Attracting Young Engineers to the Rail Industry in Australia Refereed Paper

This paper reports the quantitative stage of a mixed-methods research project focussing on attracting engineers and skilled technologists to careers in the Australian rail industry. There is increased demand for engineering skills and a need to replace retirees yet it has been identified that rail is not attracting its share of entry level and mid-career professionals. Using career preference and brand equity theory the survey with engineering students and their influencers map what graduating engineers aspire to and what they and HR/industry stakeholders consider rail offers. The identified mismatch between what attracts these young engineers to engineering careers and what they perceive rail offers and what HR professionals believe rail offers can inform rail branding and attraction strategies.

[1]  Christopher J. Collins,et al.  Exploring Applicant Pool Quantity and Quality: The Effects of Early Recruitment Practice Strategies, Corporate Advertising, and Firm Reputation , 2004 .

[2]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[3]  C. Stevens,et al.  The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. , 2002 .

[4]  Frederik Anseel,et al.  Organizational Identity and Employer Image: Towards a Unifying Framework , 2007 .

[5]  John W. Creswell,et al.  The mixed methods reader , 2008 .

[6]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context , 2005 .

[7]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .

[8]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[9]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[10]  I. Fulmer,et al.  ARE THE 100 BEST BETTER? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEING A “GREAT PLACE TO WORK” AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[11]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[12]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Filip Lievens,et al.  The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. , 2003 .

[14]  P. Berthon,et al.  Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding , 2005 .

[15]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Measuring Attraction to Organizations , 2003 .

[16]  Roslyn Cameron,et al.  Attraction and image for the Australian rail industry , 2010 .

[17]  D. Mohr,et al.  Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .