The effect of the amount of interdental spacing on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with porcelain laminate veneer and composite resin: A 3D-finite element analysis

This study evaluated the influence of the type of restoration and the amount of interdental spacing on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of porcelain laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations. Three-dimensional finite element models were fabricated to represent different types of restorations. Four clinical situations were considered. Type I, closing diastema using composite resin. Labial border of composite resin was extended just enough to cover the interdental space; Type II, closing diastema using composite resin without reduction of labial surface. Labial border of composite resin was extended distally to cover the half of the total labial surface; Type III, closing diastema using composite resin with reduction of labial surface. Labial border of the preparation and restored composite resin was extended distally two-thirds of the total labial surface; Type IV, closing diastema using porcelain laminate veneer with a feathered-edge preparation technique. Four different interdental spaces (1.0, 2.0. 3.0, 4.0 mm) were applied for each type of restorations. For all types of restoration, adding the width of free extension of the porcelain laminate veneer and composite resin increased the stress occurred at the bonding layer. The maximum stress values observed at the bonding layer of Type IV were higher than that of Type I, II and III. However, the increasing rate of maximum stress value of Type IV was lower than that of Type I, II and III.

[1]  N. Chander,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of diastema closure with ceramic laminate veneers. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  Matthias Karl,et al.  Biomechanical methods applied in dentistry: a comparative overview of photoelastic examinations, strain gauge measurements, finite element analysis and three-dimensional deformation analysis. , 2009, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[3]  F. Burke,et al.  Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  H. Maruo,et al.  The dilemma of the open gingival embrasure between maxillary central incisors. , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[5]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  Beata Dejak,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  小奈 正弘.  Influence of alveolar support on stress in periodontal structures , 2008 .

[8]  M. Lenhard.  Closing diastemas with resin composite restorations. , 2008, European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry.

[9]  Heoung-Jae Chun,et al.  Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  R. Aversa,et al.  Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  Beata Dejak,et al.  Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  B. Melsen,et al.  The Finite Element Method: a Tool to Study Orthodontic Tooth Movement , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[13]  L. Baratieri,et al.  Composite restorations in anterior teeth : fundementals and possibilies. , 2005 .

[14]  Pietro Ausiello,et al.  Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. , 2004, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[16]  R. Nash.  Closing a large central diastema using a pressed ceramic. , 2003, Dentistry today.

[17]  M. Swain,et al.  Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  David V. Hutton,et al.  Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Pascal Magne,et al.  Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: a finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. , 2002, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[20]  G Zappini,et al.  Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[21]  U. Belser,et al.  Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  T. Aherne.  Treatment of maxillary anterior diastema using resin-bonded porcelain crown restorations. , 2001, Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[23]  D. Samarawickrama,et al.  Stresses within porcelain veneers and the composite lute using different preparation designs. , 2001, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[24]  B. G. Dale,et al.  Esthetic Dentistry: A Clinical Approach to Techniques and Materials , 2001 .

[25]  E. Hellwig,et al.  An in vitro assessment of the strength of porcelain veneers dependent on tooth preparation. , 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[26]  J Middleton,et al.  A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration-tooth interface, comparing inlays and bulk fillings. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[27]  H. Dumfahrt,et al.  Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II--Clinical results. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[28]  T. Dérand,et al.  Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  P Magne,et al.  Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[30]  H. Dumfahrt.  Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I--Clinical procedure. , 1999, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[31]  A Versluis,et al.  Do Dental Composites Always Shrink Toward the Light? , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[32]  T. Dérand,et al.  Shear stresses in the adhesive layer under porcelain veneers. A finite element method study. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[33]  P. Marquis,et al.  Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years , 1997 .

[34]  P H Jacobsen,et al.  Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[35]  P. Marquis,et al.  Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[36]  E S Reeh,et al.  Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: a strain gauge and finite element evaluation. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[37]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Tensile Properties of Mineralized and Demineralized Human and Bovine Dentin , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[38]  S. Dunne,et al.  A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[39]  Pensler Av.  Multiple-diastema porcelain laminate veneers: a case study. , 1993 .

[40]  E. Davis,et al.  A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics , 1991, British Dental Journal.

[41]  R G Craig,et al.  Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. , 1989, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[42]  A. Senda,et al.  Clinical evaluation of porcelain laminate veneers: a four-year recall report. , 1989, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[43]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: modelling and analysis. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[44]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  A. Caputo,et al.  A photoelastic study of stresses on porcelain laminate preparations. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[46]  H. O. Heymann,et al.  Use of composite resin for restorative and orthodontic correction of anterior interdental spacing. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[47]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bite force and chewing efficiency. , 1974, Frontiers of oral physiology.

[48]  R G Craig,et al.  Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Restored Axisymmetric First Molar , 1974, Journal of dental research.

[49]  R. G. Craig.  Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[50]  T M Graber,et al.  [Orthodontics principles and practice]. , 1968, Boletin de odontologia.

[51]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  Compressive Properties of Enamel, Dental Cements, and Gold , 1961 .