Linear vs Non-Linear Mapping in a Body Machine Interface Based on Electromyographic Signals

The human machine interface (HMI) refers to a paradigm in which the users interact with external devices through an interface that mediates the information exchanges between them and the device. In this work we focused on a HMI that exploits signals derived from the body to control the machine: the body machine interface (BMI). It is reasonable to assume that signals derived from body movements, electromyography activity, as well as brain activity, have a non-linear nature. This implies that linear algorithms cannot exploit all the information contained in these signals. In this work we proposed a new BMI that maps electromyographic signals into the control of a computer cursor by using a new non-linear dimensionality reduction algorithm based on autoassociative neural network. We tested the system on a group of ten healthy subjects that, controlling this cursor, performed a reaching task. We compared the result with the performance of an age and gender matched group of healthy subjects that solved the same task using a BMI based on a linear mapping. The analysis of the performance indices showed a substantial difference between the two groups. In particular, the performance of the people using the non-linear mapping were better in terms of time, accuracy and smoothness of the cursor's movement. This study opened the way to the exploitation of non-linear dimensionality reduction algorithms to pursue a new and effective clinical approach for body-machine interfaces.

[1]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  A body-machine interface for training selective pelvis movements in stroke survivors: A pilot study , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  Elias B. Thorp,et al.  Remapping residual coordination for controlling assistive devices and recovering motor functions , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks Applied to Electromyography Data: A Resource for the Classification of Movements for Prosthetic Hands , 2016, Front. Neurorobot..

[4]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Qualitative assessment of tongue drive system by people with high-level spinal cord injury. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  H.T. Nguyen,et al.  Wireless Real-Time Head Movement System Using a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) for Control of a Power Wheelchair , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[6]  M. Casadio,et al.  Body machine interface: Remapping motor skills after spinal cord injury , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Online mapping of EMG signals into kinematics by autoencoding , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Yoshua. Bengio,et al.  Learning Deep Architectures for AI , 2007, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[9]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Neural networks and principal component analysis: Learning from examples without local minima , 1989, Neural Networks.

[10]  Erik Wästlund,et al.  What you see is where you go: testing a gaze-driven power wheelchair for individuals with severe multiple disabilities , 2010, ETRA.

[11]  Matthias Scholz,et al.  Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis: Neural Network Models and Applications , 2008 .

[12]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Closed-Loop Brain–Machine–Body Interfaces for Noninvasive Rehabilitation of Movement Disorders , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Camilla Pierella,et al.  Static Versus Dynamic Decoding Algorithms in a Non-Invasive Body–Machine Interface , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Body-Machine Interface Enables People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury to Control Devices With Available Body Movements: Proof of Concept , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[16]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative Models , 2013, NIPS.

[18]  Lawrence D. Jackel,et al.  Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition , 1989, Neural Computation.

[19]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  A body machine interface based on inertial sensors , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.