Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND Although no randomised controlled trial has assessed the midterm effects of coronary-artery bypass surgery on the beating heart, this technique is being used in more and more patients. We did two randomised trials to compare the short-term morbidity associated with off-pump and on-pump myocardial revascularisation. Our aim was to pool the results to assess midterm outcomes. METHODS From March, 1997, to November, 1999, we randomly allocated 200 patients to off-pump and 201 to on-pump coronary surgery. In Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Study (BHACAS) 1, we excluded patients who had had myocardial infarction in the past month or who required grafting of the circumflex artery distal to the first obtuse marginal branch. In BHACAS 2, we included such patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiac-related events at midterm follow-up (1-3 years). Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS Analyses of combined data from both trials showed the following risk differences with off-pump compared with on-pump surgery: atrial fibrillation -25% (95% CI -33% to -16%); chest infection -12% (-19% to -5%); inotropic requirement -18% (-25% to -10%); transfusion of red blood cells -31% (-41 to -21); and hospital stay longer than 7 days -13% (-21 to -5). Mean follow-up was 25 0 months (SD 9.1) for BHACAS 1 and 13.7 months (5 5) for BHACAS 2. Four (2%) of 200 patients in the off-pump groups died from any cause, compared with seven (3%) of 201 in the on-pump group (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.17-1.96). 33 (17%) of 200 patients in the off-pump group died or had a cardiac-related event, compared with 42 (21%) of 201 in the on-pump group (0.78, 0 49-1.22). INTERPRETATION Off-pump coronary surgery significantly lowers in-hospital morbidity without compromising outcome in the first 1-3 years after surgery compared with conventional on-pump coronary surgery.

[1]  S Westaby,et al.  Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  M. Caputo,et al.  Intracoronary shunt prevents left ventricular function impairment during beating heart coronary revascularization. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  S. Gundry,et al.  Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  R. Guyton,et al.  Off-pump multivessel coronary bypass via sternotomy is safe and effective. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  D. Spodick,et al.  Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery. , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  E. Buffolo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  C. Hamm,et al.  A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI) , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Martineau,et al.  Systematic off-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel disease: experience of three hundred cases. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  M. Kutner,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery , 1994 .

[10]  M. Caputo,et al.  Off-pump coronary operations can be safely taught to cardiothoracic trainees. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  CABRI Trial Participants,et al.  First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation) , 1995, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Charniot.  Emory angioplasty versus surgery trial , 1995 .

[13]  G M McKhann,et al.  Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S Westaby,et al.  Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  G. Angelini,et al.  Haemodynamic changes during beating heart coronary surgery with the 'Bristol Technique'. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  A. Mezzetti,et al.  Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  N. Trehan,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1990, Indian heart journal.

[18]  D A Cooley,et al.  Con: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  M. Underwood,et al.  Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  M. Carrier,et al.  Quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary anastomoses performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  RITA-2 trial participants.  Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial , 1993, The Lancet.

[22]  Mark F. Newman,et al.  Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Bypass Surgery , 1996 .

[23]  M. Underwood,et al.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.