Human–automation teams and adaptable control for future air traffic management

Abstract The design and management of human–automation teams for future air traffic systems require an understanding of principles of cognitive systems engineering, allocation of function and team adaptation. The current article proposes a framework of human–automation team adaptable control that incorporates adaptable automation [Oppermann, R., Simm, H., 1994. Adaptability: user-initiated individualization. In: Oppermann, R. (Ed.), Adaptive User Support: Ergonomic Design of Manually and Automatically Adaptable Software. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 14–64] with an Extended Control Model of Joint Cognitive System functioning [Hollnagel, E., Nabo, A., Lau, I., 21–24 July 2003. A systemic model for driver-in-control. In: Paper Presented at the Second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Park City, UT] nested within a dynamic view of team adaptation [Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., Kendall, D., 2006. Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 1189–1207]. Modeling the temporal dynamics of the coordination of human–automation teams under conditions of Free Flight requires an appreciation of the episodic, cyclical nature of team processes from transition to action phases, along with the distinction of team processes from emergent states [Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., Zaccaro, S.J., 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 26, 356–376]. The conceptual framework of human–automation team adaptable control provides a basis for future research and design. Relevance to industry The current article provides a conceptual framework to direct future investigations to determine the optimal design and management of Human–automation teams for Free Flight-based air traffic management systems.

[1]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[2]  Thomas B Sheridan,et al.  Report of a Workshop on Human-Automation Interaction in NGATS , 2006 .

[3]  E. Hollnagel Handbook of Cognitive Task Design , 2009 .

[4]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Team Mental Models: Techniques, Methods, and Analytic Approaches , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[7]  Eric Hoffman,et al.  Limited Delegation of Separation Assurance to the Flight Crew: Principles and Benefits , 1999 .

[8]  Peter Brooker,et al.  AIRBORNE SEPARATION ASSURANCE SYSTEMS: TOWARDS A WORK PROGRAMME TO PROVE SAFETY , 2004 .

[9]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[10]  S. Mohammed,et al.  The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema , 2000 .

[11]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Team Play with a Powerful and Independent Agent: A Full-Mission Simulation Study , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Victor Riley Developing a Pilot-Centered Autoflight Interface , 2000 .

[13]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  The Role of the Air Traffic Controller in Future Air Traffic Management: An Empirical Study of Active Control versus Passive Monitoring , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[15]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Understanding social interactions in complex work: a video ethnography , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Victor A. Riley,et al.  A General Model of Mixed-Initiative Human-Machine Systems , 1989 .

[18]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Strategies for designing distributed systems: case studies in the design of an air traffic management system , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[19]  Björn Johansson Joint control in dynamic situations , 2005 .

[20]  Rob C J Ruigrok,et al.  Human factors evaluations of Free Flight Issues solved and issues remaining. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators and Automation , 1998 .

[22]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[23]  Laurence Rognin,et al.  Human communication, mutual awareness and system dependability. Lessons learnt from air-traffic control field studies , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  C. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2008 .

[25]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[26]  V. Groom,et al.  Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams , 2007 .

[27]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Function allocation: algorithm, alchemy or apostasy? , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Hugo de Jonge ATM/CNS: the response to current and future needs , 2000 .

[29]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions , 2004 .

[30]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Trust, Self-Confidence and Authority in Human-Machine Systems , 1998 .

[31]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: empirical studies with RoboFlag , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[32]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[33]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[34]  David Woods,et al.  1. How to make automated systems team players , 2002 .

[35]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Adaptive Automation of Human-Machine System Information-Processing Functions , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[36]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[37]  T. Inagaki,et al.  Smart collaboration between humans and machines based on mutual understanding , 2008, Annu. Rev. Control..

[38]  J. Hackman Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras , 2003 .

[39]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Coping with Computers in the Cockpit , 1999 .

[40]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Principles for modelling function allocation , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  T. Inagaki,et al.  Design of human–machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[42]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[43]  James F. Allen,et al.  Human-Machine Collaborative Planning , 2002 .

[44]  Reinhard Oppermann,et al.  Adaptive user support: ergonomic design of manually and automatically adaptable software , 1994 .

[45]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[46]  D. Wiegmann,et al.  Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review , 2007 .

