Light use efficiency of peatlands: Variability and suitability for modeling ecosystem production

Peatland net ecosystem production is a key variable to assess changes in the functional role of peatlands in the global carbon cycle. Light use efficiency (LUE) models in combination with satellite data have been used to estimate production for most major ecosystems, but peatlands have been largely ignored. The objectives of this study were: 1) to examine how the LUE parameter epsilon, e (the amount of carbon fixed or converted to biomass per unit absorbed photosynthetically active radiation), varies between and within four different peatlands; 2) to examine how the variations in e relate to variations in environmental conditions; and 3) to evaluate a LUE-based model for estimation of e in peatlands. We achieve these objectives using a combination of eddy covariance flux measurements, climate data and satellite data and estimate e using the LUE-based vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM). The results show that: 1) mean site-specific flux-derived e values (± standard deviation) were split into three statistically different groups: lowest values at the two colder fens, Kaamanen and Sandhill (0.22 ± 0.18 and 0.23 ± 0.20 g C MJ− 1, respectively), highest values at the treed fen La Biche (0.47 ± 0.27 g C MJ− 1) and intermediate values at the bog, Mer Bleue (0.34 ± 0.18 g C MJ− 1); 2) Variations in monthly e within sites related mainly to air temperature, while variations in annual e within sites related mainly to wetness variables; 3) relative mean absolute errors of estimates of e for the four sites ranged between 19% and 35%, with r2 values ranging between 72% and 93%. LUE models are appealing as they are relatively simple formulations of variables that are easily obtained from satellite data. Challenges associated with the use of satellite data derived input variables are further discussed in the paper.

[1]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  C. Willmott Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance , 1982 .

[3]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A diagnostic carbon flux model to monitor the effects of disturbance and interannual variation in climate on regional NEP , 2006 .

[4]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Combined satellite gravity field model GOCO01S derived from GOCE and GRACE , 2010 .

[5]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data , 1994 .

[6]  S. T. Gower,et al.  A cross‐biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production , 2003 .

[7]  N. Dise Peatland Response to Global Change , 2009, Science.

[8]  I. Prentice,et al.  Integrating peatlands and permafrost into a dynamic global vegetation model: 2. Evaluation and sensitivity of vegetation and carbon cycle processes , 2009 .

[9]  Shane Ward,et al.  Using MODIS derived fPAR with ground based flux tower measurements to derive the light use efficiency for two Canadian peatlands , 2009 .

[10]  T. Laurila,et al.  Annual CO2 balance of a subarctic fen in northern Europe: Importance of the wintertime efflux , 2002 .

[11]  J. Loisel,et al.  Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum , 2010 .

[12]  E. Davidson,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest , 2004 .

[13]  T. Riutta,et al.  Spatial variation in CO2 exchange at a northern aapa mire , 2011 .

[14]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[15]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden , 2005 .

[16]  Patrick M. Crill,et al.  Modeling seasonal to annual carbon balance of Mer Bleue Bog, Ontario, Canada , 2002 .

[17]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Monitoring spring canopy phenology of a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS , 2006 .

[18]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Issues Related to Incorporating Northern Peatlands into Global Climate Models , 2013 .

[19]  Akihiko Ito,et al.  Global Mapping of Terrestrial Primary Productivity and Light-Use Efficiency with a Process-Based Model , 2004 .

[20]  J. Gamon,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels , 1997, Oecologia.

[21]  J. E. Chalifour,et al.  Atlas of Canada , 1909, Nature.

[22]  Steve Frolking,et al.  Interannual variability in the peatland‐atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange at an ombrotrophic bog , 2003 .

[23]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[24]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of primary production : an improved production efficiency modeling approach , 1999 .

[25]  Steve Frolking,et al.  Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog , 2002 .

[26]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing , 1995 .

[27]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[28]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements , 2004 .

[29]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[30]  E. Gorham Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  J. Ardö,et al.  A remote sensing-based primary production model for grassland biomes , 2003 .

[32]  Tuomas Laurila,et al.  The timing of snow melt controls the annual CO2 balance in a subarctic fen , 2004 .

[33]  D. Siegel,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF VEGETATION TO CHEMICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN THE LOST RIVER PEATLAND, NORTHERN MINNESOTA , 1990 .

[34]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparison of MODIS, eddy covariance determined and physiologically modelled gross primary production (GPP) in a Douglas-fir forest stand , 2007 .

[35]  A. Rosati,et al.  A simple method to estimate photosynthetic radiation use efficiency of canopies. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[36]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Simulation of six years of carbon fluxes for a sedge‐dominated oligotrophic minerogenic peatland in Northern Sweden using the McGill Wetland Model (MWM) , 2013 .

[37]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Estimating northern peatland CO2 exchange from MODIS time series data , 2010 .

[38]  S. Running,et al.  Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels , 1993 .

[39]  T. A. Black,et al.  Photosynthetic light use efficiency of three biomes across an east–west continental-scale transect in Canada , 2006 .

[40]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[41]  Jonathan Seaquist,et al.  Estimating carbon dioxide exchange rates at contrasting northern peatlands using MODIS satellite data , 2013 .

[42]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[43]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  On the relationship between water table depth and water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes in a minerotrophic fen , 2009 .

[44]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[45]  Lawrence B. Flanagan,et al.  Environmental control of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a treed, moderately rich fen in northern Alberta , 2006 .

[46]  A. Gitelson,et al.  The need for a common basis for defining light-use efficiency: Implications for productivity estimation , 2015 .

[47]  J. Seaquist,et al.  Phenology and its role in carbon dioxide exchange processes in northern peatlands , 2014 .

[48]  T. Vesala,et al.  Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes , 2007 .

[49]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index - An assessment using the SAIL model , 1992 .

[50]  L. Flanagan,et al.  Stimulation of both photosynthesis and respiration in response to warmer and drier conditions in a boreal peatland ecosystem , 2011 .

[51]  P. Richard,et al.  Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland , 2007 .

[52]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Interannual variability of net ecosystem productivity in forests is explained by carbon flux phenology in autumn , 2013 .

[53]  T. A. Black,et al.  A MODIS-derived photochemical reflectance index to detect inter-annual variations in the photosynthetic light-use efficiency of a boreal deciduous forest , 2005 .

[54]  Julie Talbot,et al.  Assessing long‐term hydrological and ecological responses to drainage in a raised bog using paleoecology and a hydrosequence , 2010 .

[55]  Weimin Ju,et al.  Spatially explicit simulation of peatland hydrology and carbon dioxide exchange: Influence of mesoscale topography , 2008 .

[56]  Carl C. Trettin,et al.  Analyzing the ecosystem carbon and hydrologic characteristics of forested wetland using a biogeochemical process model , 2005 .

[57]  J. Silvola Combined effects of varying water content and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis in Spagnum fuscum , 1990 .

[58]  D. Mackay,et al.  CO2 fluxes at northern fens and bogs have opposite responses to inter‐annual fluctuations in water table , 2010 .

[59]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) , 2008 .

[60]  J. Canadell,et al.  Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region , 2009 .

[61]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  A new approach for estimating northern peatland gross primary productivity using a satellite‐sensor‐derived chlorophyll index , 2011 .

[62]  J. Monteith SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[63]  Lawrence B. Flanagan,et al.  Effect of changes in water content on photosynthesis, transpiration and discrimination against 13CO2 and C18O16O in Pleurozium and Sphagnum , 1996, Oecologia.