A mathematical model for synergistic eukaryotic gene activation.

The precise biochemical mechanism underlying the synergistic action of gene activators on eukaryotic transcription has eluded a solution, largely because of the technical difficulties inherent in analyzing the mechanics of a 2.5 MDa complex comprising greater than 50 polypeptide components. To complement the biochemical approach we have employed mathematical modeling as a means to understand the mechanism of synergy. Parameters relevant to activated transcription were varied in a simple biochemical system and the data were compared to the transcriptional response predicted by a multi-component statistical model. We found that the model achieved a consistent, semi-quantitative description of the measured transcriptional response, and enabled the characterization and measurement of thermodynamic parameters in the in vitro system. The results provide evidence for the existence of cooperativity in the activation process beyond what would be predicted from one current model suggesting that activators function solely by simple recruitment of the general transcription machinery to the promoter.

[1]  T. Maniatis,et al.  The mechanism of transcriptional synergy of an in vitro assembled interferon-beta enhanceosome. , 1997, Molecular cell.

[2]  M. Carey,et al.  The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy , 1998, Cell.

[3]  C. Glass,et al.  Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[4]  Masami Horikoshi,et al.  Transcription factor ATF interacts with the TATA factor to facilitate establishment of a preinitiation complex , 1988, Cell.

[5]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  E. Flemington,et al.  ZEBRA and a Fos-GCN4 chimeric protein differ in their DNA-binding specificities for sites in the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 promoter , 1991, Journal of virology.

[7]  J. Manley,et al.  TFIID can be rate limiting in vivo for TATA-containing, but not TATA-lacking, RNA polymerase II promoters. , 1992, Genes & development.

[8]  S. Edelstein.  An allosteric theory for hemoglobin incorporating asymmetric states to test the putative molecular code for cooperativity. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  R. Young,et al.  The RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications for gene regulation. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Analysis of site-specific interaction parameters in protein-DNA complexes. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Identification of the intermediate allosteric species in human hemoglobin reveals a molecular code for cooperative switching. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T Lagrange,et al.  The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. , 1996, Genes & development.

[13]  R. Kingston,et al.  Activation domain-mediated enhancement of activator binding to chromatin in mammalian cells. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Joung,et al.  Synergistic activation of transcription by bacteriophage lambda cI protein and E. coli cAMP receptor protein. , 1994, Science.

[16]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Paul Lieberman,et al.  A general mechanism for transcriptional synergy by eukaryotic activators , 1995, Nature.

[18]  A. Berk,et al.  A class of activation domains interacts directly with TFIIA and stimulates TFIIA-TFIID-promoter complex assembly , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  Richard H. Ebright,et al.  Promoter structure, promoter recognition, and transcription activation in prokaryotes , 1994, Cell.

[20]  M. Johnson.  Description of the molecular mechanism of cooperativity in human hemoglobin cannot be limited to a first-order free energy coupling concept. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[21]  A. Berk,et al.  The Zta trans-activator protein stabilizes TFIID association with promoter DNA by direct protein-protein interaction. , 1991, Genes & development.

[22]  A. Berk,et al.  A mechanism for TAFs in transcriptional activation: activation domain enhancement of TFIID-TFIIA--promoter DNA complex formation. , 1994, Genes & development.

[23]  M. Carey,et al.  Transcriptional synergy by the Epstein-Barr virus transactivator ZEBRA , 1992, Journal of virology.

[24]  P. Lieberman.  Identification of functional targets of the Zta transcriptional activator by formation of stable preinitiation complex intermediates , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[25]  P. Moore,et al.  Molecular cloning of the small (gamma) subunit of human TFIIA reveals functions critical for activated transcription. , 1994, Genes & development.

[26]  M. Carey,et al.  Compensatory Energetic Relationships between Upstream Activators and the RNA Polymerase II General Transcription Machinery* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  M. Carey,et al.  The ZEBRA activation domain: modular organization and mechanism of action , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  J. Gralla,et al.  Polymerase II promoter activation: closed complex formation and ATP-driven start site opening. , 1992, Science.

[29]  M. Carey,et al.  Assembly of the isomerized TFIIA--TFIID--TATA ternary complex is necessary and sufficient for gene activation. , 1996, Genes & development.

[30]  Michael Carey,et al.  A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives , 1990, Nature.