Impaired “Affective Theory of Mind” Is Associated with Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage

Objective:To examine the hypothesis that patients with ventromedial (VM) frontal lesions are impaired in the affective rather than cognitive facets of theory of mind (ToM). Background:Prefrontal brain damage may result in impaired social behavior, especially when the damage involves the orbitofrontal/VM prefrontal cortex (PFC). It has been previously suggested that deficits in ToM may account for such aberrant behavior. However, inconsistent results have been reported, and different regions within the frontal cortex have been associated with ToM impairment. Method:The performance of 26 patients with localized lesions in the PFC was compared with responses of 13 patients with posterior lesions and 13 normal control subjects. Three ToM tasks differing in the level of emotional processing involved were used: second-order false belief task, understanding ironic utterances, and identifying social faux pas. Results and Conclusions:The results indicated that patients with VM (but not dorsolateral) prefrontal lesions were significantly impaired in irony and faux pas but not in second-order false belief as compared with patients with posterior lesions and normal control subjects. Lesions in the right VM area were associated with the most severe ToM deficit. These results are discussed in terms of the cognitive and affective facets of “mind-reading” processes mediated by the VM cortex.

[1]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Neuropsychological correlates of early symptoms of autism. , 1998, Child development.

[2]  E. Ross,et al.  Lateralization of Affective Prosody in Brain and the Callosal Integration of Hemispheric Language Functions , 1997, Brain and Language.

[3]  Ellen Winner,et al.  How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second‐order mental state attributions , 1995 .

[4]  D. Pandya,et al.  Interhemispheric connections of the precentral motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[5]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[6]  R. Jones,et al.  Recognition of Faux Pas by Normally Developing Children and Children with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism , 1999, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[7]  B. Ackerman Young Children's Understanding of a Speaker's Intentional Use of a False Utterance , 1981 .

[8]  L. Brothers,et al.  A Neuroethological Framework for the Representation of Minds , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Rolls,et al.  The Orbitofrontal Cortex , 2019 .

[11]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[12]  J. Fuster Frontal lobes , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling other minds , 1995, Neuroreport.

[14]  B. Anlar,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Asperger's Syndrome , 2001, Journal of child neurology.

[15]  F. Happé Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory , 1993, Cognition.

[16]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Understanding Following Right Hemisphere Damage , 1996, Brain and Language.

[18]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  S. McDonald Exploring the Process of Inference Generation in Sarcasm: A Review of Normal and Clinical Studies , 1999, Brain and Language.

[21]  B. Berger,et al.  Characterization of Empathy Deficits following Prefrontal Brain Damage: The Role of the Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  L Cipolotti,et al.  Impaired social response reversal. A case of 'acquired sociopathy'. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  R. Adolphs Social cognition and the human brain , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J Aharon-Peretz,et al.  Empathy Deficits in Asperger Syndrome: a Cognitive Profile , 2002, Neurocase.

[25]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[26]  Paul J. Eslinger,et al.  Frontal lobe and frontal-striatal substrates for different forms of human cognitive flexibility , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. , 1997, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[29]  A. Damasio,et al.  Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. , 1991 .

[30]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Recognition of Mental State Terms , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[31]  H. Wimmer,et al.  “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆ , 1985 .

[32]  E. Rolls,et al.  Gustatory responses of single neurons in the caudolateral orbitofrontal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D. Stuss,et al.  The frontal lobes are necessary for 'theory of mind'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[35]  D. Premack,et al.  Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. , 1978, Science.

[36]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[37]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation , 1985, Neurology.

[38]  J. Aharon-Peretz,et al.  Deficit in Understanding Sarcasm in Patients with Prefronal Lesion Is Related to Impaired Empathic Ability , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[40]  A. Damasio,et al.  Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[41]  A. Damasio,et al.  Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  E. Winner,et al.  Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. , 1996, Child development.

[43]  D. Neary Lesion Analysis in Neuropsychology , 1990 .

[44]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[45]  Paul J. Eslinger,et al.  Neurological and Neuropsychological Bases of Empathy , 1998, European Neurology.

[46]  T. Robbins,et al.  Choosing between Small, Likely Rewards and Large, Unlikely Rewards Activates Inferior and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[48]  C. Polkey,et al.  "Theory of mind" impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  R. Knight,et al.  Frontal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.