC = 0.96 × CAC (P < 0.05), but the categorical classification of calcium was accurate in all twenty-three patients (κ = 1.0).ConclusionA single low-dose rest CTAC scan can be used for accurate attenuation correction of rest and stress PET perfusion images, thus allowing a post-stress CTAC scan to be optimized for improved quantification of coronary artery calcium without increasing radiation dose vs standard protocols.

[1]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[4]  A Adler,et al.  Precision-controlled elution of a 82Sr/82Rb generator for cardiac perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography , 2007, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[6]  Kathryn A. Williams,et al.  Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  D. Berman,et al.  Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Adverse Events Among Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcification Scores of Zero Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography , 2011 .

[8]  Daniel S Berman,et al.  Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging , 2009 .

[10]  I. Burger,et al.  Coronary calcium score scans for attenuation correction of quantitative PET/CT 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Coronary calcium score scan-based attenuation correction in cardiovascular PET imaging , 2010, Nuclear medicine communications.

[12]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. , 2003, Circulation.

[13]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Budoff,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography and calcium score for major adverse cardiac events in outpatients. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  Andy Adler,et al.  Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[17]  L. Husmann,et al.  Long-Term Prognostic Value of 13 N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography Added Value of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2022 .

[18]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Computed tomography calcium score scan for attenuation correction of N-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography: effect of respiratory phase and registration method , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in the Elderly , 2009, Circulation.

[21]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  G. Wells,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease using 3D PET and normal database interpretation , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[23]  B. Chow,et al.  Usefulness of the Agatston score = 0 to exclude ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with heart failure. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  Yeung Yam,et al.  Measuring coronary artery calcification using positron emission tomography-computed tomography attenuation correction images. , 2012, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.