[47]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[48]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  Teamwork in Cyberspace: Using TEAMCORE to Make Agents Team-Ready , 1999 .

[50]  A. Wirth,et al.  Analyzing shared and team mental models , 2001 .

[51]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[52]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[53]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[54]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[55]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Human factors Issues in air traffic control under free flight , 2009 .

[56]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[57]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[58]  David B. Kaber,et al.  On the Design of Adaptive Automation for Complex Systems , 2001 .

[59]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[60]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Dynamic adaptive autonomy in multi-agent systems , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[61]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[62]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Ten Challenges for Making Automation a "Team Player" in Joint Human-Agent Activity , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[63]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[64]  Christopher P. Nemeth Groups at work: lessons from research into large-scale coordination , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[65]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[66]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[67]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  Diana Liang CNS/ATM Enhancements to Reduce Aircraft Emissions , 1998 .

[70]  Vincent G. Duffy,et al.  Human centred computing : cognitive, social and ergonomic aspects , 2003 .

[71]  P. P. van Maanen,et al.  Designing for dynamic task allocation , 2005 .

[72]  Ryan W. Proud,et al.  Methods for Determining the Level of Autonomy to Design into a Human Spaceflight Vehicle: A Function Specific Approach , 2003 .

[73]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Multi-level issues in organizations and time , 2007 .

[74]  N. Anderson,et al.  Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[75]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Application of Human Factors to the Development of Expert Systems for Advanced Cockpits , 1987 .

[76]  J. W. McDaniel,et al.  Rules for fighter cockpit automation , 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[77]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Dimensions of Adjustable Autonomy and Mixed-Initiative Interaction , 2003, Agents and Computational Autonomy.

[78]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[79]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  The role of the controller in the accelerating industry of air traffic management , 2001 .

[80]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[81]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Pre-requisites for large scale coordination , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[82]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Leadership in multiteam systems. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Stephen M Fiore,et al.  Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[84]  Paul Schutte,et al.  Complemation: An Alternative to Automation , 1999 .

[85]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Flight decks and free flight: where are the system boundaries? , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[86]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[87]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[88]  Robert M. Taylor Capability, Cognition and Autonomy , 2003 .

[89]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Teamwork in multiteam systems. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[90]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  A SYSTEMIC MODEL FOR DRIVER-IN-CONTROL , 2005 .

[91]  C W Clegg,et al.  Sociotechnical principles for system design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[92]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task , 2006 .

[93]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Criteria for the complementary allocation of functions in automated work systems and their use in simultaneous engineering projects. , 1995 .

[94]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Agents And Computational Autonomy: Potential, Risks, And Solutions (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) , 2004 .

[95]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[96]  Sidney W. A. Dekker,et al.  MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[97]  Peter Brooker,et al.  Air traffic control automation: For humans or people? , 2005 .

[98]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control , 1994 .

[99]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Edited by Christopher D. Wickens, Anne S. Mavor, & James P. McGee 1997, 368 pages, $44.95. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ISBN 0-309-05637-3 , 1997 .

[100]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[101]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of human factors. , 1987 .

[102]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms, and Institutions for ... Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) , 2006 .

[103]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[104]  Reinhard Oppermann,et al.  Adaptability: user-initiated individualization , 1994 .

[105]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[106]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[107]  Janke Langen-Fox,et al.  Developing Methods for Analysing Team Mental Model Data , 2007 .

[108]  Asaf Degani,et al.  Taming HAL: Designing Interfaces Beyond 2001 , 2004 .

[109]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety , 2009 .

[110]  Niek J. E. Wijngaards,et al.  Towards Sustained Team Effectiveness , 2005, BNAIC.

[111]  J. McGrath Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[112]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[113]  W. Karwowski International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors , 2001 .

[114]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research , 2002 .

[115]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[116]  Gemma Cox,et al.  Flightdeck and air traffic control collaboration evaluation (FACE): evaluating aviation communication in the laboratory and field. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[117]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[118]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  Computer simulation for the design of authority in the adaptive cruise control systems under possibility of driver's over-trust in automation , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[119]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Understanding adaptability : a prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments , 2006 .

[120]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work , 2006 .

[121]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[122]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control , 2001 .

[123]  Linda G. Pierce,et al.  Adaptive Automation: Building Flexibility into Human-Machine Systems , 2006 .

[124]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .