Accounting for tumor purity improves cancer subtype classification from DNA methylation data

Motivation: Tumor sample classification has long been an important task in cancer research. Classifying tumors into different subtypes greatly benefits therapeutic development and facilitates application of precision medicine on patients. In practice, solid tumor tissue samples obtained from clinical settings are always mixtures of cancer and normal cells. Thus, the data obtained from these samples are mixed signals. The ‘tumor purity’, or the percentage of cancer cells in cancer tissue sample, will bias the clustering results if not properly accounted for. Results: In this article, we developed a model‐based clustering method and an R function which uses DNA methylation microarray data to infer tumor subtypes with the consideration of tumor purity. Simulation studies and the analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas data demonstrate improved results compared with existing methods. Availability and implementation: InfiniumClust is part of R package InfiniumPurify, which is freely available from CRAN (https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/InfiniumPurify/index.html). Contact: hao.wu@emory.edu or xqzheng@shnu.edu.cn Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Multiplatform Analysis of 12 Cancer Types Reveals Molecular Classification within and across Tissues of Origin , 2014, Cell.

[2]  Lei Bao,et al.  AbsCN-seq: a statistical method to estimate tumor purity, ploidy and absolute copy numbers from next-generation sequencing data , 2014, Bioinform..

[3]  D. Yip,et al.  Advances in adjuvant systemic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.

[4]  Han Xu,et al.  MethylPurify: tumor purity deconvolution and differential methylation detection from single tumor DNA methylomes , 2014, Genome Biology.

[5]  H. Kitchener,et al.  The Dynamics and Prognostic Potential of DNA Methylation Changes at Stem Cell Gene Loci in Women's Cancer , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[6]  Shuji Ogino,et al.  How many molecular subtypes? Implications of the unique tumor principle in personalized medicine , 2012, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[7]  P. Laird,et al.  Hierarchical clustering of lung cancer cell lines using DNA methylation markers. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  Hao Wu,et al.  Differential methylation analysis for BS-seq data under general experimental design , 2016, Bioinform..

[9]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  A. Butte,et al.  Systematic pan-cancer analysis of tumour purity , 2015, Nature Communications.

[11]  M. Surani,et al.  DNA methylation dynamics during the mammalian life cycle , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[13]  A. Feinberg,et al.  Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[14]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[15]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework , 1993 .

[16]  Margaret R. Karagas,et al.  Model-based clustering of DNA methylation array data: a recursive-partitioning algorithm for high-dimensional data arising as a mixture of beta distributions , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Juan Sandoval,et al.  A DNA methylation‐based definition of biologically distinct breast cancer subtypes , 2014, Molecular oncology.

[18]  Wen-Lin Kuo,et al.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[19]  Hao Wu,et al.  Estimating and accounting for tumor purity in the analysis of DNA methylation data from cancer studies , 2017, Genome Biology.

[20]  Rolf Larsson,et al.  DNA methylation-based subtype prediction for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2014, Clinical Epigenetics.

[21]  Xiaoqi Zheng,et al.  Tumor purity and differential methylation in cancer epigenomics. , 2016, Briefings in functional genomics.

[22]  Xin Zhou,et al.  A statistical framework for Illumina DNA methylation arrays , 2010, Bioinform..

[23]  Jun Wang,et al.  Predicting tumor purity from methylation microarray data , 2015, Bioinform..

[24]  Wenyi Wang,et al.  DeMix: deconvolution for mixed cancer transcriptomes using raw measured data , 2013, Bioinform..

[25]  P. M. Das,et al.  DNA methylation and cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  G. Getz,et al.  Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data , 2013, Nature Communications.

[27]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting , 1993, Nature.

[28]  Devin C Koestler,et al.  Recursively partitioned mixture model clustering of DNA methylation data using biologically informed correlation structures , 2013, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[29]  Jan Baumbach,et al.  Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods , 2015, Nature Methods.

[30]  C. Perou,et al.  Molecular portraits and the family tree of cancer , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[31]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.