Representational neglect and navigation in virtual space

Previous studies have shown that mental representational disorders affect specific mechanisms that subserve human orientation. Specifically, representational neglect impairs the ability to reorient oneself in a new environment. Apparently, the inability of patients with this disorder to manipulate a mental representation of the environment prevents them from using their previous navigational experience. In this study, we compared representational neglect patients' performance with the performance of other groups of brain-damaged patients (left and right lesions) without representational disorders and healthy participants during navigation in a virtual maze with and without local landmarks. The virtual environment allows to observe navigation ruling out vestibular and proprioceptive information about linear and angular movements that could explain results of previous studies and to shed some light on navigational disorders shown by perceptual and representational neglect patients. We found that brain-damaged patients without neglect and healthy participants showed no deficits in navigation. Further perceptual and representational neglect patients performed poorly across experimental conditions. Finally, only the representational neglect patients group was unable to build or retrieve the mental representation of a new environment.

[1]  F. Newcombe,et al.  Disorders of space exploration and cognition E. De Renzi. John Wiley, Chichester (1982). 268 pp. , 1982, Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Cortical Modulation of Whole Body Movements in Brain-Damaged Patients , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[3]  E Capitani,et al.  Raven's coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adult normal controls. , 1987, Functional neurology.

[4]  Ronald W. Skelton,et al.  Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  M. Albert.  A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[6]  S. Black,et al.  Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT , 1998, Neurology.

[7]  N. Gale,et al.  Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition , 1987 .

[8]  Holly A. Taylorandbarbaratversky.  Spatial Mental Models Derived from Survey and Route Descriptions , 1992 .

[9]  A Berthoz,et al.  Parietal and hippocampal contribution to topokinetic and topographic memory. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  C. Guariglia,et al.  Pure representational neglect and navigational deficits in a case with preserved visuo-spatial working memory , 2008, Neurocase.

[11]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  S. Becker,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. , 2007, Psychological review.

[13]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Spatial navigation: cognitive and neuropsychological aspects , 2006 .

[15]  M. L. Rusconi,et al.  Unilateral neglect in route description , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Harry Heft.  The role of environmental features in route-learning: Two exploratory studies of way-finding , 1979 .

[17]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  The Relationship Between Visual Perception and Visual Mental Imagery: A Reappraisal of the Neuropsychological Evidence , 2002, Cortex.

[18]  C Luzzatti,et al.  Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Perceiving Left and Imagining Right: Dissociation in Neglect , 2000, Cortex.

[20]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  P. Pantano,et al.  Unilateral neglect restricted to visual imagery , 1993, Nature.

[22]  S. Black,et al.  Intact spatial updating during locomotion after right posterior parietal lesions , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  T Landis,et al.  Pure representational neglect after right thalamic lesion , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[24]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect , 1994, Neurology.

[25]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Toward a comprehensive diagnosis of visual-spatial disorders in unilateral brain damaged patients. , 1989 .

[27]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Navigation: Neuropsychological Evidence , 2007 .

[28]  Paul N. Wilson,et al.  The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment , 1994 .

[29]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization , 1977 .

[31]  Luigi Pizzamiglio,et al.  Evidence for Separate Allocentric and Egocentric Space Processing in Neglect Patients , 1998, Cortex.

[32]  D. Perani,et al.  Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  G. Rode,et al.  Négligence de l'espace représenté: mise en évidence par l'évocation mentale de la carte de France. , 1995 .

[34]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[35]  L. Pelosi,et al.  On the different roles of the cerebral hemispheres in mental imagery: The “o'Clock Test” in two clinical cases , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[37]  R. Logie,et al.  What the Eyes Perceive, The Brain Ignores: A Case of Pure Unilateral Representational Neglect , 1997, Cortex.

[38]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Updating of locations during whole-body rotations in patients with hemispatial neglect , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  J William Healy,et al.  HEMI-INATTENTION AND HEMISPHERE SPECIALIZATION , 1981 .

[40]  G. Vallar.  Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect and Its Neuroanatomy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[41]  G. Iaria,et al.  Representational neglect and navigation in real space , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  H. Coslett.  Neglect in vision and visual imagery: a double dissociation. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Stuart C. Grant,et al.  Contributions of Proprioception to Navigation in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[44]  P L Brennan,et al.  Cognitive mapping and elderly adults: verbal and location memory for urban landmarks. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[45]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[46]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[48]  William H Warren,et al.  Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  J. Driver,et al.  Visual Neglect , 1998 .

[50]  R. Passingham.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[51]  P. Dudchenko.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map , 2010 .

[52]  D. Nico,et al.  Landmark based navigation in brain-damaged patients with neglect , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  O. Blanke,et al.  Pure imagery hemi-neglect of far space , 2003, Neurology.

[54]  B. Anderson.  Spared awareness for the left side of internal visual images in patients with left‐sided extrapersonal neglect , 1993, Neurology.

[55]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  A fronto-parietal system for computing the egocentric spatial frame of reference in humans , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect And Space Constancy During Passive Locomotion , 1997, Cortex.

[57]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  Spatial Cognition and Reasoning. , 1980 .

[58]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment , 2007, Psychological research.

[60]  Robert M. Yadrick,et al.  Assessment of configurational knowledge of naturally- and artificially-acquired large-scale space , 1994 .

[61]  E Capitani,et al.  A neuropsychological instrument adding to the description of patients with suspected cortical dementia: the Milan overall dementia assessment. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[62]  C. Guariglia,et al.  Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  T Landis,et al.  Double dissociation between representational personal and extrapersonal neglect , 2006, Neurology.

[64]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[65]  J. Marshall,et al.  Unilateral neglect , 1998, Neurology.

[66]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Interaction of visual and idiothetic information in a path completion task , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.